Hi Paul,
I've uploaded a new package which should address your packaging concerns.[1]
I find a symbols file a bit overkill for a library which is not going to
be developed any further in the forseeable future, but I've added one
anyway. - You've pointed out a few things I might discuss with upstre
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
> If you're still willing to sponsor libdnet: upstream is not very active
> (wrt. source changes), but responds quickly.
Review below.
> Upstream location has changed, too.
Argh, there is no indication at the sf.net page that it moved to
Hi Paul,
> I'll add libdumbnet/nmap to the security team's embedded-code-copies
> file in the meantime.
ok - I've added liblua/nmap, but that's only a bug in the buildscripts
and will vanish again soon, I hope.
If you're still willing to sponsor libdnet: upstream is not very active
(wrt. source
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
> Well, nmap has applied a ton of patches on top of its libdnet copy, and I've
> only scrolled through the descriptions a few weeks ago - I'm not sure if I'd
> like to merge all of those into the library if I was upstream-responsible,
> so I
> > recent version uploaded no matter what the upstream status is. nmap even
> > uses its own embedded copy of the library.
>
> Quite. That sounds like a bug in nmap, looks like it hasn't been filed
> yet, please file one. nmap also looks like it could use a new
> maintainer too.
Well, nmap has a
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
> that is a different matter that doesn't void my RFS. libdnet has quite a
> number of reverse dependencies in the archive and is in good shape (our
> bugtracker is effectively empty, and the upstream tracker doesn't contain
> any serious i
Hi Paul,
> > Upstream is dormant since I/2007 judging from the CVS graphs over
> > at SF.[3]
>
> In that case, please take over the upstream project:
that is a different matter that doesn't void my RFS. libdnet has quite a
number of reverse dependencies in the archive and is in good shape (our
b
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Jan Christoph Nordholz
wrote:
> Upstream is dormant since I/2007 judging from the CVS graphs over
> at SF.[3]
In that case, please take over the upstream project:
Contact the admins of the project to get them to add you as an admin.
If there is no response, reg
Hi,
(resending my request from Apr 1st)
if someone has some time to kill, I'd like to revive[1] libdumbnet
(O/ITA #474128). The last maintainer (i.e. non-NMU, non-QA) upload
was in XI/2003. No use looking at interdiffs/ debdiffs of the dsc,
this one is made from scratch[2].
Upstream is dormant s
9 matches
Mail list logo
