Arjan Oosting wrote:
> This was also my first reaction, but it is a package for non-free. IIRC
> those are not autobuild, are they?
they are autobuilt, but need to be whitelisted by aba.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Int
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Danny van der Meeren wrote:
>> I'm searching for a sponsor for the amd64 binary package of glimpse
> You know that Debian has autobuilders? You (resp. your sponsor) need to
> upload source + binaries for one architecture, the rest is done
> automatically
Op ma, 16-10-2006 te 23:49 +0200, schreef Daniel Baumann:
> Danny van der Meeren wrote:
> > I'm searching for a sponsor for the amd64 binary package of glimpse
>
> You know that Debian has autobuilders? You (resp. your sponsor) need to
> upload source + binaries for one architecture, the rest is d
Danny van der Meeren wrote:
> I'm searching for a sponsor for the amd64 binary package of glimpse
You know that Debian has autobuilders? You (resp. your sponsor) need to
upload source + binaries for one architecture, the rest is done
automatically.
The only possibility would be, if you have speci
On Sunday 22 May 2005 9:38 pm, John Hendrickson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I authored xdm-options
Is that the package you want sponsored and added to Debian?
Have you read the New Maintainers' Guide?
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/index.en.html
and the list FAQ:
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/de
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:01:52PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:56:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Are these message genuine, or some kind of spam?
>
> People google for "sponsor" and get the list e-mail address. It's a kind of
> spam, since they've not done
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:56:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are these message genuine, or some kind of spam?
People google for "sponsor" and get the list e-mail address. It's a kind of
spam, since they've not done even 10 seconds of research to find out whether
we might be interested, b
Are these message genuine, or some kind of spam?
--
Alexandre Fayolle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 17:15, Cai Qian wrote:
> ""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> and the sources. url?""
>
> I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a
> place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you w
> what sizes have the packages got? i am a modem user.
Its orig is 6.9M and Deb pack is 4.3M. I am sorry for these big size.
Regards,
Cai Qian
--
Mail inviata tramite i servizi gratuiti di X-Privat.org -
http://www.x-privat.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
Hello Adeodato,
* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-29 16:36]:
> * Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]:
> > nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> > and the sources. url?
>
> From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html:
>
* Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]:
> nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> and the sources. url?
From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html:
"I have no place for these packages, so please reply me and I'll
sent th
""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
and the sources. url?""
I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a
place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you want.
Sorry for inconvient.
Regards,
Cai Qian
--
Mail invi
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 17:15, Cai Qian wrote:
> ""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> and the sources. url?""
>
> I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a
> place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you w
Hallo Cai,
* Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-28 20:51]:
> I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
> few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
> bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
> help.
>
> Anyway
> what sizes have the packages got? i am a modem user.
Its orig is 6.9M and Deb pack is 4.3M. I am sorry for these big size.
Regards,
Cai Qian
--
Mail inviata tramite i servizi gratuiti di X-Privat.org - http://www.x-privat.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
Hello Adeodato,
* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-29 16:36]:
> * Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]:
> > nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> > and the sources. url?
>
> From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html:
>
* Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]:
> nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> and the sources. url?
From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html:
"I have no place for these packages, so please reply me and I'll
sent th
""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
and the sources. url?""
I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a
place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you want.
Sorry for inconvient.
Regards,
Cai Qian
--
Mail invi
Hallo Cai,
* Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-28 20:51]:
> I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
> few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
> bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
> help.
>
> Anyway
> Please don't take that personally, but I guess the situation is similar
> for the people here who are ready to sponsor.
I see, but I wish there will be more people to help, because the DD
application goes on slowly. Anyway, thanks.
> > ftp-ssl
> > ftpd-ssl -- bugs fixed, new maintainer
> You
> Please don't take that personally, but I guess the situation is similar
> for the people here who are ready to sponsor.
I see, but I wish there will be more people to help, because the DD
application goes on slowly. Anyway, thanks.
