Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 03:39:46PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > The subject line does not get sent, so your message won't get though. Using dadadodo? :) The subject line is the only thing that gets sent to the submitter, apart from the automatic notification junk. -- Digital Electronic Being I

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 03:39:46PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > The subject line does not get sent, so your message won't get though. Using dadadodo? :) The subject line is the only thing that gets sent to the submitter, apart from the automatic notification junk. -- Digital Electronic Being

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:10:49AM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) wrote: > > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text. > ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"... > I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in > some doc, that one should avoid usi

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:10:49AM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) wrote: > > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text. > ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"... > I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in > some doc, that one should avoid us

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:16:36PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 03:10]: > > > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text. > > ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"... > > I thought it was not the right s

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:16:36PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 03:10]: > > > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text. > > ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"... > > I thought it was not the right

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 03:10]: > > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text. > ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"... > I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in > some doc, that one should avoid using the em

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-27 Thread Falk Hueffner
"Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in some > doc, that one should avoid using the email way of closing > bugs... thanks =) That's not reasonable rule. The rule is to close bugs in changelogs if they were fixed by ex

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-27 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 03:10]: > > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text. > ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"... > I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in > some doc, that one should avoid using the e

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-27 Thread Falk Hueffner
"Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in some > doc, that one should avoid using the email way of closing > bugs... thanks =) That's not reasonable rule. The rule is to close bugs in changelogs if they were fixed by e

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-26 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva \(KoV\)
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:06:21PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:32:47AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]: > > > I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing > > > its ITP in changelog,

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:32:47AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]: > > I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing > > its ITP in changelog, what should I do? I think uploading a > > new revision is the right thin

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-26 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV)
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:06:21PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:32:47AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]: > > > I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing > > > its ITP in changelog,

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:32:47AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]: > > I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing > > its ITP in changelog, what should I do? I think uploading a > > new revision is the right thi

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]: > I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing > its ITP in changelog, what should I do? I think uploading a > new revision is the right thing, right? No, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body: close 81745

Re: ITP bug closing

2001-01-26 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]: > I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing > its ITP in changelog, what should I do? I think uploading a > new revision is the right thing, right? No, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body: close 8174