Re: RFS: tacacs+ (updated package)

2010-02-08 Thread Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
Sorry for the bad subject, I meant RFS, of course. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: tacacs+

2010-02-06 Thread Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
On Friday 05 February 2010 13:39:18 Craig Small wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:30:26PM +0100, Tourneur Henry-Nicolas wrote: > > I just did so and normally, I should have fixed all of the lintian Errors > > and Warnings. Could somebody review my package again ? > > > > Thanks everybody for taki

Re: RFS: tacacs+

2010-02-05 Thread Craig Small
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:30:26PM +0100, Tourneur Henry-Nicolas wrote: > I just did so and normally, I should have fixed all of the lintian Errors and > Warnings. Could somebody review my package again ? > > Thanks everybody for taking time to help me. I was wondering why you have put the binari

Re: RFS: tacacs+

2010-02-04 Thread Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
> > The trick is to run lintian on the changes file, as it does both source > and binary package checking, otherwise it only does source (.dsc) or > binary (.deb) > > - Craig > Hi, I just did so and normally, I should have fixed all of the lintian Errors and Warnings. Could somebody review my

Re: RFS: tacacs+

2010-02-03 Thread Craig Small
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 09:54:20PM +0100, Tourneur Henry-Nicolas wrote: > I did upload a new version of the package, which should fix most of those > issue. I'll have a look at it. > 1° I didn't manage to get #1 fixed, I guess I should use dh_clean or dh_prep > but I don't know how to. I'll look

Re: RFS: tacacs+

2010-02-03 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 21:54 +0100, Tourneur Henry-Nicolas wrote: > 2° Which version of lintian do you use to get those warnings and errors ? I > got an updated sid version of lintian but no messages :( I guess I fixed #2, > #3 > and 4 but it's just based on your description of the problem (than

Re: RFS: tacacs+

2010-02-03 Thread Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
> > #1 - You are using dpatch patch system, but you have difference in your > source files that are not in dpatch. It looks like you are not deleting > generated files, such as users_guide and the debhelper log files. > > #2 - change the standards line to 3.8.4 in debian/control. > #3 and #4 are

Re: RFS: tacacs+

2010-02-02 Thread Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
"Craig Small" Ecrivait: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:08:37PM +0100, Tourneur Henry-Nicolas wrote: >> * License : No license, only a copyright file > If there was no license, then you couldn't distribute it. The license > is what is in the COPYING file which is very MIT-like. I'm pretty su

Re: RFS: tacacs+

2010-02-02 Thread Craig Small
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:08:37PM +0100, Tourneur Henry-Nicolas wrote: > * License : No license, only a copyright file If there was no license, then you couldn't distribute it. The license is what is in the COPYING file which is very MIT-like. I'm pretty sure it's ok. > The package is al

RFS: tacacs+

2010-02-02 Thread Tourneur Henry-Nicolas
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tacacs+". * Package name: tacacs+ Version : 4.0.4.19-1 Upstream Author : Shrubbery * URL : http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/ * License : No license, only a copyright file Section : net It buil