On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:44:10AM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> a short question: Against which rules I violate, when no debug package
> is available?
Debug packages are purely optional, so nothing.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
A Dimarts, 20 de maig de 2014, Rebecca N. Palmer va escriure:
> The purpose of a -dbg package is to provide a mapping between binary
> addresses and source line numbers/variable names, not to provide the
> source itself: it's working if your debug backtraces are of the form
>
> #3 0x00e
* Andrey Rahmatullin , 2014-05-20, 15:46:
However, when I debug a program that uses ompl, and I want to trace a
function, I cannot see the sources (this is normal?). The debug file
is quiet big, and I think that it should contains the code to trace.
Debug info doesn't contain the code itself, yo
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:41:40AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> However, when I debug a program that uses ompl, and I want to trace a
> function, I cannot see the sources (this is normal?). The debug file is quiet
> big, and I think that it should contains the code to trace.
Debug in
The purpose of a -dbg package is to provide a mapping between binary
addresses and source line numbers/variable names, not to provide the
source itself: it's working if your debug backtraces are of the form
#3 0x00ed4188 in SGPropertyNode::set_string (this=0x7eaa480,
val=0x20d79a0
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:14:28PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
>
> "Kevin B. McCarty" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Also (and this is quite a dumb question), when the end user wants to use
> >the debug package, what magical options does s/he give to gdb when
> >running a program so that g
"Kevin B. McCarty" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also (and this is quite a dumb question), when the end user wants to use
the debug package, what magical options does s/he give to gdb when
running a program so that gdb knows where to find the debugging
information? Is additional setup
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Paul Wise [Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:18:07 +0800]:
>> I'd like to add a package for debug information, since the app crashes
>> occasionally. Should I add a libfoo0-dbg or foo-dbg package containing
>> debug info for the lib and the app? or should I create separate
>> libfoo0-db
* Paul Wise [Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:18:07 +0800]:
> Hi all,
> I'm packaging a C++ app that has packages like this:
> foo - binary using the library
> libfoo0 - the library itself
> libfoo0-dev - headers and so on
> libfoo0-doc - docs for the library
> I'd like to add a package for debu
also sprach Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.30.1518 +0100]:
> Secondly, is dh_strip -k the right way to do this?
Yes. It mostly automates the process too.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud D
10 matches
Mail list logo
