Re: RFS: xbmc

2009-12-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Andres Mejia wrote: > On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:15:40 Paul Wise wrote: >> Sounds undistributable to me (not even non-free), unless the XBMC >> license is changed to the LGPL or there is a GPL exception for linking >> against non-free code. > > Which license

Re: RFS: xbmc

2009-12-16 Thread Andres Mejia
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 21:15:40 Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Andres Mejia wrote: > > XBMC is licensed under the GPL-2+. There are various third party code and > > libraries used as well, documented in the copyright file. There are also > > various files and third part

Re: RFS: xbmc

2009-12-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Andres Mejia wrote: > XBMC is licensed under the GPL-2+. There are various third party code and > libraries used as well, documented in the copyright file. There are also > various > files and third party code used with licenses that have non-DFSG clauses. > None

RFS: xbmc

2009-12-16 Thread Andres Mejia
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xbmc". * Package name: xbmc Version : 1:9.11~svn25756.rc1~deb1-1 Main Contact: "Team-XBMC" Upstream Author(s) : Andreas Setterlind [Gamester17] Staffan Lindberg [pike]