On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:14:24PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
CC'ed Tim: Are you still on board for netsed? Thread starts here
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/06/msg00015.html
> Fair enough. I just didn't feel comfortable to package an entire new
> upstream source for a QA upload.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mats Erik and Sven,
On 02.06.2011 12:42, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
>> >> Reading the bug logs I'd favour an upload using the 'new upstream'
>> >> version.
> >
> > The bug #586037 is sufficient to motivate the removal of a package
> > built from th
torsdag den 2 juni 2011 klockan 10:23 skrev Sven Hoexter detta:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:59:46AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'd like to ask for sponsoring of my QA upload for the package netsed.
> >
> > It does not introduce a new version since upstream is dead since 2001
> > but
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:59:46AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
> I'd like to ask for sponsoring of my QA upload for the package netsed.
>
> It does not introduce a new version since upstream is dead since 2001
> but the package is fairly cool, has a reasonable popcon and no open RC
> bugs (but W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry, my bad. The mail subject should have been "netsed" of course.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG w
5 matches
Mail list logo