Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?

Hi, On 2023-06-20 17:15, Ramūnas Keliuotis wrote: 4. Also, we are using our own open source rust libraries https://github.com/NordSecurity/libtelio https://github.com/NordSecurity/libdrop Maybe there is there a Debin Rust packaging team as well? Yes, there is Debian Rust packaging team [1]. Ac

Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?

Ramūnas Keliuotis writes: > Hi, > > Thank you for the information, I was looking through Debian guides for a > while. > Will review your given links as well. > > Now I need answers to questions: > 1. Is it ok for source code to be in Github? or do I need a Salsa > account? If you're asking if e

Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?

Hi, > Is it ok for source code to be in Github? No. In my opinion (and I am aware that sadly, the majority of the project probably does not share this opinion), that is a direct violation of Debian's Code of Conduct, and its Social Contract as well. GitHub has discriminatory terms of use that

Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:15:05PM +0300, Ramūnas Keliuotis wrote: > 1. Is it ok for source code to be in Github? or do I need a Salsa account? It is OK for the source code to not have a VCS at all. It's also OK for the packaging to not have a VCS at all, and these are two separate questions, and p

Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?

Hi, Thank you for the information, I was looking through Debian guides for a while. Will review your given links as well. Now I need answers to questions: 1. Is it ok for source code to be in Github? or do I need a Salsa account? 2. Do I need to create a source package? *.dsc 3. How to implement

Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?

Nice, You can take a look here now: در سه‌شنبه, ژوئن 20 2023 at ۱۵:۴۹:۴۲ +03:00:00, Ramūnas Keliuotis نوشته بود: Hello, Ok, thank you. Just submitted an ITP request: Now I expect we sh

Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?

Hello Ramunas Keliuotis, Here are some manuals and guides that you can use to prepare your package. [1] [2] As I see the source code primarily consists of Golang code, Debian Go Packaging team [3] would be something you might be interested on. Once you finish preparing your package, you'll

Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?

Hello, Ok, thank you. Just submitted an ITP request: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038718 Now I expect we should wait for attention from debian developer/maintainer volunteers and get information on how to start the packaging process. Or please let me know how to proceed to t

Re: New package: ITP or RFP ?

On 20.06.2023 13:34, Ramūnas Keliuotis wrote: Hi, We just opensourced our NordVPN Linux application and want to make it available from the public Debian repository. As we are planning to do packaging and support by ourselves, it is still not clear how to properly go through the Debian packaging

Re: New package - i3lock-color

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 06:17:34PM -0400, Raymond Li wrote: > Hi, > > I maintain a popular lockscreen called i3lock-color. I've filed an ITP for > it and have a .deb package ready. I need a .changes file to use dput to > upload it to the mentors thinggy, but I have no idea how to get that file > o

Re: new package to the archive

2014-02-01 C@rlos : > thanks for the Recommended, I will work on that, but also need to know, then > there are no problems, how can upload the application to repositories? > Once the packaging issues are cleaned up, you will need a sponsor to upload it to the archives. The "sponsors" page on ment

Re: new package to the archive

2014-02-01 C@rlos : > I have programmed an application in python + qt, I packaged as an > application of debian, I would like to upload my application to repositories > of debian and ubuntu, is under gpl license and is at this address: > https://github.com/onlyOneUci/OnlyOne > > -- > Conserva lo qu

Re: new package to the archive

Hi Carlos, A Debian package must be uploaded with the source code. Your package has several problems, as no long description and specific dependencies to Ubuntu. $ dpkg -I /tmp/onlyone-1.0.0_all.deb novo pacote debian, versão 2.0. 323770 bytes de tamanho: arquivo de controle=424 bytes. 409

Re: new package build

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Yves Jeanrenaud wrote: > What package would you suggest to add it? I'm not entirely sure, but perhaps coreutils, moreutils or debianutils would be the appropriate place. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-r

