Re: RFH Re: conglomerate_0.7.14-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-29 Thread Wesley J Landaker
On Sunday 29 August 2004 12:11, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > You're right; thanks for the clairification. In that case, it might > > make sense to change my habit to "lintian *.changes" and save a few > > keystrokes. =) > > Which is exactly what debuild by default does for you. In addition, > i

Re: RFH Re: conglomerate_0.7.14-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-29 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 12:08:54PM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > On Sunday 29 August 2004 11:50, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > > > I generally use > > > > > > $ lintian *.{deb,dsc,changes} > > > Running lintian on a .chang

Re: RFH Re: conglomerate_0.7.14-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-29 Thread Wesley J Landaker
On Sunday 29 August 2004 11:50, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > > I generally use > > > > $ lintian *.{deb,dsc,changes} > Running lintian on a .changes file will simply run in on those files > named in it, it isn't needed to also

Re: RFH Re: conglomerate_0.7.14-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-29 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > On Tuesday 17 August 2004 04:09, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then > > mine. According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version > > 1.23.2, I use that version

Re: RFH Re: conglomerate_0.7.14-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-29 Thread Wesley J Landaker
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 04:09, Geert Stappers wrote: > I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then > mine. According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version > 1.23.2, I use that version also. The linda program does report also > the missing manpage, but not the

Re: RFH Re: conglomerate_0.7.14-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-29 Thread Wesley J Landaker
On Sunday 29 August 2004 12:11, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > You're right; thanks for the clairification. In that case, it might > > make sense to change my habit to "lintian *.changes" and save a few > > keystrokes. =) > > Which is exactly what debuild by default does for you. In addition, > i

Re: RFH Re: conglomerate_0.7.14-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-29 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 12:08:54PM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > On Sunday 29 August 2004 11:50, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > > > I generally use > > > > > > $ lintian *.{deb,dsc,changes} > > > Running lintian on a .chang

Re: RFH Re: conglomerate_0.7.14-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-29 Thread Wesley J Landaker
On Sunday 29 August 2004 11:50, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > > I generally use > > > > $ lintian *.{deb,dsc,changes} > Running lintian on a .changes file will simply run in on those files > named in it, it isn't needed to also

Re: RFH Re: conglomerate_0.7.14-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-29 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > On Tuesday 17 August 2004 04:09, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then > > mine. According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version > > 1.23.2, I use that version

Re: RFH Re: conglomerate_0.7.14-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

2004-08-29 Thread Wesley J Landaker
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 04:09, Geert Stappers wrote: > I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then > mine. According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version > 1.23.2, I use that version also. The linda program does report also > the missing manpage, but not the