I just closed the bug that was reassigned ot TL.
Please *read* what I wrote:
On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
> But there is a better way:
> * package the fonts yourself, in whatever format you need/have them
> * after this I will remove the packages from TeX Live and
> depend on yo
On Sun, 06 Jul 2014, Paul Wise wrote:
> I've always wondered why TeX Live was packaged in this way, it seems
> like packaging individual CTAN packages would be better?
That was rejected in 2004 when I started packaging the first time TeX Live.
It would suddently mena 4500+ new packages.
SuSE is d
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> But there is a better way:
> * package the fonts yourself, in whatever format you need/have them
> * after this I will remove the packages from TeX Live and
> depend on your font packages
I've always wondered why TeX Live was packaged i
Hi,
On Sat, 05 Jul 2014, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 04-07-14 22:03, Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff wrote:
> > Should I request splitting these fonts into individual packages? If yes,
> > how do I do that?
>
> You can request a split. File it as a wishlist bug against the providing
> package (as you woul
On 04-07-14 22:03, Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff wrote:
> Should I request splitting these fonts into individual packages? If yes,
> how do I do that?
You can request a split. File it as a wishlist bug against the providing
package (as you would with any bug). Also prepare yourself to get
wontfix as
Dear mentors,
I'm currently packaging the software and artwork of elementary Project for
Debian as a Google Summer of Code project. Right now I'm looking into
packaging the elementary GTK theme, which requires two fonts to be
installed - "Open Sans" and "Raleway".
These fonts are already packaged
6 matches
Mail list logo
