Tony Houghton writes:
> I'm a bit confused about the Vcs fields in Control files. Many projects
> have the upstream code and debian packaging maintained separately and
> I'm not entirely sure what you're supposed to do with the Vcs fields in
> that case. Should they point to upstream or the packa
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 03:10:06PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> I'm a bit confused about the Vcs fields in Control files. Many projects
> have the upstream code and debian packaging maintained separately and
> I'm not entirely sure what you're supposed to do with the Vcs fields in
> that case. Sho
Zeno Davatz (2002-10-04 11:13:59 +0200) :
> On 2.10.2002 19:28 Uhr, "Simon Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The "i" in front of the comma.
>>
>> Simon
> Thanks. Do you have an idea why my Debian still wants to install
> apache-common when I make apt-get install php4?
Maybe because php
Zeno Davatz (2002-10-04 11:13:59 +0200) :
> On 2.10.2002 19:28 Uhr, "Simon Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The "i" in front of the comma.
>>
>> Simon
> Thanks. Do you have an idea why my Debian still wants to install
> apache-common when I make apt-get install php4?
Maybe because ph
On 2.10.2002 19:28 Uhr, "Simon Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "i" in front of the comma.
>
> Simon
Thanks. Do you have an idea why my Debian still wants to install
apache-common when I make apt-get install php4?
My control file is now (sorry the last one was the old one):
Source: ap
On 2.10.2002 19:28 Uhr, "Simon Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "i" in front of the comma.
>
> Simon
Thanks. Do you have an idea why my Debian still wants to install
apache-common when I make apt-get install php4?
My control file is now (sorry the last one was the old one):
Source: a
On 2.10.2002 19:28 Uhr, "Simon Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "i" in front of the comma.
>
> Simon
Thanks. Do you have an idea why my Debian still wants to install
apache-common when I make apt-get install php4?
My control file is now:
Source: apache-ssl-ywesee
Section: web
Priority
On 2.10.2002 19:28 Uhr, "Simon Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "i" in front of the comma.
>
> Simon
Thanks. Do you have an idea why my Debian still wants to install
apache-common when I make apt-get install php4?
My control file is now:
Source: apache-ssl-ywesee
Section: web
Priorit
Zeno,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:05:32PM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> > Watch out for syntax errors happening by using vi. :-)
> Sorry I am a newbie. Where are they?
The "i" in front of the comma.
Simon
--
GPG Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4
pgpsGxM16bNno.pg
Zeno,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:56:33PM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> Source: apache-ssl-ywesee
> Section: web
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: ywesee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0)i, libncurses5 (>= 5.2.20020112a-7 ),
> libssl0.9.6 (>= 0.9.6c-2.woody.1 ), openssl (>= 0
Hi,
Sven LUTHER:
> Mmm, is Provides a superset of Replaces, or do you have to specify both
They simply have different semantics. It's better not to conflate them.
--
Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/
On Thursday 03 October 2002 11:05, Zeno Davatz wrote:
>
> If I do apt-get install php4
>
> My Debian still asks me to install apache-common - Why?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Zeno
Because php4 depends on a version of apache-common and Provides does not help
with version depends.
As I commented
On Thursday 03 October 2002 11:08, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> Mmm, is Provides a superset of Replaces, or do you have to specify both
> ?
>
Replaces says "it is ok to install me when this other package is installed,
even if we have the same files, I now own those files". Provides says "for
all inte
On 2.10.2002 17:26 Uhr, "Simon Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Watch out for syntax errors happening by using vi. :-)
Sorry I am a newbie. Where are they?
> You do want to "Provides: apache, apache-common, apache-ssl" and
> "Conflicts: apache". The "Replaces" is not needed.
Did not work: my
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:29:46PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 16:56, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> [...]
> > Why do the dependency-manager not know that I already got apache-ssl
> > installed. I wrote in my control file that apache-ssl-ywesee replaces
> > apache, apache-common, apache
On Thursday 03 October 2002 08:56, Zeno Davatz wrote:
>
> My Debian tells me that I need to install apache-common.
>
> Why do the dependency-manager not know that I already got apache-ssl
> installed. I wrote in my control file that apache-ssl-ywesee replaces
> apache, apache-common, apache-ssl
>
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 16:56, Zeno Davatz wrote:
[...]
> Why do the dependency-manager not know that I already got apache-ssl
> installed. I wrote in my control file that apache-ssl-ywesee replaces
> apache, apache-common, apache-ssl
All Replaces: does is ensure that if you install apache-ssl-ywese
Zeno,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:05:32PM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> > Watch out for syntax errors happening by using vi. :-)
> Sorry I am a newbie. Where are they?
The "i" in front of the comma.
Simon
--
GPG Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4
msg07391/pgp00
Zeno,
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:56:33PM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> Source: apache-ssl-ywesee
> Section: web
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: ywesee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0)i, libncurses5 (>= 5.2.20020112a-7 ),
> libssl0.9.6 (>= 0.9.6c-2.woody.1 ), openssl (>=
Hi,
Sven LUTHER:
> Mmm, is Provides a superset of Replaces, or do you have to specify both
They simply have different semantics. It's better not to conflate them.
