On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:00:23PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
RFS has something similar in concept to pull requests. How about including in
the RFS emails a link to the most relevant diff in the web inte
Le Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:00:23PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia a écrit :
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
>>
>> RFS has something similar in concept to pull requests. How about including in
>> the RFS emails a link to the most relevant diff in the web interface of the
>> VCS
>> where the pac
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
[...]
One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of packages
that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people "please review some package" is
pretty awkward...
Best regards,
Michael
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
I think this is a superb step in the right direction; while clearly the list on
mentors.debian.net, as suggested in another email in this thread, is the more
comprehensive list of
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:49:25AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Personally I believe that Noel's statement is relates to upstream,
> who have their own packaging + their own little repository as
> compared to upstreams like you, who also work on the Debian side.
[...]
Which was more or less my po
> Perhaps (hopefully) this initiative will change the culture of this
> list. I'll certainly try to remember to point out when people are
> ignoring non-DDs input.
>
Me too, probably I'll even refrain from sponsoring should I note such behavior.
Best regards,
Michael
pgpWQgPPBsI8a.pgp
Descrip
Perhaps (hopefully) this initiative will change the culture of this
list. I'll certainly try to remember to point out when people are
ignoring non-DDs input.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Unfortunately, proposals such as the collaborative package review by Charles
> Plessy [2] haven't caught any attention. In particular, this is a call to
> people
> not being DD (yet): Everyone could review packages, but it just
Le Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
>
> I think this is a superb step in the right direction; while clearly the list
> on
> mentors.debian.net, as suggested in another email in this thread, is the more
> comprehensive list of packages in need of sponsorship, thi
[...]
>
> I liked the idea of requesting reviews from people whose packages will get
> sponsored; but I'd just ask for doing that voluntarily. I probably should have
> taken the chance to ask people for doing so yesterday, maybe I'll even send
> those people another email.
>
[...]
Done as [1].
> On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of
> > packages
> > that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people "please review some
> > package" is
> > pretty awkward...
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Michael
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-10-30 02:16, The Fungi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:44:37PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> [...]
>> Is it always an upstream package worst than a repackaged package?
> [...]
>
>>From what I've seen, in most cases, yes.
>
> I
Quoting "Michael Tautschnig" :
Hi Michael,
I liked the idea of requesting reviews from people whose packages will get
sponsored; but I'd just ask for doing that voluntarily. I probably
should have
taken the chance to ask people for doing so yesterday, maybe I'll even send
those people anothe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-10-30 08:59, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
>
> One technical question, however, remains: Could we have some list of packages
> that remain to be reviewed? Just telling people "please review some package"
> is
> pretty awkward...
>
> Bes
Hello,
On Friday 29 October 2010 at 20:13:21, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
> On Viernes 29 Octubre 2010 08:34:25 Paul Wise escribió:
[...]
> > I think I'll also do a workshop about reviewing packages at the
> > MiniDebConf in Vietnam. Does anyone think that an online workshop (IRC
> > or similar)
[...]
> >
> > Hmm, how can we encourage non-DDs to review packages.
> >
> > I'm thinking it might work to offer sponsorship in exchange for
> > reviews. So, a DD reviews a package from maintainer. If there are no
> > blockers to the upload, the DD says, "looks good, review someone elses
> > pack
Noel David Torres Taño writes:
> On Viernes 29 Octubre 2010 22:05:40 Ben Finney escribió:
> > Noel David Torres Taño writes:
> > > That person creates the Debian package (as he creates packages for
> > > other distros) and puts it here. It is a good package of a good
> > > app, and he will have
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:44:37PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
[...]
> Is it always an upstream package worst than a repackaged package?
[...]
>From what I've seen, in most cases, yes.
I am one of the guilty "one pet package" upstream authors who gets
my Debian work uploaded by a graciou
On Viernes 29 Octubre 2010 22:05:40 Ben Finney escribió:
> Noel David Torres Taño writes:
> > I see a small problem with this, and it is the following: imagine that
> > somebody packages a useful application. He has no special interest in
> > Debian, but only in that application, and it is an appl
Noel David Torres Taño writes:
> I see a small problem with this, and it is the following: imagine that
> somebody packages a useful application. He has no special interest in
> Debian, but only in that application, and it is an application we
> consider worth enough to have in Debian.
I see tha
On Viernes 29 Octubre 2010 08:34:25 Paul Wise escribió:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > So this was the first time I dragged together such a list, and most
> > probably it will already be the last time. It just takes way too much
> > time and feels pretty much like
On 10/29/2010 03:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> I think I'll also do a workshop about reviewing packages at the
> MiniDebConf in Vietnam. Does anyone think that an online workshop (IRC
> or similar) about package review would be helpful?
>
Paul,
I'll try to bring my DVD cam, so we can film all works
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> So this was the first time I dragged together such a list, and most probably
> it
> will already be the last time. It just takes way too much time and feels
> pretty
> much like a Sisyphus task as people just keep sending RFS with ver
23 matches
Mail list logo