> > ftp-ssl
> > ftpd-ssl -- bugs fixed, new maintainer
> You
Hi,
* Cai Qian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 20:40]:
> I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
> few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
> bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
> help.
sorry for not giving y
Hi,
* Cai Qian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 20:40]:
> I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
> few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
> bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
> help.
sorry for not giving y
Hi Mentors,
I have added minimum support for both
PHP and Perl into ruli-0.19. The new
Debian packages are uploaded to
mentors.debian.net and are also
available in the usual place:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
I have a signature of [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
my gpg key. I suppose that is
Hi Mentors,
I have added minimum support for both
PHP and Perl into ruli-0.19. The new
Debian packages are uploaded to
mentors.debian.net and are also
available in the usual place:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
I have a signature of [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
my gpg key. I suppose that is
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On 2004-03-19 10:09:53 + Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
>
> Subject does not say it all. To save others time, I tell the list this
> is cups-pdf, a PDF writer backend fo
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
The effort involved in going to the bug report and have a good read isn't
likely to be expended if I don't have any interest in the package.
You might get a bet
On 2004-03-19 10:09:53 + Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
Subject does not say it all. To save others time, I tell the list this is
cups-pdf, a PDF writer backend for CUPS.
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On 2004-03-19 10:09:53 + Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
>
> Subject does not say it all. To save others time, I tell the list this
> is cups-pdf, a PDF writer backend fo
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
The effort involved in going to the bug report and have a good read isn't
likely to be expended if I don't have any interest in the package.
You might get a bet
On 2004-03-19 10:09:53 + Martin-Ãric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
Subject does not say it all. To save others time, I tell the list this is cups-pdf, a
PDF writer backend for CUPS.
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Text such as the following would be useful in your
> licencing statements:
>
> "Additional to those permissions granted by the GNU
> Public License,
> permission is given to distribute copies of this
> work linked to software
> licenced under the ter
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Text such as the following would be useful in your
> licencing statements:
>
> "Additional to those permissions granted by the GNU
> Public License,
> permission is given to distribute copies of this
> work linked to software
> licenced under the ter
On 2004-03-18 Everton da Silva Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd start hitting up the maintainers (and upstreams) of packages
>> which *could* use SRV records, regardless of whether they
>> currently do or not, and suggest it to them.
> I pla
On 2004-03-18 Everton da Silva Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd start hitting up the maintainers (and upstreams) of packages
>> which *could* use SRV records, regardless of whether they
>> currently do or not, and suggest it to them.
> I pla
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:50:24AM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> I'm unsure on how to apply licensing terms to RULI
> (GNU GPL)
> plus this recently created PHP4-binding. Do we have
> compatibility issues with the PHP license?
Since your library is under the GPL, I presume that the PHP4
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd start hitting up the maintainers (and upstreams)
of
> packages which *could* use SRV records, regardless
of
> whether they currently do or not, and suggest it to
them.
I plan to push that kind of SRV adoption. I have
actually
sent a ruli-based
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:50:24AM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> I'm unsure on how to apply licensing terms to RULI
> (GNU GPL)
> plus this recently created PHP4-binding. Do we have
> compatibility issues with the PHP license?
Since your library is under the GPL, I presume that the PHP4
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd start hitting up the maintainers (and upstreams)
of
> packages which *could* use SRV records, regardless
of
> whether they currently do or not, and suggest it to
them.