--
Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Thursday 03 October 2002 11:05, Zeno Davatz wrote:
>
> If I do apt-get install php4
>
> My Debian still asks me to install apache-common - Why?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Zeno
Because php4 depends on a version of apache-common and Provides does not help
with version depends.
As I commente
On Thursday 03 October 2002 11:08, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> Mmm, is Provides a superset of Replaces, or do you have to specify both
> ?
>
Replaces says "it is ok to install me when this other package is installed,
even if we have the same files, I now own those files". Provides says "for
all int
On 2.10.2002 17:26 Uhr, "Simon Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Watch out for syntax errors happening by using vi. :-)
Sorry I am a newbie. Where are they?
> You do want to "Provides: apache, apache-common, apache-ssl" and
> "Conflicts: apache". The "Replaces" is not needed.
Did not work: m
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:29:46PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 16:56, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> [...]
> > Why do the dependency-manager not know that I already got apache-ssl
> > installed. I wrote in my control file that apache-ssl-ywesee replaces
> > apache, apache-common, apach
On Thursday 03 October 2002 08:56, Zeno Davatz wrote:
>
> My Debian tells me that I need to install apache-common.
>
> Why do the dependency-manager not know that I already got apache-ssl
> installed. I wrote in my control file that apache-ssl-ywesee replaces
> apache, apache-common, apache-ssl
>
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 16:56, Zeno Davatz wrote:
[...]
> Why do the dependency-manager not know that I already got apache-ssl
> installed. I wrote in my control file that apache-ssl-ywesee replaces
> apache, apache-common, apache-ssl
All Replaces: does is ensure that if you install apache-ssl-ywes
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:39:58PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi Julian!
>
> > > The problem I have is that I have a library with same host architecture
> > > but
> > > different cross compilation targets, so I have things like:
> >
> > Build-Depends supports an arch specification, like:
>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:39:58PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi Julian!
>
> > > The problem I have is that I have a library with same host architecture but
> > > different cross compilation targets, so I have things like:
> >
> > Build-Depends supports an arch specification, like:
> >
>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:39:58PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi Julian!
>
> > > The problem I have is that I have a library with same host architecture
> > > but
> > > different cross compilation targets, so I have things like:
> >
> > Build-Depends supports an arch specification, like:
>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 01:39:58PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi Julian!
>
> > > The problem I have is that I have a library with same host architecture but
> > > different cross compilation targets, so I have things like:
> >
> > Build-Depends supports an arch specification, like:
> >
>
Hi Julian!
> > The problem I have is that I have a library with same host architecture but
> > different cross compilation targets, so I have things like:
>
> Build-Depends supports an arch specification, like:
>
> Build-Depends: libc-arm-version (>=2.1) [arm]
>
> See policy section 7.1 for det
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:50:52AM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can I put a different Build-Depends for each binary package in a control
> file or can there only be a Build-Depends for the source package?
You can only have one Build-Depends in the control file for the source
package.
Hi Julian!
> > The problem I have is that I have a library with same host architecture but
> > different cross compilation targets, so I have things like:
>
> Build-Depends supports an arch specification, like:
>
> Build-Depends: libc-arm-version (>=2.1) [arm]
>
> See policy section 7.1 for de
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:50:52AM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can I put a different Build-Depends for each binary package in a control
> file or can there only be a Build-Depends for the source package?
You can only have one Build-Depends in the control file for the source
package.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:32:54PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Is it ok to configure a package differently on one arch?
> I want to build solfege with --disable-oss-sound on m68k until
> the binutils/glibc problems are fixed.
>
> If I use --disable-oss-sound (only on m68k), the package conta
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:32:54PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Is it ok to configure a package differently on one arch?
> I want to build solfege with --disable-oss-sound on m68k until
> the binutils/glibc problems are fixed.
>
> If I use --disable-oss-sound (only on m68k), the package conta
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:32:54PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Is it ok to configure a package differently on one arch?
> I want to build solfege with --disable-oss-sound on m68k until
> the binutils/glibc problems are fixed.
>
> If I use --disable-oss-sound (only on m68k), the package cont
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:32:54PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Is it ok to configure a package differently on one arch?
> I want to build solfege with --disable-oss-sound on m68k until
> the binutils/glibc problems are fixed.
>
> If I use --disable-oss-sound (only on m68k), the package cont
On Tuesday 26 December 2000 17:40, John Leuner wrote:
> Why does this control file:
>
> Source: antlr
> Section: devel
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Build-Depends: debhelper, fastjar
> Standards-Version: 3.0.1
> Package: antlr
> Architecture: all
> Depends: ja
On Tuesday 26 December 2000 17:40, John Leuner wrote:
> Why does this control file:
>
> Source: antlr
> Section: devel
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Build-Depends: debhelper, fastjar
> Standards-Version: 3.0.1
> Package: antlr
> Architecture: all
> Depends: j
40 matches
Mail list logo
