Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-03 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 05:14:58PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > > Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to this > > > standard form (whatever that then is). > > > > I couldn't find a good one, so I wrote my o

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to this > > standard form (whatever that then is). > > I couldn't find a good one, so I wrote my own. Wouldn't a reference to a good book on discrete math/logic be su

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-03 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:45:33AM +0100, Jrme Marant wrote: > Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How about an explanatory paragraph in the packaging manual, and a > > wishlist bug report against dpkg to allow more complex > > These 2 things would be great. > > Do you want me to fi

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-03 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 05:14:58PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > > Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to this > > > standard form (whatever that then is). > > > > I couldn't find a good one, so I wrote my

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-03 Thread Joey Hess
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to this > > standard form (whatever that then is). > > I couldn't find a good one, so I wrote my own. Wouldn't a reference to a good book on discrete math/logic be s

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-03 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:45:33AM +0100, Jrme Marant wrote: > Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How about an explanatory paragraph in the packaging manual, and a > > wishlist bug report against dpkg to allow more complex > > These 2 things would be great. > > Do you want me to f

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-03 Thread Jérôme Marant
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about an explanatory paragraph in the packaging manual, and a > wishlist bug report against dpkg to allow more complex These 2 things would be great. Do you want me to fill a bug report or do you want to do it yourself? I guess that dpkg is cur

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-03 Thread Jérôme Marant
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about an explanatory paragraph in the packaging manual, and a > wishlist bug report against dpkg to allow more complex These 2 things would be great. Do you want me to fill a bug report or do you want to do it yourself? I guess that dpkg is cu

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow > wrote: >> Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to >> this standard form (whatever that then is). > I couldn't find a good one, so I wrote

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow > wrote: >> Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to >> this standard form (whatever that then is). > I couldn't find a good one, so I wrot

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to this > standard form (whatever that then is). I couldn't find a good one, so I wrote my own. I'll move it to my Debian webspace later today. If anyone wants to look a

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to this standard form (whatever that then is). MfG Goswin

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to this > standard form (whatever that then is). I couldn't find a good one, so I wrote my own. I'll move it to my Debian webspace later today. If anyone wants to look

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to this standard form (whatever that then is). MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 05:37:14PM +0100, Jrme Marant wrote: > Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thank you very much. > > > Hmm, this has been asked before. There is a solution. > > I would love to see a FAQ referencing all problems with their solution > that were mentioned o

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Jérôme Marant
Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thank you very much. > Hmm, this has been asked before. There is a solution. I would love to see a FAQ referencing all problems with their solution that were mentioned on -devel and -mentors. This would avoid us to ask the same questions over a

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == J?r?me Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, (and happy new year :-)) > I'm packaging a program that has some kind of dependencies: > Package: A Depends: B | C, D | E > I'd like to make sure that: - once B installed, D was also > installed - or once C in

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 05:37:14PM +0100, Jrme Marant wrote: > Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thank you very much. > > > Hmm, this has been asked before. There is a solution. > > I would love to see a FAQ referencing all problems with their solution > that were mentioned

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Jérôme Marant
Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thank you very much. > Hmm, this has been asked before. There is a solution. I would love to see a FAQ referencing all problems with their solution that were mentioned on -devel and -mentors. This would avoid us to ask the same questions over

Re: Grouping dependencies

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, (and happy new year :-)) > I'm packaging a program that has some kind of dependencies: > Package: A Depends: B | C, D | E > I'd like to make sure that: - once B installed, D was also > installed - or once C i