Re: new package build

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Yves Jeanrenaud wrote: > I built my first package, a small binary telling you what endianness your > system got. Now I would kindly like to ask if anyone would be so nice to > help me out on how to submit this to the debian archives. dpkg already does that, so eve

Re: New Package: Lejos NXJ

On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 09:38 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Chris Baines wrote: > > > Secondly, I have little understanding of the usb permissions on Debian. > > I have done some basic tests and the device can't be accessed without > > root permissions on a standard ins

Re: New Package: Lejos NXJ

On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 22:10 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2010-07-20 20:14, Chris Baines wrote: > > Hello, > > > > My name is Chris and I have just started using Debian. I would like to > > build a Debian package for the Lejos NXJ project >

Re: New Package: Lejos NXJ

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Chris Baines wrote: > Secondly, I have little understanding of the usb permissions on Debian. > I have done some basic tests and the device can't be accessed without > root permissions on a standard installation of Debian. The project > readme says: >        To us

Re: New Package: Lejos NXJ

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-07-20 20:14, Chris Baines wrote: > Hello, > > My name is Chris and I have just started using Debian. I would like to > build a Debian package for the Lejos NXJ project > (http://lejos.sourceforge.net/). Its a replacement firmware and java ap

Re: New package for pmgraph

At Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:21:58 +0100, Noe Gonzalez wrote: >I have just started to work with debian packages building, I create a > package for the project pmgraph. The package is main to install the war > file of the pmgraph project create a mysql database, and install and > configure some extra

Re: New package : aodv-uu / looking for a mentor

Hi Fabien, On Saturday 30 August 2008 16:22, Fabien Cellier wrote: > I mean that it *could* be the best implementation of rfc3561. Ok :) > I cannot answer this. I personally used it successfully with 3 > computers. For largest scale test, please refer to upstream author. Ok. (I probably wont do

Re: New package : aodv-uu / looking for a mentor

Stefan Ott a écrit : On Saturday 30 August 2008 02:15, Fabien Cellier wrote: This is a routing protocol based on RFC3561 for Ad-Hoc networks. This implementation seems to be the "best" available. (Why) do you think it is the best protocol for ad-hoc networks? Or do you mean this program is th

Re: New package : aodv-uu / looking for a mentor

>> >> On Saturday 30 August 2008 02:15, Fabien Cellier wrote: >>> >>> This is a routing protocol based on RFC3561 for Ad-Hoc networks. This >>> implementation seems to be the "best" available. >> >> (Why) do you think it is the best protocol for ad-hoc networks? Or do you >> mean this program is th

Re: New package : aodv-uu / looking for a mentor

Hi Fabien, On Saturday 30 August 2008 02:15, Fabien Cellier wrote: This is a routing protocol based on RFC3561 for Ad-Hoc networks. This implementation seems to be the "best" available. (Why) do you think it is the best protocol for ad-hoc networks? Or do you mean this program is the best i

Re: New package : aodv-uu / looking for a mentor

Hi Fabien, On Saturday 30 August 2008 02:15, Fabien Cellier wrote: > This is a routing protocol based on RFC3561 for Ad-Hoc networks. This > implementation seems to be the "best" available. (Why) do you think it is the best protocol for ad-hoc networks? Or do you mean this program is the best im

Re: New package : aodv-uu / looking for a mentor

Hello again, I just managed to upload my aodv-uu package on mentors.debian.net. I also picked up the magic template : From: Fabien Cellier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: aodv-uu Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aodv-uu". * Packag

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

"Hans-J. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message I think, Linux should be fun, so the work will get best quality. On that you are definately not alone. Linus Torvalds himself agrees, as does nearly everybody involved with this project. However, even fun things can be frustrating on occa

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

Hi, On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:54 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Thank you very much for your help ! My packages are now uploaded and > can be > tested or changed, whatever. I am not a DD (yet) so I cannot upload your package. Here are some problems/remarks I noticed after a (very) quick look:

