On 15/01/18 19:13, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 06:46:22PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> So: Have anyone time to check my package ddupdate[1] for errors or
>> mistakes?
> The RFS is 1 day old. It's too early to ask.
OK. So, what's an appropriate time to wait before asking?
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 06:46:22PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Following the checklist for new packages on debian mentors FAQ [2] I'm
> approaching the review point: "Ask on the debian-mentors mailing list
> for people to check your packaging..."
>
> So: Have anyone time to check my package ddupda
On So, 29 Sep 2013, Stéphane GALLAND wrote:
> dget link:
> http://download.tuxfamily.org/arakhne/pool/universe/a/autolatex/autolatex_26.2-0arakhne3.dsc
I look into it if time allows - I am in Georgia (country) for teaching
with bad internet connection ...
Norbert
dget link:
http://download.tuxfamily.org/arakhne/pool/universe/a/autolatex/autolatex_26.2-0arakhne3.dsc
Stéphane
Le 29/09/2013 16:14, Norbert Preining a écrit :
On So, 29 Sep 2013, Andrew Shadura wrote:
I think you also may try to get in touch with Debian TeX team (cc'ed)
to discuss the best t
Hello,
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 23:14:46 +0900
Norbert Preining wrote:
> > I think you also may try to get in touch with Debian TeX team
> > (cc'ed) to discuss the best techniques of packaging TeX stuff.
> Please send me a dget-able .dsc link. I will look into it.
http://download.tuxfamily.org/arakh
On So, 29 Sep 2013, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> I think you also may try to get in touch with Debian TeX team (cc'ed)
> to discuss the best techniques of packaging TeX stuff.
Please send me a dget-able .dsc link. I will look into it.
Norbert
--
Hello,
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 14:37:28 +0200
Stéphane GALLAND wrote:
> Thanks for the remark. I just changed the documentations of AutoLaTeX
> according to the remark of Andrew.
> I'm really interesting if the way how I packaged AutoLaTeX is the
> best one according to the Debian way-of-life. The
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:42:28 +0200
Stéphane GALLAND wrote:
> I written a set of packages for the AutoLaTeX building tool
> (http://www.arakhne.org/autolatex/).
> The packages are written and tested on Ubuntu.
> They are available from
> http://download.tuxfamily.org/arakhne/pool/univers
Frank Küster wrote:
You should try to separate non-debian-specific and debian-specific
parts, IMO.
I have been trying to keep to standard Bourne Shell so it should be ok.
I will try to package it in a normal tar file with (bin, etc, etc)
not exist or something like this. I ended up having to
Frank Küster wrote:
You should try to separate non-debian-specific and debian-specific
parts, IMO.
I have been trying to keep to standard Bourne Shell so it should be ok.
I will try to package it in a normal tar file with (bin, etc, etc)
not exist or something like this. I ended up having to put A
Bengt Thuree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That depends on the complexity of the installation. In most cases,
>> it is
>> highly advisable to have a separate Makefile that does the compilation
>> and installation, and in debian/rules you only call it with appropriate
>> targets and arguments.
> ok
Bengt Thuree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That depends on the complexity of the installation. In most cases,
>> it is
>> highly advisable to have a separate Makefile that does the compilation
>> and installation, and in debian/rules you only call it with appropriate
>> targets and arguments.
> ok
>>> for the buppo --version output. And I think it would be handled by cvs
>> or subversion, but for the moment I am actually using .deb as my
>> revision control
>
> OK, so you do actually want to have your version information generated
> automatically from your revision control stuff.
:-) Th
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 09:01:34AM +0900, Bengt Thuree wrote:
> >The version of the debian package you produce is taken from the package's
> >topmost changelog entry. For timestamps, you can use touch(1), but I'm
> >having trouble coming up with why you'd want to stamp a file to a
> >particular
>
>>> for the buppo --version output. And I think it would be handled by cvs
>> or subversion, but for the moment I am actually using .deb as my
>> revision control
>
> OK, so you do actually want to have your version information generated
> automatically from your revision control stuff.
:-) Th
Matthew Palmer wrote:
want to move some files in your debian/rules file - a typical example
would be moving some scripts to
debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/$packagename/examples.
You don't use dh_installdirs for that, you use dh_installexamples.
I managed to use this one :)
*) Should I list
Hej Frank,
and thank you for very much appreciated comments.
I will try to answer them below
/Bengt
Frank Küster wrote:
Did you read the new maintainers guide and the developers' reference?
Yes, I read them once, twice, and ten times, but must have some problem
with my english apperantly.
