also sprach Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.23.1305 +]:
> Other VCS's however, allow rollbacks to occur much more easily ;).
Which is a design deficiency IMHO. But let's not go there. I believe
that discussion has been beaten to death.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:05:02AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 12:34 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >
> > Uh? Is "rollback" (in the sense of "undoing" a commit) possible with SVN
> > without manually fiddling in the repository at all?
> >
> > If this is *not* the case
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 12:34 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:01:52PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Also, in the (rare but can occur) event of a svn rollback, r91 is not
> > necessarily accurate after the fact,whereas a datestamp is.
>
> Uh? Is "rollback" (in the sen
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:37:14PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:01:52PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > Also, in the (rare but can occur) event of a svn rollback, r91 is not
> > > necessarily accurat
also sprach Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.23.1137 +]:
> > Uh? Is "rollback" (in the sense of "undoing" a commit) possible with SVN
> > without manually fiddling in the repository at all?
>
> Sure, svn merge.
?
svn merge is like applying a patch and will require a commit, which
will
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 12:34:08PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:01:52PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Also, in the (rare but can occur) event of a svn rollback, r91 is not
> > necessarily accurate after the fact,whereas a datestamp is.
>
> Uh? Is "rollback" (in
6 matches
Mail list logo