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

Felipe Sateler > > So I am not the only "dump" man among the professionels in this area. Good to > know ! Meanwhile I managed to load up my package. I suppose, someone will > check this now (or not) and I have to wait, if there will be feedback. it's more easy if you post a RFS template on th

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 schrieb Leo "costela" Antunes: > Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > >> If you don't want to be the maintainer for the package, and instead only > >> want to have it packaged, you can file a RFP (request for package) bug > >> to the package 'wnpp'. > >> Simply using 'reportbug wn

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > Yes, I gave up. I had the feeling, no one was interested in new packages > > at all, so I gave up. And yes, I had no fun and the package worked on my > > system > > The first steps in the mentoring process are us

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > Yes, I gave up. I had the feeling, no one was interested in new packages > at all, so I gave up. And yes, I had no fun and the package worked on my > system The first steps in the mentoring process are usually the most frustrating ones: you post questins and/or packag

Re: New package "unicornscan" (a new try !)

> You need to use ftp, rather than scp to upload to mentors > here is my dupload.conf. I think the default must be ftp, because I > don't see anything here to force ftp. Here is my .dupload.conf > > package config; > > $cfg{'mentors'} = > { >fqdn => 'mentors.debian.net', >incoming

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: >> If you don't want to be the maintainer for the package, and instead only >> want to have it packaged, you can file a RFP (request for package) bug >> to the package 'wnpp'. >> Simply using 'reportbug wnpp' and filling in the proper fields should be >> enough. It should gui

Re: New package "unicornscan" (a new try !)

Hans-J> dupload -t mentors unicornscan_0.4.7-1_amd64.changes Hans-J> Uploading (scp) to mentors.debian.net:~ You need to use ftp, rather than scp to upload to mentors here is my dupload.conf. I think the default must be ftp, because I don't see anything here to force ftp. Here is my

Re: New package "unicornscan" (a new try !)

Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 schrieb Leo "costela" Antunes: > Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > I suppose, this is all to difficult and complicated for me. As the > > package is new, I get MD5-errors and more. So, as this process is too > > difficult for me, and is taking to much of long time, I give up.

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 schrieb Leo "costela" Antunes: > Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > > I suppose, this is all to difficult and complicated for me. As the > > package is new, I get MD5-errors and more. So, as this process is too > > difficult for me, and is taking to much of long time, I give up.

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: I was just intend to take part in the community, but it seem not to work. And please: Do not write me, "read here", "read there", "read somewhere!", really, for some few questions, I am not willing to read hours lots of stuff. Too bad! reading all this stuff (which has

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > I suppose, this is all to difficult and complicated for me. As the package is > new, I get MD5-errors and more. So, as this process is too difficult for me, > and is taking to much of long time, I give up. Sorry to hear that. > Sorry, I am not willing to collect all the

Re: New Package PVFS

On Tuesday 15 May 2007 19:04:05 David Brown wrote: > I was developing a set of debian packages for pvfs > (http://www.pvfs.org/) and was wondering if anyone could take a look > at it and see if I'm missing anything important. Attached is the > gziped diff to create the debian directory and the tarb

Re: new package splix

El vie, 16-02-2007 a las 17:29 +0200, Damyan Ivanov escribió: > -=| Carlos Pasqualini, 16.02.2007 16:49 |=- > >> Next, you upload the source package (.dsc, .orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz) > >> somewhere and ask on this list for someone to review it. > > > > i use the provided tar.bz2 with the default comp

Re: new package splix

-=| Carlos Pasqualini, 16.02.2007 16:49 |=- >> Next, you upload the source package (.dsc, .orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz) >> somewhere and ask on this list for someone to review it. > > i use the provided tar.bz2 with the default compilation options on my > i386 PC. > i must learn what i must change (if i

