On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 02:44:03PM -0900, Britton wrote:
>
>
> The 'edited by you or by a script line' which currently gets served up to
> users is apparently not quite in line with policy. It would probably be
> more appropriate to say somethine like 'The configuration file for this
> package h
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 02:44:03PM -0900, Britton wrote:
>
>
> The 'edited by you or by a script line' which currently gets served up to
> users is apparently not quite in line with policy. It would probably be
> more appropriate to say somethine like 'The configuration file for this
> package
The 'edited by you or by a script line' which currently gets served up to
users is apparently not quite in line with policy. It would probably be
more appropriate to say somethine like 'The configuration file for this
package has been modified since the package was installed' or something
like t
The 'edited by you or by a script line' which currently gets served up to
users is apparently not quite in line with policy. It would probably be
more appropriate to say somethine like 'The configuration file for this
package has been modified since the package was installed' or something
like
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If you really think you want to change this automatically, you can ask the
> > squid maintainer to remove /etc/squid.conf from his conffiles.
>
> If it's necessary to remove it fro
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 01:42:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:02:53PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> > It seems this is at odds with policy, which prohibutes the automated
> > editing of conffiles (such as squid.conf). This is a bit ironic, since
> > asking 'Would
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote:
>
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > If you really think you want to change this automatically, you can ask the
> > squid maintainer to remove /etc/squid.conf from his conffiles.
>
> If it's necessary to remove it fr
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 01:42:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:02:53PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> > It seems this is at odds with policy, which prohibutes the automated
> > editing of conffiles (such as squid.conf). This is a bit ironic, since
> > asking 'Would
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you really think you want to change this automatically, you can ask the
> squid maintainer to remove /etc/squid.conf from his conffiles.
If it's necessary to remove it from conffiles in order to edit it from a
script in /usr/sbin, then both sgml
Aaron,
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:02:53PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> It seems this is at odds with policy, which prohibutes the automated
> editing of conffiles (such as squid.conf). This is a bit ironic, since
> asking 'Would you like to enable this package by inserting a line FOO
> into /etc/
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you really think you want to change this automatically, you can ask the
> squid maintainer to remove /etc/squid.conf from his conffiles.
If it's necessary to remove it from conffiles in order to edit it from a
script in /usr/sbin, then both sgm
Aaron,
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:02:53PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> It seems this is at odds with policy, which prohibutes the automated
> editing of conffiles (such as squid.conf). This is a bit ironic, since
> asking 'Would you like to enable this package by inserting a line FOO
> into /etc
12 matches
Mail list logo
