Re: RFS: videogen 0.32-1

2003-07-17 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Doesn't work, changes in the script are needed because of the new > parameter syntax. What do you mean, "doesn't work"? I changed the script to conform to the new parameter syntax -- packaging things which aren't tested and can't work isn't my style. ;-) The script d

Re: RFS: videogen 0.32-1

2003-07-16 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Doesn't work, changes in the script are needed because of the new > parameter syntax. What do you mean, "doesn't work"? I changed the script to conform to the new parameter syntax -- packaging things which aren't tested and can't work isn't my style. ;-) The script d

Re: RFS: videogen 0.32-1

2003-07-16 Thread Eduard Bloch
Moin Matthias! Matthias Urlichs schrieb am Wednesday, den 16. July 2003: > *Sigh* Upstream has deleted it in version 0.30. > But you're right, it makes sense to have that. > > [ Time passes ] > > OK -- I have resurrected some_modes.sh and updated the package. > If somebody can check that the too

Re: RFS: videogen 0.32-1

2003-07-16 Thread Eduard Bloch
Moin Matthias! Matthias Urlichs schrieb am Wednesday, den 16. July 2003: > *Sigh* Upstream has deleted it in version 0.30. > But you're right, it makes sense to have that. > > [ Time passes ] > > OK -- I have resurrected some_modes.sh and updated the package. > If somebody can check that the too

Re: RFS: videogen 0.32-1

2003-07-16 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Eduard Bloch wrote: > If you implement the user interface in some_modes.sh (my old patch) or a > similar thing, I will sponsor it. *Sigh* Upstream has deleted it in version 0.30. But you're right, it makes sense to have that. [ Time passes ] OK -- I have resurrected some_modes.sh and update

Re: RFS: videogen 0.32-1

2003-07-16 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Eduard Bloch wrote: > If you implement the user interface in some_modes.sh (my old patch) or a > similar thing, I will sponsor it. *Sigh* Upstream has deleted it in version 0.30. But you're right, it makes sense to have that. [ Time passes ] OK -- I have resurrected some_modes.sh and update

Re: RFS: videogen 0.32-1

2003-07-16 Thread Eduard Bloch
Moin Matthias! Matthias Urlichs schrieb am Wednesday, den 16. July 2003: > The package is lintian and linda clean. > Download: http://smurf.noris.de/code/debian/unstable/source/videogen* > APT: deb-src http://smurf.noris.de/code/debian/ unstable smurf > > videogen (0.32-1) unstable; urgency=low >

Re: RFS: videogen 0.32-1

2003-07-16 Thread Eduard Bloch
Moin Matthias! Matthias Urlichs schrieb am Wednesday, den 16. July 2003: > The package is lintian and linda clean. > Download: http://smurf.noris.de/code/debian/unstable/source/videogen* > APT: deb-src http://smurf.noris.de/code/debian/ unstable smurf > > videogen (0.32-1) unstable; urgency=low >

RFS: videogen 0.32-1

2003-07-15 Thread Matthias Urlichs
I have decided to adopt the orphaned "videogen" package (bug #122708). As I am waiting for DAM, I need a sponsor. The package is lintian and linda clean. Download: http://smurf.noris.de/code/debian/unstable/source/videogen* APT: deb-src http://smurf.noris.de/code/debian/ unstable smurf videogen (

RFS: videogen 0.32-1

2003-07-15 Thread Matthias Urlichs
I have decided to adopt the orphaned "videogen" package (bug #122708). As I am waiting for DAM, I need a sponsor. The package is lintian and linda clean. Download: http://smurf.noris.de/code/debian/unstable/source/videogen* APT: deb-src http://smurf.noris.de/code/debian/ unstable smurf videogen (