Re: new package splix

On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:41:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:09 -0300, Carlos Pasqualini wrote: > > [ slightly confusing description ] > > I do not understand the situation with this package. You do claim to > support some SPL printers, but the last sentence asks for

Re: new package splix

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:09 -0300, Carlos Pasqualini wrote: >SpliX is a set of CUPS printer drivers for SPL (Samsung Printer > Language) printers. If you have a such printer, you need to install > and use SpliX. Moreover you will find documentation about this > proprietary language on the splix

Re: new package splix

Hi, Carlos, -=| Carlos Pasqualini, 15.02.2007 23:09 |=- > i found a package called splix, it has no deb available. > This driver works much better than GDI for my Samsung ML-2010 printer, sounds cool. > SOMEBODY TELL ME WHAT'S NEXT!! No need to yell, we all hear pretty well :) Next, you uploa

Re: new package with an epoch

Hi, * Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-27 07:12]: > I am planning ot upload a package which I have been maintaining > for a local archive for several years already. I intended to > keep the old changelogs as a record of the work that has been > done on the package, however there is one

Re: new package with an epoch

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, martin f krafft wrote: You've just answered your own question, no? If you really think you have other users, use an epoch. It's ugly, but it works. If you don't have other users, go through the changelog and prepend 0.0. to all existing versions. :) Had to do some thin

Re: new package with an epoch

also sprach Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.27.0649 +0200]: > package versioning in such a way that I had to apply an epoch. Would it > be better for me to just drop the old changelogs and the eopch for the > first archive upload? I will risk breaking upgrades for the current users >

Re: new package wmbattmon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nico Golde schrieb: > Hi, * Michael Andraschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-18 > 08:55]: > >> therefore the programm has a config file were all these things >> can be adjusted after installation if they dont work with the >> paths specified in

Re: new package wmbattmon

Hi, * Michael Andraschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-18 08:55]: > therefore the programm has a config file were all these things can be > adjusted after installation if they dont work with the paths specified in > the program. Yes saw this but imho its not a user thing to work through the proc fi

Re: new package wmbattmon

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi therefore the programm has a config file were all these things can be adjusted after installation if they dont work with the paths specified in the program. - --micha Nico Golde schrieb: > Hi, * Michael Andraschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-17

Re: new package wmbattmon

Hi, * Michael Andraschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-17 23:11]: [...] > fara.cs.uni-potsdam.de/~mandrasc/wmbattmon > > I'm looking for a sponsor, if someone is interested, please contact me. As talked about bugs in latest mail I have to tell now that this program is crap. Hardcoded paths like:

Re: new package wmbattmon

Hi, * Michael Andraschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-17 23:11]: [...] > It can be reached at: > > fara.cs.uni-potsdam.de/~mandrasc/wmbattmon [...] First bug, shows wrong information on my system where yacpi and acpi show the right :) If you want I can send you a tarball of my proc/acpi files

Re: new package

On 7/2/05, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, I've taken another stab at it. There are no lintian or linda errors now. > > All packages are located at clamtk.sourceforge.net/debian/2.01-3/ . > > > > Thank you for your time and help! > > Daniel Holbach packaged this one in the mean

Re: new package

> Ok, I've taken another stab at it. There are no lintian or linda errors now. > All packages are located at clamtk.sourceforge.net/debian/2.01-3/ . > > Thank you for your time and help! Daniel Holbach packaged this one in the meantime for ubuntu. You can grab his package from here: http://sireta

Re: new package

> The most useful thing for us to look at is the .diff.gz. The .deb is > just a binary blob, and its difficult to judge it without knowing what > the .orig. and the .diff. look like. Also, the binary blob, if > installed, and not first hand-inspected, is untrusted input; it > contains shell scrip

Re: new package

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 07:41:35AM -0500, Dave M wrote: > Hello, > > Anyway, I'm open to suggestions, comments, and criticisms. The > homepage is here: clamtk.sourceforge.net, and the .deb and > orig.tar.gz files are located here: clamtk.sourceforge.net/dev/. The most useful thing for us to look a