I plan to push that kind of SRV adoption. I have
actually
sent a ruli-based
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:42:33PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:44:43PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> > I do intend to push the library, but I actually don't
> > have a map of Debian applications which use SRV
> > records. I'm planning to contact those applic
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:42:33PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:44:43PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> > I do intend to push the library, but I actually don't
> > have a map of Debian applications which use SRV
> > records. I'm planning to contact those applic
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:44:43PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> I do intend to push the library, but I actually don't
> have a map of Debian applications which use SRV
> records. I'm planning to contact those applications
> (i.e. their maintainers) as soon as I find them,
> but I would
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:44:43PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> I do intend to push the library, but I actually don't
> have a map of Debian applications which use SRV
> records. I'm planning to contact those applications
> (i.e. their maintainers) as soon as I find them,
> but I would
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Excellent. Looks like an interesting package. Are
> you pushing various
> upstreams to use this library? Does it have PHP,
> Perl, Python, etc
> bindings? (That may be implied by your use of
> liboop, but I'm not familiar
> with that package at
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:25:05PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> The usual description for the RULI package is:
>
> RULI stands for Resolver User Layer Interface. It's
> a library built on top of an asynchronous DNS stub
> resolver. RULI provides an easy-to-use interface
> for q
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Excellent. Looks like an interesting package. Are
> you pushing various
> upstreams to use this library? Does it have PHP,
> Perl, Python, etc
> bindings? (That may be implied by your use of
> liboop, but I'm not familiar
> with that package at
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Before someone takes the time to look at the BTS and
> savannah, they need to
> be interested in your package. Telling people what
> the package is helps in
> that.
Thanks for the hint. I'm sorry for my poor first try.
Please let me start over.
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:25:05PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> The usual description for the RULI package is:
>
> RULI stands for Resolver User Layer Interface. It's
> a library built on top of an asynchronous DNS stub
> resolver. RULI provides an easy-to-use interface
> for q
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Before someone takes the time to look at the BTS and
> savannah, they need to
> be interested in your package. Telling people what
> the package is helps in
> that.
Thanks for the hint. I'm sorry for my poor first try.
Please let me start over.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:38:53PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> This is my first Debian package.
>
> The bug report for the package is here:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=234303
>
> The tentative package files are here:
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:38:53PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> This is my first Debian package.
>
> The bug report for the package is here:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=234303
>
> The tentative package files are here:
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > submitter 157749 !
> > NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
> > owner !
> >
> > This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
> > (ie. the pkg is uploaded).
>
> Oops. I stand
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > submitter 157749 !
> NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
> owner !
>
> This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
> (ie. the pkg is uploaded).
Oops. I stand corrected. I don't think owner existe
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
>
> Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
> operating procedure for RFPs.
>
> $ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 157749
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > submitter 157749 !
> > NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
> > owner !
> >
> > This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
> > (ie. the pkg is uploaded).
>
> Oops. I stand
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > submitter 157749 !
> NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
> owner !
>
> This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
> (ie. the pkg is uploaded).
Oops. I stand corrected. I don't think owner existe
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
>
> Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
> operating procedure for RFPs.
>
> $ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 157749
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 21:25, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
>
> Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
> operating procedure for RFPs.
Done.I think I did
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
operating procedure for RFPs.
$ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 157749 ITP: ...
submitter 157749 !
thanks
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 21:25, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
>
> Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
> operating procedure for RFPs.
Done.I think I did
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
operating procedure for RFPs.
$ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 157749 ITP: ...
submitter 157749 !
thanks
On Sunday 21 December 2003 04:15, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> What is it about konversation which makes it so much better than every
> other IRC client out there?
Well, I know there are more than a few IRC clients out there. =) And while
it may be a stretch to claim it is "so much better than every
On Sunday 21 December 2003 04:15, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> What is it about konversation which makes it so much better than every
> other IRC client out there?
Well, I know there are more than a few IRC clients out there. =) And while
it may be a stretch to claim it is "so much better than every
Nathaniel W. Turner said:
> Wow, Konversation sure is a great IRC client! It would sure be great
> if it were in Debian What? You think so too? You're a DD?
> Splendid! Consider sponsoring my package:
[...]
> P.S. I was going to put "Single IRC client package seeks caring DD for
> uplo
Nathaniel W. Turner said:
> Wow, Konversation sure is a great IRC client! It would sure be great
> if it were in Debian What? You think so too? You're a DD?
