Re: RFS: tikiwiki

2006-07-08 Thread Daniel Baumann
Marcus Better wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for Tikiwiki, a groupware and content management > system. I have just packaged a new upstream version 1.9.4. (The previous > version is only in experimental, but I think it should be ready for > unstable now.) I'm very interested in sponsoring tik

Re: RFS: tikiwiki

2006-07-06 Thread Marcus Better
Alec Berryman wrote: > The version in experimental is probably vulnerable to CVE-2006-3048, > CVE-2006-3047, and CVE-2006-2635. These are resolved in 1.9.4 according to information here: http://tikiwiki.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=131 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18143 http://www.sec

Re: RFS: tikiwiki

2006-07-05 Thread Alec Berryman
Marcus Better on 2006-07-05 15:39:55 +0200: > Hello, > > I am looking for a sponsor for Tikiwiki, a groupware and content management > system. I have just packaged a new upstream version 1.9.4. (The previous > version is only in experimental, but I think it should be ready for > unstable now.) >

RFS: tikiwiki

2006-07-05 Thread Marcus Better
Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for Tikiwiki, a groupware and content management system. I have just packaged a new upstream version 1.9.4. (The previous version is only in experimental, but I think it should be ready for unstable now.) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net at http:/

Re: RFS: tikiwiki

2006-01-10 Thread Christoph Haas
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 13:13, Marcus Better wrote: > I am renewing my request for a sponsor for Tikiwiki. I would like to > upload it to experimental for easier access, so that I can get it more > widely tested. Roughly checked and uploaded to experimental. Good luck with the package. Kindly

Re: RFS: tikiwiki

2006-01-10 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I am renewing my request for a sponsor for Tikiwiki. I would like to upload it to experimental for easier access, so that I can get it more widely tested. > Package name: tikiwiki > Version : 1.9.2 > Upstream Author : Luis Ar

Re: RFS: tikiwiki

2006-01-03 Thread Marcus Better
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > http://moritz-naumann.com/adv/0003/tikiw/0003.txt > Is this fixed in your package, the advisory says that 1.9.2 is affected > as well? The developers claim that 1.9.2 is not vulnerable, contrary to what was stated in the advisory. See http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-L

Re: RFS: tikiwiki

2006-01-03 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Marcus Better wrote: > Package name: tikiwiki > Version : 1.9.2 http://moritz-naumann.com/adv/0003/tikiw/0003.txt Is this fixed in your package, the advisory says that 1.9.2 is affected as well? (The path disclosure is not an issue, but the XSS could be) Given that there've been f

RFS: tikiwiki

2006-01-03 Thread Marcus Better
I am looking for a sponsor for this package. Package name: tikiwiki Version : 1.9.2 Upstream Author : Luis Argerich, Garland Foster, Eduardo Polidor, et. al. URL or Web page : http://tikiwiki.org License : LGPL Description : groupware and content management syst