Re: New Package: stellarium

Lots of thanks, I found that info extremelly useful. Even when it is a great program, the program has to go to non-free: "Stellarium has been moved in section non-free to close bug #198495 (Please clarify copyright license of astronomical data used by this software). Please look at the copyright f

Re: New Package: stellarium

--- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0100, Miriam > Ruiz wrote: > > I've just made a new package: Stellarium Astronomy > > Software > Hi Miriam, > > You might also be interested in SkyChart: > http://handhelds.freshmeat.net/projects/skychart/ > >

Re: New Package: stellarium

On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 02:43:31AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > I've just made a new package: Stellarium Astronomy > Software Hi Miriam, You might also be interested in SkyChart: http://handhelds.freshmeat.net/projects/skychart/ Its by the author of Cartes du Ciel, which is pretty well known and e

Re: New Package: stellarium

On Sat, 01 Jan 2005, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > Thanks, i'll try to find it. I couldn't find it in > http://packages.debian.org/, and the only package i > found for that program is an old version in > www.apt-get.org. http://snapshot.debian.org: http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2003/09/15/debian/pool

Re: New Package: stellarium

--- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Sat, 01 Jan 2005, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > I've just made a new package: Stellarium Astronomy > > Software > > Stellarium was once on Debian, maybe you should have > a look on the old > package just in case. Especially the changel

Re: New Package: stellarium

On Sat, 01 Jan 2005, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > I've just made a new package: Stellarium Astronomy > Software Stellarium was once on Debian, maybe you should have a look on the old package just in case. Especially the changelogs, and any patches. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them

Re: New package howto?

* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-15 00:07]: > * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-15 00:05]: > > also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.14.2353 +0200]: > > > yes, rfp means request for package, people send this because they want > > > to have a program packaged. if

Re: New package howto?

Hello martin, * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-15 00:05]: > also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.14.2353 +0200]: > > yes, rfp means request for package, people send this because they want > > to have a program packaged. if you want to package it, send an itp > > (inten

Re: New package howto?

also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.14.2353 +0200]: > yes, rfp means request for package, people send this because they want > to have a program packaged. if you want to package it, send an itp > (intent to package), package it and close the bug after the upload (do > it in the chan

Re: New package howto?

Miguel, Please make sure you understand what I just told you. Thus, please surf to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control and http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ and read both. Then reply to me privately and explain to me what each of the four commands does. That said, I think you shou

Re: New package howto?

Hello MiguelGea, * MiguelGea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-14 23:44]: > I found a RFP: > Debian Bug report logs - #250538 > RFP: libmatheval -- GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical > expressions > > I'm not a DD, but I want to package it. must I send a ITP? this must > follow #250538 b

Re: New package howto?

also sprach MiguelGea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.14.2323 +0200]: > I'm not a DD, but I want to package it. must I send a ITP? this must > follow #250538 bug? Please retitle the book to an ITP and set yourself as owner by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following contents: package wnpp retitl

Re: New package howto?

You should retitle that bug to an ITP. Justin On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 11:23:49PM +0200, MiguelGea wrote: > Hello mentors, > I found a RFP: > Debian Bug report logs - #250538 > RFP: libmatheval -- GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical > expressions > > I'm not a DD, but I want to package

Re: New package howto?

* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-15 00:07]: > * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-15 00:05]: > > also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.14.2353 +0200]: > > > yes, rfp means request for package, people send this because they want > > > to have a program packaged. if

Re: New package howto?

Hello martin, * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-15 00:05]: > also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.14.2353 +0200]: > > yes, rfp means request for package, people send this because they want > > to have a program packaged. if you want to package it, send an itp > > (inten

Re: New package howto?

also sprach Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.14.2353 +0200]: > yes, rfp means request for package, people send this because they want > to have a program packaged. if you want to package it, send an itp > (intent to package), package it and close the bug after the upload (do > it in the chan

Re: New package howto?