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 09:01:34AM +0900, Bengt Thuree wrote:
> >The version of the debian package you produce is taken from the package's
> >topmost changelog entry. For timestamps, you can use touch(1), but I'm
> >having trouble coming up with why you'd want to stamp a file to a
> >particular
>
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 05:17:45PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> In debian/dirs, you only list the directories that you want to create
> with dh_installdirs - e.g. directories that the upstream Makefiles
> assumes to be present upon installation, or directories to which you
> want to move some files
Matthew Palmer wrote:
want to move some files in your debian/rules file - a typical example
would be moving some scripts to
debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/$packagename/examples.
You don't use dh_installdirs for that, you use dh_installexamples.
I managed to use this one :)
*) Should I list the conffil
Hej Frank,
and thank you for very much appreciated comments.
I will try to answer them below
/Bengt
Frank Küster wrote:
Did you read the new maintainers guide and the developers' reference?
Yes, I read them once, twice, and ten times, but must have some problem
with my english apperantly.
That de
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 05:17:45PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> In debian/dirs, you only list the directories that you want to create
> with dh_installdirs - e.g. directories that the upstream Makefiles
> assumes to be present upon installation, or directories to which you
> want to move some files
Bengt Thuree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hej
>
> I have just created one of my first debian package, and would like to
> have some comments on the actual packaging.
Did you read the new maintainers guide and the developers' reference?
>
> Have I missed something?
> I am very confused of
> *)
Bengt Thuree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hej
>
> I have just created one of my first debian package, and would like to
> have some comments on the actual packaging.
Did you read the new maintainers guide and the developers' reference?
>
> Have I missed something?
> I am very confused of
> *)
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 12:32:15AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 12:30:15AM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > OTOH, please fix your mail client, I received your message 3 (!) times.
>
> Suggest you fix yours.. I only saw one copy here, and twice today
> I've seen you t
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 12:32:15AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 12:30:15AM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > OTOH, please fix your mail client, I received your message 3 (!) times.
>
> Suggest you fix yours.. I only saw one copy here, and twice today
> I've seen you
On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 12:30:15AM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> OTOH, please fix your mail client, I received your message 3 (!) times.
Suggest you fix yours.. I only saw one copy here, and twice today
I've seen you tell people you received multiple copies of their message.
cheers
Hamish
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 03:04:18PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Does anyone have any links for ECN stuff with relation to Cisco routers
> > as my sysadmin at school does not know what E
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 03:04:18PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Does anyone have any links for ECN stuff with relation to Cisco routers
> as my sysadmin at school does not know what ECN is.
> Warren
See
http://www.aciri.org/floyd/ecn.html
a
Warren Turkal wrote:
> Does anyone have any links for ECN stuff with relation to Cisco routers
> as my sysadmin at school does not know what ECN is.
http://www.aciri.org/floyd/ecn.html
ECN (Explicit Congestion Notification) in TCP/IP
which has a link to:
http://gtf.org/garzik/ecn/
ECN-und
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 03:04:18PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Does anyone have any links for ECN stuff with relation to Cisco routers
> as my sysadmin at school does not know what ECN is.
> Warren
See
http://www.aciri.org/floyd/ecn.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does anyone have any links for ECN stuff with relation to Cisco routers
as my sysadmin at school does not know what ECN is.
Warren
On Friday 02 November 2001 05:41 am, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Please inform the administrators of your server (www.
Warren Turkal wrote:
> Does anyone have any links for ECN stuff with relation to Cisco routers
> as my sysadmin at school does not know what ECN is.
http://www.aciri.org/floyd/ecn.html
ECN (Explicit Congestion Notification) in TCP/IP
which has a link to:
http://gtf.org/garzik/ecn/
ECN-un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does anyone have any links for ECN stuff with relation to Cisco routers
as my sysadmin at school does not know what ECN is.
Warren
On Friday 02 November 2001 05:41 am, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Please inform the administrators of your server (www
Please inform the administrators of your server (www.cbu.edu) that their router
is broken. It rejects ECN enabled.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:52:18PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Could someone please take a look at my package for uml at:
> http
Please inform the administrators of your server (www.cbu.edu) that their router
is broken. It rejects ECN enabled.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:52:18PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Could someone please take a look at my package for uml at:
> htt
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 02:05:45AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > You have set your Standards-Version line to 3.1.1 but you don't
> > > have a Build-Depends line. At the very least, your package is going
> > > to have a build dependency on debstd, and probably others.
> >
> > switc
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 06:43:20PM +, michael d. ivey wrote:
> > You have set your Standards-Version line to 3.1.1 but you don't
> > have a Build-Depends line. At the very least, your package is going
> > to have a build dependency on debstd, and probably others.
>
> switched to 3.0.1
38 matches
Mail list logo
