Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-12 Thread Ben Finney
Karl Ferdinand Ebert writes: > Hi, > > Am Thursday 12 March 2009 07:37:11 schrieb Kapil Hari Paranjape: > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > > > Not so! :-( > > There are Lintian errors in your manpage (hyphen used as minus sign)

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 > of my package "tmux". Here are some comments: - add FAQ to docs - add CHANGES file as upstream changelog - ITP bug will be closed by the first upload not the first packaging attempt

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Paul Wise wrote: > This sounds very much like 'screen', what advantages does it have over > 'screen'? Just quoting from the FAQ: * How is tmux different from GNU screen? What else does it offer? tmux offers several advantages over screen: - a clearly-de

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > tmux       - terminal multiplexer This sounds very much like 'screen', what advantages does it have over 'screen'? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 23:23:39 schrieb Ben Finney: > Karl Ferdinand Ebert writes: > > Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: > > > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been > > > uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you > > > chang

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Ben Finney
Karl Ferdinand Ebert writes: > Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: > > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been > > uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you > > changelog entry for the first release, it is only state «Closes: > > #

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Hi, Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:35:38PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 > > of my package "tmux". > > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package wa

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread René Mayorga
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:35:38PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 > of my package "tmux". > Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you c

RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 of my package "tmux". It builds these binary packages: tmux - terminal multiplexer The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/

RFS: tmux (updated package)

2008-12-17 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tmux". * Package name: tmux Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : Nicholas Marriott * URL : http://sf.net/projects/tmux * License : BSD Section : admin It builds these binary packages: tmux