> Splendid! Consider sponsoring my package:
[...]
> P.S. I was going to put "Single IRC client package seeks caring DD for
> uplo
David Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> First of all, I appreciate the criticism. I've been pondering my eol
> package throughout the week and I've decided it still has merit. It
> is not intended to recode between unicode, ebdic, and ascii, like
> recode. It's merely intende
David Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> First of all, I appreciate the criticism. I've been pondering my eol
> package throughout the week and I've decided it still has merit. It
> is not intended to recode between unicode, ebdic, and ascii, like
> recode. It's merely intend
At 13:12 -0700 07 Oct 2001, David Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This will clash with an existing package:
> >
> >$ dpkg -L sysutils | grep todos
> >/usr/bin/todos
> >/usr/share/man/man1/todos.1.gz
>
> Thanks, I've added a conflict line to my package:
There's a clash for tomac as well:
8
At 13:12 -0700 07 Oct 2001, David Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This will clash with an existing package:
> >
> >$ dpkg -L sysutils | grep todos
> >/usr/bin/todos
> >/usr/share/man/man1/todos.1.gz
>
> Thanks, I've added a conflict line to my package:
There's a clash for tomac as well:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 01:12:08PM -0700, David Caldwell wrote:
> --On Monday, October 1, 2001 9:10 AM -0400 Peter S Galbraith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This will clash with an existing package:
> >
> > $ dpkg -L sysutils | grep todos
> > /usr/bin/todos
> > /usr/share/man/man1/todos.1.gz
>
On Sunday, September 30, 2001 4:48 PM +0200 Erich Schubert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Description: Translates text files between Mac, DOS, and Unix formats
'eol' contains 4 programs that help you deal with cross-platform text
files:
[snip]
Do you know "recode"?
recode knows over 200 differ
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 01:12:08PM -0700, David Caldwell wrote:
> --On Monday, October 1, 2001 9:10 AM -0400 Peter S Galbraith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This will clash with an existing package:
> >
> > $ dpkg -L sysutils | grep todos
> > /usr/bin/todos
> > /usr/share/man/man1/todos.1.gz
>
On Sunday, September 30, 2001 4:48 PM +0200 Erich Schubert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Description: Translates text files between Mac, DOS, and Unix formats
>> 'eol' contains 4 programs that help you deal with cross-platform text
>> files:
[snip]
> Do you know "recode"?
> recode knows over
Em Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:43:13 +0200
Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > Out of curiosity, what advantages does it have over gmc's archive support?
> > (I assume Nautilus has something similar as well)
> To be honest, nothing but a more convenient interface. I always feel
> constricted in f
Em Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:43:13 +0200
Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > Out of curiosity, what advantages does it have over gmc's archive support?
> > (I assume Nautilus has something similar as well)
> To be honest, nothing but a more convenient interface. I always feel
> constricted in
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:05:05PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:05:05 +0200
> Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> I would be glad to sponsor you, but I would like to see a complete source
I apologise for the whole mess. KMail resend my whole mutt outbox
yeste
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:51:35PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:05:05PM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
>
> > The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> > interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> > written in
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:05:05PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:05:05 +0200
> Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> I would be glad to sponsor you, but I would like to see a complete source
I apologise for the whole mess. KMail resend my whole mutt outbox
yest
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:51:35PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:05:05PM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
>
> > The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> > interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> > written i
Em Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:05:05 +0200
Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> I need a sponsor.
Hi,
> The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> written in Python with one widget written
Em Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:05:05 +0200
Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> I need a sponsor.
Hi,
> The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> written in Python with one widget writte
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:05:05PM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
> The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> written in Python with one widget written in C.
Out of curiosity, what advantages d
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:05:05PM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
> The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> written in Python with one widget written in C.
Out of curiosity, what advantages
84 matches
Mail list logo
