On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:00:51AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Perhaps someone can run through a case where using bugs against
> ftp.debian.org can't solve the problem?
I think it would solve all problems, but the load on the archive
maintainers might get too high. Imagine the situation whe
Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:50:15PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> > There are a few solutions.
> >
> > - Buildd supports non-free also. (with lower priority so that
> >non-free packages should not affect building of main packages...
> >any idea of "lower prior
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:00:51AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Perhaps someone can run through a case where using bugs against
> ftp.debian.org can't solve the problem?
I think it would solve all problems, but the load on the archive
maintainers might get too high. Imagine the situation wh
Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:50:15PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> > There are a few solutions.
> >
> > - Buildd supports non-free also. (with lower priority so that
> >non-free packages should not affect building of main packages...
> >any idea of "lower prio
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:49:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > This list will be different from the "Architecture:" field, which
> > lists on what platforms the package can be built at all.
>
> Would the list ever be different from the union of the Architecture:
> field and the architectures t
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:49:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > This list will be different from the "Architecture:" field, which
> > lists on what platforms the package can be built at all.
>
> Would the list ever be different from the union of the Architecture:
> field and the architectures
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 12:51:13AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > - Non-free packages can be included in testing without having
> >binaries for all architectures. (Since non-free is not an official
> >part of Debian, this doesn't mean degrading quality of Debian.)
Not having binaries
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:50:15PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> There are a few solutions.
>
> - Buildd supports non-free also. (with lower priority so that
>non-free packages should not affect building of main packages...
>any idea of "lower priority"? "after freeze" is a good idea.)
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 12:51:13AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > - Non-free packages can be included in testing without having
> >binaries for all architectures. (Since non-free is not an official
> >part of Debian, this doesn't mean degrading quality of Debian.)
Not having binarie
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:50:15PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> There are a few solutions.
>
> - Buildd supports non-free also. (with lower priority so that
>non-free packages should not affect building of main packages...
>any idea of "lower priority"? "after freeze" is a good idea.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:50:15PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see. I understand the limitation of the resource. It is reasonable
> that main packages have priority in such a case.
definitely.
> Xearth is the package I want to build now. Though it may be free in
> future (with r
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 02:50:15PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see. I understand the limitation of the resource. It is reasonable
> that main packages have priority in such a case.
definitely.
> Xearth is the package I want to build now. Though it may be free in
> future (with
Hi,
At Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:40:31 -0600,
Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you want to have built? Maybe I can give it a shot. Otherwise I
> propose to convince the author of your package to make it free, it will be
> built by the buildds then. After all, non-free is not p
Hi,
At Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:40:31 -0600,
Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you want to have built? Maybe I can give it a shot. Otherwise I
> propose to convince the author of your package to make it free, it will be
> built by the buildds then. After all, non-free is not
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:52:54AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> An 060, lots of RAM and HDD space and a NIC. See my potato page for some
> links. You can do with an 030 or 040, but you _want_ an 060. What a pitty
> that there are no vendors donating m68k hardware...
Does anyone know if th
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:52:54AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> An 060, lots of RAM and HDD space and a NIC. See my potato page for some
> links. You can do with an 030 or 040, but you _want_ an 060. What a pitty
> that there are no vendors donating m68k hardware...
Does anyone know if t
> I can't get updated versions of my packages into testing, even if I wanted
> to.
Of course this should have read "I can't get updated versions of my packages
into testing, even though I want to."
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 06:49:24PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies:
>
> > And you will note m68k is not the fastest arch on the world
> > (allthough the nicest ;-)
>
> Hmm, perhaps I should dust off the Amiga 1200 that is lying in a
> desktop drawer¹ doing nothing. Wonder how
Christian T. Steigies:
> And you will note m68k is not the fastest arch on the world
> (allthough the nicest ;-)
Hmm, perhaps I should dust off the Amiga 1200 that is lying in a
desktop drawer¹ doing nothing. Wonder how much I extra stuff I need to
equip it with to get it running Debian and conne
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:26:32AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > If not, during freeze (when presumably the buildds are less busy, once
> > they've caught up), can we get access to these machines to build our
> > non-free and contrib packages?
>
> During the freeze is before the freeze, n
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:45:34AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:40:31AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > [...] After all, non-free is not part of debian AFAIK,
> > thats why the buildds prefer to spend their time on main packages.