Miguel, Please make sure you understand what I just told you. Thus, please surf to http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control and http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ and read both. Then reply to me privately and explain to me what each of the four commands does. That said, I think you shou

Re: New package howto?

Hello MiguelGea, * MiguelGea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-14 23:44]: > I found a RFP: > Debian Bug report logs - #250538 > RFP: libmatheval -- GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical > expressions > > I'm not a DD, but I want to package it. must I send a ITP? this must > follow #250538 b

Re: New package howto?

also sprach MiguelGea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.14.2323 +0200]: > I'm not a DD, but I want to package it. must I send a ITP? this must > follow #250538 bug? Please retitle the book to an ITP and set yourself as owner by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following contents: package wnpp retitl

Re: New package howto?

You should retitle that bug to an ITP. Justin On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 11:23:49PM +0200, MiguelGea wrote: > Hello mentors, > I found a RFP: > Debian Bug report logs - #250538 > RFP: libmatheval -- GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical > expressions > > I'm not a DD, but I want to package

Re: New Package Maintainer

wils wrote: > Greetings, my name is Mark Wilson (Wils if you like), i am in the > early days of my quest to be a "package maintainer". Welcome! Please see this page for some useful information: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html The people.debian.org server may not be

Re: New Package Maintainer

wils wrote: > Greetings, my name is Mark Wilson (Wils if you like), i am in the > early days of my quest to be a "package maintainer". Welcome! Please see this page for some useful information: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html The people.debian.org server may not be

Re: New Package (need final help)

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:29:01PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > How can I test for these failures? I'm sure it did go cleanly through a > > full rebuild. > > I'm sure it did on your system. pbuilder (or a minimal chroot of your > choice) should help find such problems. Thanks for the hint. I w

Re: New Package (need final help)

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:29:01PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > How can I test for these failures? I'm sure it did go cleanly through a > > full rebuild. > > I'm sure it did on your system. pbuilder (or a minimal chroot of your > choice) should help find such problems. Thanks for the hint. I w

Re: New Package (need final help)

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 14:24, Tom wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:09:57PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > I now have these packages sitting on my server at > > > http://nox.lemuria.org/debian/ > > > > I get permission denied for scorched3d_0.36.2.orig.tar.gz. > > Fixed. Thanks, same prob

Re: New Package (need final help)

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 14:24, Tom wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:09:57PM +0100, Michel DÃnzer wrote: > > > I now have these packages sitting on my server at > > > http://nox.lemuria.org/debian/ > > > > I get permission denied for scorched3d_0.36.2.orig.tar.gz. > > Fixed. Thanks, same prob

Re: New Package (need final help)

(I am on the list, btw. No need to CC me) On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:09:57PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > I now have these packages sitting on my server at > > http://nox.lemuria.org/debian/ > > I get permission denied for scorched3d_0.36.2.orig.tar.gz. Fixed. > 0.36.1 fails to build becau

Re: New Package (need final help)

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 10:40, Tom wrote: > > I now have these packages sitting on my server at > http://nox.lemuria.org/debian/ I get permission denied for scorched3d_0.36.2.orig.tar.gz. 0.36.1 fails to build because it doesn't run configure. Removing config.status in the clean target fixes that,

Re: New Package (need final help)

(I am on the list, btw. No need to CC me) On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:09:57PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > I now have these packages sitting on my server at > > http://nox.lemuria.org/debian/ > > I get permission denied for scorched3d_0.36.2.orig.tar.gz. Fixed. > 0.36.1 fails to build becau

Re: New Package (need final help)

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 10:40, Tom wrote: > > I now have these packages sitting on my server at > http://nox.lemuria.org/debian/ I get permission denied for scorched3d_0.36.2.orig.tar.gz. 0.36.1 fails to build because it doesn't run configure. Removing config.status in the clean target fixes that,

