Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-07-27 Thread Hai Zaar
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > In , Hai Zaar > wrote: > >I need separate 1777 directory for locks library of libbash, since it > >may create rather complex file structure there, so I do not want to > >put it to just /tmp or /var/tmp/, since it may lead to colli

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In , Hai Zaar wrote: >I need separate 1777 directory for locks library of libbash, since it >may create rather complex file structure there, so I do not want to >put it to just /tmp or /var/tmp/, since it may lead to collisions with >files created manually by users That's a *desire*, not a *need*

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In , Hai Zaar > wrote: >>On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Patrick Matthäi > wrote: >>> Hai Zaar schrieb: On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In , Hai Zaar wrote: >On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Hai Zaar schrieb: >>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi >>> >>> wrote: > Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during > boot process? If yes, is there any service in De

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Hai Zaar schrieb: >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi >> wrote: Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Hai Zaar schrieb: On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create requested files/dirs on boot? (Please do not tell me that I need to write init script

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> >> Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot >> process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create >> requested files/dirs on boot? (Please do not tell me that I need to >> write init script to do

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Hai Zaar schrieb: On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Hmm there are some new lintian warnings in http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10c-1.dsc I: libbash source: debian-watch-file-is-missing Oops... fixed I: libbash source: build-depends-with

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Hmm there are some new lintian warnings in > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10c-1.dsc > > > I: libbash source: debian-watch-file-is-missing Oops... fixed > I: libbash source: build-depends-without-arch-dep

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-11 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hai Zaar schrieb: >>> Could you just put the gpl-3 license header to the Files: * part please. >> What for? - I cite it later under separate License: field. It looks >> like this example f

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-11 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: >> Could you just put the gpl-3 license header to the Files: * part please. > What for? - I cite it later under separate License: field. It looks > like this example from DEP, isn't it?: > Example 2 (recurrent license). > > Files: s

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-11 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hai Zaar schrieb: >> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Matthäi >> wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hai Zaar schrieb: Will you accept it if

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-11 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hai Zaar schrieb: >>> Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5? >>> >> I would welcome this step :) > Al

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/5/11 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. : > In <20090510233757.gb6...@ime.usp.br>, Rogério Brito wrote: >>On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >>> But linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are purely developed for >>> debian, and make no sense being released in another distribution. >>> quote --> >>

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <20090510233757.gb6...@ime.usp.br>, Rogério Brito wrote: >On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> But linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are purely developed for >> debian, and make no sense being released in another distribution. >> quote --> > >Those packages are used by distributions

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 20:37 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: >On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html > > <-- quote > > # When to use a native vs a non-native debian package > (...) > > But linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi there. I just caught this, and I'm talking about the quote without even reading its current version. On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html > <-- quote > # When to use a native vs a non-native debian package (...) > But linda, l

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hai Zaar schrieb: >> Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5? >> > > I would welcome this step :) All done. Reuploaded. Please do not upload yet - just tell me if its OK. I

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: > Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5? > I would welcome this step :) - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@l

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hai Zaar schrieb: >> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi >> wrote: >>> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed. >> All done: >> 1. I've decid

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed. > All done: > 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package > is set to 0.9.1

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Hai Zaar wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> >> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed. > All done: > 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package > is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed. All done: 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I'll do official release (with tarballs, etc.) as soon we'll d

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Hai Zaar wrote: > Can you please advice on how to create "orig" package, when debian dir > is part of the project file-tree? Do I need to checkout sources and > then just delete debian subdir, pack orig tarball, then restore debian > dir and proceed? > I don't know how you are creating the tarb

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: > Can you please advice on how to create "orig" package, when debian dir > is part of the project file-tree? Do I need to checkout sources and > then just delete debian subdir, pack orig tarball, then restore debian > dir and proceed?

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html > <-- quote > #  When to use a native vs a non-native debian package > > You should only use a native Debian package when it is clear that the > package would only ever be of

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: >> * debian/changelog: >> - - It is wrong, that the package has been made native > Well, I'm the author of the project, and I want to debian dir to be > part of the project tree (with all of the consequences I know about > it). Does n

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > Hello, > > * debian/control: > - - Out of date standards-version Fixed > > * debian/changelog: > - - It is wrong, that the package has been made native Well, I'm the author of the project, and I want to debian dir to be part of the proje

Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hai Zaar schrieb: > It builds these binary packages: > libbash- a tool that enables bash dynamic-like shared libraries > libbash-doc - user and developer documentation for libbash > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would

RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
Good day, dear mentors. A week ago I've the RFS about libbash package. Since noone replied, I'm resending the request. -- Forwarded message -- From: Hai Zaar Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM Subject: RFS: libbash To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking