Joachim Wiedorn writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.32.1-5
> of my package "xfe".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> xfe- A lightweight file manager for X11
> xfe-i18n - A lightweight file manager for X11 (i18n support)
> xfe-themes - A lightweight file manager
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.32.1-5
of my package "xfe".
It builds these binary packages:
xfe- A lightweight file manager for X11
xfe-i18n - A lightweight file manager for X11 (i18n support)
xfe-themes - A lightweight file manager for X11 (themes)
The
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.32.1-5
of my package "xfe".
It builds these binary packages:
xfe- A lightweight file manager for X11
xfe-i18n - A lightweight file manager for X11 (i18n support)
xfe-themes - A lightweight file manager for X11 (themes)
The
Hi, Joachim.
On Jan 29 2010, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> The upload would fix this FTBFS bug: 560549
> Now xfe can be compiled on GNU/kFreeBSD architectures.
Thanks for taking care of kfreebsd.
Regards,
--
Rogério Brito : rbr...@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8
http://rb.doesntexi
Hello Christoph,
Christoph Egger wrote:
> Jep builds + works fine on kfreebsd-i386 (build and tested
> there, now uploading soon-to-hit the archive.
Thanks for testing and uploading!
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:07:59PM +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.32.1-3
> of my package "xfe".
>
> The upload would fix this FTBFS bug: 560549
> Now xfe can be compiled on GNU/kFreeBSD architectures.
Jep builds + works fine on kfreebsd-i386 (buil
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.32.1-3
of my package "xfe".
It builds these binary packages:
xfe- A lightweight file manager for X11
xfe-i18n - A lightweight file manager for X11 (i18n support)
xfe-themes - A lightweight file manager for X11 (themes)
The
Hello Rogério,
Am Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:45:42 -0200 schrieb
Rogério Brito :
> You should still give a hint (a short phrase is enough) that other
> people worked on the package and give them credit.
Done.
> > > * you can remove comments from the watch file.
> > Some lines came from the templa
Hi, Joachim.
On Nov 18 2009, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Am Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:56:08 -0200 schrieb
> Rogério Brito :
>
> oh oh, so a long list!
Well, I thought that you wanted some comments. :-)
> I still have not understand the difference between README and
> README.Debian. Perhaps that's the pr
2009/11/18 Rogério Brito :
> * in patch 01_no-mount-warning.patch, only linux is checked. What about
> the kFreeBSD's? Any bug with them is now considered release critical.
> Please, see if my comments apply or if they can be ignored.
A clarification to this:
FTBFS bugs are only severity impor
Hello Rogério,
Am Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:56:08 -0200 schrieb
Rogério Brito :
oh oh, so a long list!
> * the debian/README file talks about installation of some
> programs; this is useless if you are installing a precompiled package,
> because you, the maintainer, will have taken care of th
Hi, Joachim.
On Nov 16 2009, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Ok, I have to include intltool in the build dependencies. Please can
> you say me the other "minor things", so I can check them, too.
Well, this is just a quick look at the package:
* the debian/README file talks about installation of some
Hello,
> Ok, I have to include intltool in the build dependencies. Please can
> you say me the other "minor things", so I can check them, too.
The updated version with some minor changes is now on
mentors.debian.net. Now I think it is ready for uploading.
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
si
Hello Rogério,
Am Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:21:31 -0200 schrieb
Rogério Brito :
> The package seems to be missing a build-dep on intltool. There are some
> other minor things, but I can comment on them latter, with other
> releases (if I don't forget).
Ok, I have to include intltool in the build d
Hi, Joachim.
On Nov 15 2009, Joo Martin wrote:
> Now I have looked over all bug reports and I have seen the most of them
> are fixed. I have added "Closes" to the comments in my changelog file.
Thanks for taking care of xfe. I especially like the fact that it is
split to make it leaner.
> The up
Hello George,
Am Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:18:55 +0200 schrieb
George Danchev :
> A message sent to #529855 (Fwd: New Xfe version 1.18 and fixed bugs) says
> that
> some more bugs have been eventually fixed with that new upstream release, but
> I
> don't see them closed with your debian/change
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
I'm not using xfe, but here is my comment:
> the privios maintainer of xfe had set the package to RFA. Because the
> version is very old and with some bugs, there is a new upstream version
> available with bugfixes and new features.
>
> I would like to take over maintainanc
Dear mentors,
the privios maintainer of xfe had set the package to RFA. Because the
version is very old and with some bugs, there is a new upstream version
available with bugfixes and new features.
I would like to take over maintainance. So I am looking for a sponsor
for the new version 1.32.1-1
18 matches
Mail list logo
