Re: RFS: tstat

2009-04-25 Thread Ben Finney
Eduardo Ferro writes: > I'll improve the description... I think that I wrote the bin desc and > forget to wrote the corresponding desc for the libs,, > > Thanks, and sorry everyone for my poor English No apology necessary; thank you for your efforts writing a description which can then be impro

Re: RFS: tstat

2009-04-25 Thread Eduardo Ferro
Hi! > > > libtstat-dev - development library for libtstat > > libtstat0 - runtime libtstat library > > These synopses don't communicate much useful information. The synopsis > should say what the ‘libtstat’ library *is*. > I'll improve the description... I think that I wrote the bin desc and for

Re: RFS: tstat

2009-04-25 Thread Ben Finney
Eduardo Ferro writes: > libtstat-dev - development library for libtstat > libtstat0 - runtime libtstat library These synopses don't communicate much useful information. The synopsis should say what the ‘libtstat’ library *is*. > tstat - TCP statistic and analysys tool This is the right i

RFS: tstat

2009-04-25 Thread Eduardo Ferro
From: Eduardo Ferro To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: tstat Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tstat". * Package name: tstat Version : 2.0.1-4 Upstream Authors : Marco Mellia Dario Rossi < dario.ro...@enst.fr> * URL

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-09-08 Thread James Westby
On (03/09/06 23:21), Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hi mentors, > some days have passed since this RFS, and I still don't know what to do... > > As per email come: > > 1. erf.c has a license BSD-like > 2. BSD licenses are DFSG-compatible > 3. BSD-with-4-clause could lead to issues combining that code with

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-09-03 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi mentors, some days have passed since this RFS, and I still don't know what to do... As per email come: 1. erf.c has a license BSD-like 2. BSD licenses are DFSG-compatible 3. BSD-with-4-clause could lead to issues combining that code with GPL-ed one (as main of the rest of the code) So, what

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-08-22 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:53:26PM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit : > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:37:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > Last week-end I was told by a DD that the 4-clause BSD licence was > > non-free... Do you have any link in the archives which proves the > > contrary? This is

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-08-22 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Charles Plessy said: > Le Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit : > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:21:47AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > > 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software > > > must display the follow

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-08-22 Thread Bruce Sass
On Tue August 22 2006 15:47, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 8/23/06, Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon August 21 2006 17:37, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Last week-end I was told by a DD that the 4-clause BSD licence > > > was non-free... Do you have any link in the archives which prov

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-08-22 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 8/23/06, Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon August 21 2006 17:37, Charles Plessy wrote: > Last week-end I was told by a DD that the 4-clause BSD licence was > non-free... Do you have any link in the archives which proves the > contrary? This is very interesting for me as I am interes

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-08-22 Thread Bruce Sass
On Mon August 21 2006 17:37, Charles Plessy wrote: > Last week-end I was told by a DD that the 4-clause BSD licence was > non-free... Do you have any link in the archives which proves the > contrary? This is very interesting for me as I am interested in > bringing to Debian an unofficial package wh

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-08-22 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:37:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit : > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:21:47AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > > 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software > > > must disp

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-08-21 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit : > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:21:47AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software > > must display the following acknowledgement: > >This product includes soft

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-08-21 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:21:47AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > Sandro Tosi wrote: > > * Package name: tstat > > IANAL (I am not a lawyer), but I wonder if we shouldn't ask debian-legal > about these license clauses for erf.c: > > 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of t

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-08-20 Thread tony mancill
Sandro Tosi wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tstat". > > * Package name: tstat > Version : 1.01-1 > Upstream Author : Dario Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marco Mellia > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://tstat.tlc.polito.it/ > * Licens

RFS: tstat

2006-08-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tstat". * Package name: tstat Version : 1.01-1 Upstream Author : Dario Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marco Mellia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://tstat.tlc.polito.it/ * License : GPL2 Section : ne