Your message dated Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:23:29 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tilda/1.1.5-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #702072,
regarding RFS: tilda/1.1.5-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi Anton,
I have just uploaded the package again (I added -Wl,--as-needed, to the
src/Makefile, that fixed the issue). I also changed the version to
1.1.5, which was actually the last version I had tagged in git. Are you
now going to upload the package for me?
Kind Regards
Sebastian
On 20/0
On 03/19/2013 11:26 PM, Lanoxx wrote:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
> debian/tilda/usr/bin/tilda was not linked against libcairo-gobject.so.2
> (it uses none of the library's symbols)
>
> Do you know how to fix that?
You can try to add "--as-needed" param
Hi Anton,
thanks a lot, that works very well. I had to remove the mkdir in the
override_dh_auto_install though, otherwise I was getting an error.
When I build the package with pbuilder I get the following warning:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
debian/ti
Hi Sebastian,
I asked you to clean debian/rules. See an attachment.
Anton
On 03/19/2013 03:56 PM, Sebastian Geiger wrote:
> I just uploaded the package again. I have added a comment explaining
> that I have run blhc to confirm that the hardening warning override in
> lintian is justified and als
I just uploaded the package again. I have added a comment explaining
that I have run blhc to confirm that the hardening warning override in
lintian is justified and also removed some commented out lines from
debian/rules to make it more clean. Also I have commited all the changes
to the git rep
Hi Sebastian,
On 03/10/2013 03:48 PM, Lanoxx wrote:
> Added autopoint as build dependency, now it should work. But when I run
> pbuilder --build to build it inside a debian chroot, then I still get
> some configure errors. I have to assume that some build dependencies are
> missing, but I really d
Hi Anton,
thanks for reviewing my package. I have added a new branch
tilda-debian-1-1 to my github repository and put the debian/ folder in
there, more comments below:
On 02/03/13 16:19, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for working on this package. I think it is ok to switch to a fo
On 03/02/2013 02:23 PM, Lanoxx wrote:
> Note that I'm targeting unstable not experimental, because I believe
> that given the amount of bugs my package fixes makes this package more
> stable than the one which is currently in unstable.
Due to a freeze, I would suggest to target it to experimental
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for working on this package. I think it is ok to switch to a fork
as the original software is not developed any more.
Some notes/questions on your package:
1) Remove changelog.new.
2) Use VCS for maintaining the package and uncomment corresponding lines
in control-file.
3) C
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tilda"
* Package name: tilda
Version : 1.1.4-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Geiger
* URL : https://github.com/lanoxx/tilda
* License : GPL-2
Sectio
CC: David Truffa, Filippo Giunchedi
@David, could you please take a look at this discussion and let me know
if you still maintain tilda or if you are willing to put it up for adoption.
@Filippo, you already told me that you are not maintaining tilda
anymore, but you are still listed as maintainer t
On 2013-02-17 21:50:38 +0100 (+0100), Lanoxx wrote:
[...]
> Unfortunately I do not have any packaging experience and currently
> hardly the time to learn it. I tried it a few times before and it
> does not seem to be an easy process. I am therefore looking for a
> sponsore to package and upload til
Hello Everyone,
this is my first message to this list. I have recently picked up the
development of tilda. The current package in debian and ubuntu is from
2009 and has version 0.9.6. I got in touch with the previous developers
(Ira Snyder, Tristan Sloughter) and they are both not developing i
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 01:27]:
> Nico Golde ha scritto:
> > [...]
> >
> > Davide, I looked at your updated package, I am not yet
> > gratified with the copyright document. Here my proposal for
> > what it should look like:
> >
> > [...]
>
> I fixed it with yo
Nico Golde ha scritto:
> [...]
>
> Davide, I looked at your updated package, I am not yet
> gratified with the copyright document. Here my proposal for
> what it should look like:
>
> [...]
I fixed it with your suggestions.
Thanks,
Davide Truffa.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Hi,
* Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-16 21:11]:
> On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 17:46 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Tobias Richter ha scritto:
> >
> > > Exactly like you he has version 0.09.4-1 ready for sponsoring:
> >
> > I'm sorry, I didn't know it.
> > I wrote many mails to Zak Elep
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 17:46 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tobias Richter ha scritto:
>
> > Exactly like you he has version 0.09.4-1 ready for sponsoring:
>
> I'm sorry, I didn't know it.
> I wrote many mails to Zak Elep when I propose myself has co-maintainer,
> if necessary, but I didn't get
Tobias Richter ha scritto:
> Exactly like you he has version 0.09.4-1 ready for sponsoring:
I'm sorry, I didn't know it.
I wrote many mails to Zak Elep when I propose myself has co-maintainer,
if necessary, but I didn't get any answer.
Anyway I'm glad to tell Nico Golde to sponsoring him.
My big
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Because Zak Elep, that should be the new maintainer, didn't do
> nothing yet, like I said in my previous mail.
Exactly like you he has version 0.09.4-1 ready for sponsoring:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tilda/
Sitting there since Jan 30th.
Tobias
--
Michael Koch ha scritto:
> Why do it again? on 30th of january Zak Elep offered the same. You
> guys should really work together instead of against each other.
Because Zak Elep, that should be the new maintainer, didn't do
nothing yet, like I said in my previous mail.
Moreover, when I reported my
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:19:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for a sponsor, yes of course.
>
> I rebuilt the package "tilda"[1] with the new upstream version because
> the new maintainer[2] never done anything. :-P
> Here[3] there is my wishlist bug about tilda.
>
> Pa
Hi,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-16 12:45]:
> I'm looking for a sponsor, yes of course.
>
> I rebuilt the package "tilda"[1] with the new upstream version because
> the new maintainer[2] never done anything. :-P
> Here[3] there is my wishlist bug about tilda.
>
> Package nam
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor, yes of course.
I rebuilt the package "tilda"[1] with the new upstream version because
the new maintainer[2] never done anything. :-P
Here[3] there is my wishlist bug about tilda.
Package name: tilda
Version : 0.09.4-1
Upstream Authors: Tristan Slou
Dearest Debian Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.09.4-1 of my package
"tilda" for which I have posted an ITA notice some time ago.[1]
It builds these binary packages:
tilda - terminal with first person shooter console likeness
The package is lintian clean.
The uploa
25 matches
Mail list logo
