Re: (upstream-)contrib, /usr/doc, and Depends

1999-07-19 Thread Peter S Galbraith
James Mastros wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 09:11:36AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > "James M. Mastros" wrote: > > >/usr/doc/naim/examples is wrong because they aren't really > > >examples. > > That's the only place they _can_ go. I agree that we need a new > > directory for suc

Re: (upstream-)contrib, /usr/doc, and Depends

1999-07-19 Thread James Mastros
On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 09:11:36AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > "James M. Mastros" wrote: > >/usr/doc/naim/examples is wrong because they aren't really > >examples. > That's the only place they _can_ go. I agree that we need a new > directory for such things. I'm keeping them where th

Re: (upstream-)contrib, /usr/doc, and Depends

1999-07-19 Thread Peter S Galbraith
"James M. Mastros" wrote: > The package I'm packaging has two contrib programs, which are quite > definitly quick-hack level > 1) Where do they go? > 2) What should the permissions be? > naturaly, putting them in >/usr/doc/naim/examples is wrong because they aren't really