Re: Bug#762228: RFS: ufoai-music review

2014-09-21 Thread Tobias Frost
On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 03:50 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:10:00AM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote: > > Hi Markus, > > > > On 2014-09-20 01:22, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > The debian/copyright file is identical for ufoai-data, ufoai-music and > > > ufoai-maps. > > > > I

Re: Bug#762228: RFS: ufoai-music review

2014-09-20 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:10:00AM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote: > Hi Markus, > > On 2014-09-20 01:22, Markus Koschany wrote: > > The debian/copyright file is identical for ufoai-data, ufoai-music and > > ufoai-maps. > > I find this somewhat confusing. > > Generally speaking, I don't believe t

Re: Bug#762228: RFS: ufoai-music review

2014-09-20 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2014-09-20 16:22, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 20.09.2014 16:02, Tobias Frost wrote: >> Addendum: >> >> On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 15:45 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: Absolutely agreed. But can you point me to examples where the short reference to /usr/share/common-licenses was deemed not appro

Re: Bug#762228: RFS: ufoai-music review

2014-09-20 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2014-09-20 17:33, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 20.09.2014 15:45, Tobias Frost wrote: >> Due to the split I say "we now have 4 related, but independent source >> packages and they should be handled as such". >> The Relation is no guarantee that the packages will not diverge in the >> future. (e.

Re: Bug#762228: RFS: ufoai-music review

2014-09-20 Thread Markus Koschany
On 20.09.2014 16:00, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2014-09-20 13:02, Markus Koschany wrote: >> On 20.09.2014 09:57, Tobias Frost wrote: >>> My reasoning is, that because of every data package has its own >>> orig.tar, they need to be crafted in a way to so that they will >>> be -- individually look

Re: Bug#762228: RFS: ufoai-music review

2014-09-20 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2014-09-20 13:02, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 20.09.2014 09:57, Tobias Frost wrote: >> My reasoning is, that because of every data package has its own >> orig.tar, they need to be crafted in a way to so that they will >> be -- individually looked at -- reach Debian quality requirements. To exp

Re: Bug#762228: RFS: ufoai-music review

2014-09-20 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2014-09-20 13:23, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 20.09.2014 10:10, Christian Kastner wrote: >> On 2014-09-20 01:22, Markus Koschany wrote: >>> The debian/copyright file is identical for ufoai-data, ufoai-music and >>> ufoai-maps. >> >> I find this somewhat confusing. >> >> Generally speaking, I don

Re: Bug#762228: RFS: ufoai-music review

2014-09-20 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, On 20.09.2014 10:10, Christian Kastner wrote: > Hi Markus, > > On 2014-09-20 01:22, Markus Koschany wrote: >> The debian/copyright file is identical for ufoai-data, ufoai-music and >> ufoai-maps. > > I find this somewhat confusing. > > Generally speaking, I don't believe that listing the co

Re: Bug#762228: RFS: ufoai-music review

2014-09-20 Thread Christian Kastner
Hi Markus, On 2014-09-20 01:22, Markus Koschany wrote: > The debian/copyright file is identical for ufoai-data, ufoai-music and > ufoai-maps. I find this somewhat confusing. Generally speaking, I don't believe that listing the copyright of files which are not part of the source package (in fact,