On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 03:39:46PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> The subject line does not get sent, so your message won't get though.
Using dadadodo? :) The subject line is the only thing that gets sent to the
submitter, apart from the automatic notification junk.
--
Digital Electronic Being I
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 03:39:46PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> The subject line does not get sent, so your message won't get though.
Using dadadodo? :) The subject line is the only thing that gets sent to the
submitter, apart from the automatic notification junk.
--
Digital Electronic Being
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:10:49AM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) wrote:
> > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text.
> ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"...
> I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in
> some doc, that one should avoid usi
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:10:49AM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) wrote:
> > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text.
> ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"...
> I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in
> some doc, that one should avoid us
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:16:36PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 03:10]:
> > > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text.
> > ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"...
> > I thought it was not the right s
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:16:36PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 03:10]:
> > > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text.
> > ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"...
> > I thought it was not the right
* Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 03:10]:
> > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text.
> ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"...
> I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in
> some doc, that one should avoid using the em
"Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in some
> doc, that one should avoid using the email way of closing
> bugs... thanks =)
That's not reasonable rule. The rule is to close bugs in changelogs if
they were fixed by ex
* Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 03:10]:
> > Or [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation in the text.
> ok, I did what Martin said, with subjet "already uploaded"...
> I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in
> some doc, that one should avoid using the e
"Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought it was not the right solution, cause I read it in some
> doc, that one should avoid using the email way of closing
> bugs... thanks =)
That's not reasonable rule. The rule is to close bugs in changelogs if
they were fixed by e
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:06:21PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:32:47AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]:
> > > I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing
> > > its ITP in changelog,
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:32:47AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]:
> > I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing
> > its ITP in changelog, what should I do? I think uploading a
> > new revision is the right thin
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:06:21PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:32:47AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]:
> > > I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing
> > > its ITP in changelog,
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 02:32:47AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]:
> > I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing
> > its ITP in changelog, what should I do? I think uploading a
> > new revision is the right thi
* Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]:
> I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing
> its ITP in changelog, what should I do? I think uploading a
> new revision is the right thing, right?
No, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body:
close 81745
* Gustavo Noronha Silva (KoV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010127 00:07]:
> I made a mistake on uploading my new package without closing
> its ITP in changelog, what should I do? I think uploading a
> new revision is the right thing, right?
No, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body:
close 8174
16 matches
Mail list logo