Re: New Package (need final help)

Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alternatively, how do I create the Packages.gz file found on archive > sites, so people can apt-get from my server instead of downloading > manually? I've done this previously like this: 1. Create .override file into your package directory 2. In the package direct

Re: New Package (need final help)

Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alternatively, how do I create the Packages.gz file found on archive > sites, so people can apt-get from my server instead of downloading > manually? I've done this previously like this: 1. Create .override file into your package directory 2. In the package direct

Re: New Package (need final help)

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:40:04AM +0100, Tom wrote: > Alternatively, how do I create the Packages.gz file found on archive > sites, so people can apt-get from my server instead of downloading > manually? Check http://mentors.debian.net service. It's designed for such purposes. You can create an ac

Re: New Package (need final help)

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:40:04AM +0100, Tom wrote: > Alternatively, how do I create the Packages.gz file found on archive > sites, so people can apt-get from my server instead of downloading > manually? Check http://mentors.debian.net service. It's designed for such purposes. You can create an ac

Re: Antwort: Re: new package - don't know how to compile

"Matthias Hofer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html Please send only plain text email to the mailing list. >> >what can I do? >> >> I think this means that you need (a more recent version of) GNU > automake. >> What version do you have, if an

Antwort: Re: new package - don't know how to compile

> >    what can I do? > > I think this means that you need (a more recent version of) GNU automake. > What version do you have, if any? I have 1.4-p4-1.1 (from woody).   > BTW, if you haven't been able to compile it, why do you say it is the best > package for HA under GNU?  Debian already has s

Re: new package - don't know how to compile

"Matthias Hofer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But i've problems to compile failsafe-mgr, the graphical GUI (written in > Java) for configuring the cluster. > There is no configure-script out of the box, the doc says to give > > aclocal > autoheader > automake --add-missing > auto

Re: new package - don't know how to compile

On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:22:48AM +0200, Matthias Hofer wrote: >./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc > >but when I after all give "./configure", the is an error: > >loading cache ./config.cache >./configure: line 534: syntax error near unexpected token >`AM_INIT_AU

Re: new package - don't know how to compile

> what can I do? I do not recognise the error, I would suggest you try a crash test in the GNU/autotools, which is never a bad idea for a develper anyway. This is an overview: http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/downloads/athens-opensource-0.4.pdf -- greetz, marc because of net

Re: New package accessable using dselect or apt-get

> "Matt" == Matt Flax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Matt> deb http://mffm.darktech.org/flatmax/debian/ ./ deb-src Matt> http://mffm.darktech.org/flatmax/debian/ ./ Matt> The package is a C++ wrapper for the fftw.org FFT library. Matt> It is a very usefull wrapper and has popular

Re: New package accessable using dselect or apt-get

> "Matt" == Matt Flax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Matt> deb http://mffm.darktech.org/flatmax/debian/ ./ deb-src Matt> http://mffm.darktech.org/flatmax/debian/ ./ Matt> The package is a C++ wrapper for the fftw.org FFT library. Matt> It is a very usefull wrapper and has popular

Re: new package name for gtk-engines-mgicchikn

On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 01:55:47PM +0100, Sebastian Henschel wrote: > hello sven.. > > Received at 2002-11-27 / 09:01 by Sven Luther: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:17:54PM +0100, Sebastian Henschel wrote: > > > > > > i am currently adopting the package "gtk-engines-mgicchikn", > > > whereas one

Re: new package name for gtk-engines-mgicchikn

hello sven.. Received at 2002-11-27 / 09:01 by Sven Luther: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:17:54PM +0100, Sebastian Henschel wrote: > > > > i am currently adopting the package "gtk-engines-mgicchikn", > > whereas one task is to rename the package. > > There was a discution on naming gtk engines pa

  1   2   3   >