Marco Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
> Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
> porters not to
Marco Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
> Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
> porters not t
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:29:15PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
Some software cannot be easily ported to any architectures.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:29:15PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
Some software cannot be easily ported to any architectures.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:01:40AM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources.
*shrug* The build daemons override it anyway. I don't see a point in
inflating it into an issue of political correctness like Geert seems to
want to do; if it doesn't work for some
"J. Scott Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources. But I am curious how one
> tests on various platforms. All of my machines are x86 and PowerPC (and
> it's dead at the moment). Then of course I could use the compile farm at
> SourceForge.
If you
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> >* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> >
> >> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> >> ported to certain architectures?
> >
> >Sorry, perhaps I should
At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
>> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
>> ported to certain architectures?
>
>Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
>porters not to try
* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> ported to certain architectures?
Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
porters not to try to build a certain package? (For example,
when the p
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:01:40AM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources.
*shrug* The build daemons override it anyway. I don't see a point in
inflating it into an issue of political correctness like Geert seems to
want to do; if it doesn't work for some
"J. Scott Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources. But I am curious how one
> tests on various platforms. All of my machines are x86 and PowerPC (and
> it's dead at the moment). Then of course I could use the compile farm at
> SourceForge.
If yo
At 22:35 +0200 9/11/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>Dear mentors,
>
>I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
>prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
>Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
>architectures for all the packages that my
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> >* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> >
> >> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> >> ported to certain architectures?
> >
> >Sorry, perhaps I should
At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
>> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
>> ported to certain architectures?
>
>Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
>porters not to try
* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> ported to certain architectures?
Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
porters not to try to build a certain package? (For example,
when the
At 22:35 +0200 9/11/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>Dear mentors,
>
>I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
>prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
>Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
>architectures for all the packages that m
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:35:20PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
> prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
> Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
> architectures for all the packages that m
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 13:35, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
> prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
> Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
> architectures for all t
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:35:20PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
> prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
> Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
> architectures for all the packages that
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 13:35, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
> prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
> Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
> architectures for all
20 matches
Mail list logo