>
> This I understand; but, before re
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:40:31AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> [...] After all, non-free is not part of debian AFAIK,
> thats why the buildds prefer to spend their time on main packages.
This I understand; but, before releasing stable (ie during freeze), do
the buildds build non-free and
> I can't get updated versions of my packages into testing, even if I wanted
> to.
Of course this should have read "I can't get updated versions of my packages
into testing, even though I want to."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 06:49:24PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies:
>
> > And you will note m68k is not the fastest arch on the world
> > (allthough the nicest ;-)
>
> Hmm, perhaps I should dust off the Amiga 1200 that is lying in a
> desktop drawer¹ doing nothing. Wonder ho
Christian T. Steigies:
> And you will note m68k is not the fastest arch on the world
> (allthough the nicest ;-)
Hmm, perhaps I should dust off the Amiga 1200 that is lying in a
desktop drawer¹ doing nothing. Wonder how much I extra stuff I need to
equip it with to get it running Debian and conn
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:26:32AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > If not, during freeze (when presumably the buildds are less busy, once
> > they've caught up), can we get access to these machines to build our
> > non-free and contrib packages?
>
> During the freeze is before the freeze,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:45:34AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:40:31AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > [...] After all, non-free is not part of debian AFAIK,
> > thats why the buildds prefer to spend their time on main packages.
>
> This I understand; but, before r
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:40:31AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> [...] After all, non-free is not part of debian AFAIK,
> thats why the buildds prefer to spend their time on main packages.
This I understand; but, before releasing stable (ie during freeze), do
the buildds build non-free an
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:43:14AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> On which machines? The machines list web page says that
> chroot is available on vore.debian.org (sparc). I used it
> to build a sparc port but I could not find other chroot-available
> machines.
>
> machines list: http://db.debi
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:43:14AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> On which machines? The machines list web page says that
> chroot is available on vore.debian.org (sparc). I used it
> to build a sparc port but I could not find other chroot-available
> machines.
>
> machines list: http://db.deb
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:43:14AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> At Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:15:17 -1000,
> Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > However, I checked Debian machines list and found there are no
> > > m68k and arm machines for "woody". How can I build packages
> > > for these
Hi,
At Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:15:17 -1000,
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, I checked Debian machines list and found there are no
> > m68k and arm machines for "woody". How can I build packages
> > for these architectures?
>
> I thought there were chroot's available?
On which m
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 02:05:07AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Thank you. I built packages for powerpc and sparc. Thus, now
> xearth has packages for i386, alpha, powerpc, and sparc.
>
> However, I checked Debian machines list and found there are no
> m68k and arm machines for "woody". How
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:43:14AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> At Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:15:17 -1000,
> Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > However, I checked Debian machines list and found there are no
> > > m68k and arm machines for "woody". How can I build packages
> > > for these
Hi,
At Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:15:17 -1000,
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, I checked Debian machines list and found there are no
> > m68k and arm machines for "woody". How can I build packages
> > for these architectures?
>
> I thought there were chroot's available?
On which
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 02:05:07AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Thank you. I built packages for powerpc and sparc. Thus, now
> xearth has packages for i386, alpha, powerpc, and sparc.
>
> However, I checked Debian machines list and found there are no
> m68k and arm machines for "woody". How
Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 05:24:56PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I uploaded a non-free package xearth at the end of last year for unstable.
> > I uploaded source and binary for i386. However, I cannot see any binaries
> > for other than alpha and i386 in the
Hi,
At Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:46:05 -0500,
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most autobuilders do not build for non-free, simply because they like to
> keep things prinstine for main. If you want to build your package for
> other archs, check the machines listing and login using your Debian
>
Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 05:24:56PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I uploaded a non-free package xearth at the end of last year for unstable.
> > I uploaded source and binary for i386. However, I cannot see any binaries
> > for other than alpha and i386 in th
Hi,
At Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:46:05 -0500,
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most autobuilders do not build for non-free, simply because they like to
> keep things prinstine for main. If you want to build your package for
> other archs, check the machines listing and login using your Debian
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 05:24:56PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded a non-free package xearth at the end of last year for unstable.
> I uploaded source and binary for i386. However, I cannot see any binaries
> for other than alpha and i386 in the package pool so far.
>
> Are th
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 05:24:56PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded a non-free package xearth at the end of last year for unstable.
> I uploaded source and binary for i386. However, I cannot see any binaries
> for other than alpha and i386 in the package pool so far.
>
> Are t
42 matches
Mail list logo
