Re: Help with RC bugs

2003-03-19 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 05:59:09PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > > SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a > > *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2 > > support is g

Re: Help with RC bugs

2003-03-19 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 05:59:09PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > > SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a > > *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2 > > support is g

Re: Help with RC bugs

2003-03-15 Thread Graham Wilson
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a > *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2 > support is gone for the panel and applets in unstable, should I just > stop uploadin

Re: Help with RC bugs

2003-03-15 Thread Graham Wilson
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: > SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a > *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2 > support is gone for the panel and applets in unstable, should I just > stop uploadin