Bug#740032: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 02 Dec 2014 16:26:49 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #740032, regarding RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

2014-07-31 16:16 GMT-03:00 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com>: > >> Do you made a unique tarball from two independent zips? > > Yes, they are usually released together. s-furniture and > s-furniture-nonfree already work this way, by packaging respectively 5 > and 3 zipfiles. > I don't recall why

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Eriberto Mota wrote: > Hum... Not a good reply... I should find the download site in > d/copyright header. Right, fixed on git http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/sweethome3d-textures.git > Do you made a unique tarball from two independent zips? Yes, they ar

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

Hum... Not a good reply... I should find the download site in d/copyright header. Do you made a unique tarball from two independent zips? Other question: why your team doesn't sponsored your package? Waiting... Eriberto 2014-07-31 14:39 GMT-03:00 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com>: > On Thu

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Eriberto Mota wrote: > Hi want help you (as sponsor). Where I can find the original upstream tarball? debian/watch file and "debian/rules get-orig-source" should help. http://sourceforge.net/projects/sweethome3d/files/SweetHome3D-textures/Textures-1.0.1/ I alrea

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP]

tags 740032 moreinfo thanks Hi Gabrielle, Hi want help you (as sponsor). Where I can find the original upstream tarball? Thanks! Regards, Eriberto pgpJ1tys94yku.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#740032: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2014 04:24:02 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #740032, regarding RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#740032: RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sweethome3d-textures" * Package name: sweethome3d-textures Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret eTeks * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/ * Licens

Bug#690010: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:50:21 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #690010, regarding RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#689167: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree/1.2-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:36:00 + with message-id <20121012053600.gb30...@master.debian.org> and subject line RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree/1.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #689167, regarding RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree/1.2-1 [ITP] to be marked a

Bug#689126: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d-furniture/1.2-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:34:17 + with message-id <20121012053417.ga30...@master.debian.org> and subject line RFS: sweethome3d-furniture/1.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #689126, regarding RFS: sweethome3d-furniture/1.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#690010: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

On 10/08/2012 04:25 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: block 689980 by -1 > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sweethome3d-furniture-editor" Hi Gabriele, I am reviewing this package and will sponsor an upload

Bug#690010: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

Sorry, correct dsc path is http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furniture-editor/sweethome3d-furniture-editor_1.8-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Processed: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

Processing control commands: > block 689980 by -1 Bug #689980 [wnpp] ITP: sweethome3d-furniture-editor -- Sweet Home 3D Furniture Library Editor 689980 was not blocked by any bugs. 689980 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 689980: 690010 -- 689980: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#690010: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 689980 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sweethome3d-furniture-editor" * Package name: sweethome3d-furniture-editor Version : 1.8-1 Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret, eTeks * URL

Bug#689126: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture{,nonfree}/1.2-1 [ITP]

Renamed to furniture (w/o "s") and reuploaded. http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furniture http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-furniture-nonfree dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-furniture/sweethome3d-furniture_1.2-1.dsc dget -x http://mentor

Processed: RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures{,-nonfree}/1.2-1 [ITP]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 689126 -1 Bug #689126 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures{,-nonfree}/1.2-1 [ITP] Bug 689126 cloned as bug 689167 > retitle 689126 RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures/1.2-1 [ITP] Bug #689126 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: sweet

Processed: RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures{,-nonfree}/1.2-1 [ITP]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 689126 wishlist Bug #689126 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures{,-nonfree}/1.2-1 [ITP] Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#689126: RFS: sweethome3d-furnitures{,-nonfree}/1.2-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "sweethome3d-furnitures" and "sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree" * Package name: sweethome3d-furnitures Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : Various SweetHome3D contributors

Bug#659243: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo])

Your message dated Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:15:48 +0100 with message-id <4f37ad74.7090...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo] has caused the Debian Bug report #659243, regarding RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo] to be marked as done.

Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

Both links: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-9~bpo60+1.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d/sweethome3d_3.4+dfsg-1~bpo60+1.dsc On 02/09/2012 04:17 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > On 02/09/2012 04:04 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >

Re: Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

On 02/09/2012 04:04 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > tag 659243 + moreinfo > thanks > > On 02/09/2012 03:15 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: >> Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me? > > What about [1]? Feb 09 12:15:37Ganneff: I'm a DM, we have 2 packages with DMUA s

Processed: Re: Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 659243 + moreinfo Bug #659243 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo] Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 659243: http://bugs.debian.o

Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

tag 659243 + moreinfo thanks On 02/09/2012 03:15 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me? What about [1]? Also please don't sent both a RFS mail and a bug report -- both arrive at the same list. Regards, Ansgar [1]

Bug#659243: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

Package: sponsorship-requests Packages available at ftp://backports-master.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue Original Message Subject: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo] Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:52:39 +0100 From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> To:

Re: RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

Gabriele Giacone schrieb am Donnerstag, den 09. Februar 2012: > [ cc'ing d-mentors for RFS and mentors.d.o problems ] > > Hi, > following [0], first upload has to be sponsored. > Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me? > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/mai

RFS: sweethome3d and sunflow [DM uploads to bpo]

[ cc'ing d-mentors for RFS and mentors.d.o problems ] Hi, following [0], first upload has to be sponsored. Could anyone please upload sweethome3d and sunflow to backports for me? http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunflow/sunflow_0.07.2.svn396+dfsg-9~bpo60+1.dsc [sweethome3d link is mis

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2010 02:39 PM, Michal Čihař wrote: >>> Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in >>> Build-Depends-Indep, because it is required for clean. >> It seems you're not satisfying build dependencies (d-bp with "-d" opti

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:39:50 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > No, please read: > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps > > The problem is that default-jdk is listed in Build-Depends-Indep, while > it should be in Build-Depends because it is also required for

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

Hi. On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:56:23 +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:39:50 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: >> No, please read: >> > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps >> >> The problem is that default-jdk is listed in Build-Depends-

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

Hi Dne Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:56:23 +0100 Giovanni Mascellani napsal(a): > On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:39:50 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > > No, please read: > > > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps > > > > The problem is that default-jdk is listed in Build-

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:09:50 +0100 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > On 03/03/2010 09:56 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > > Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in > > Build-Depends-Indep, because it is

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2010 09:56 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: >> Okay, I'm probably doing something wrong here, but it fails to >> build: > >> dh_testroot >> You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD! >> make: *** [maven-sanity-check] Error 1 >> dpkg-buildpackage:

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > >> The package is lintian clean and needs freehep-xml and > >> freehep-graphicsio-svg which are in NEW. > > > >

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:46:35 +0100 Michal Čihař napsal(a): > > http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-2.dsc > > http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-graphicsio-svg_2.1.1-1.dsc > > Okay, I'm proba

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/02/2010 11:05 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > For example because GPL-3 is not compatible with GPL-2 by itself. So > once the code is under GPL-3 you can not use it in GPL-2 licensed > program. > Also I don't see reason why you should limit Debian user

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:39:10 +0100 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > Actual before or after our choice? We are redistributing it and we can > choose whether releasing it under version 2 or 3. > "What reason for that?" Why not? >

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/02/2010 12:26 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > Hi > > Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100 > Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > >> On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal ihaY wrote: >>> The license seems to be GPL-2+ (at least all file headers

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > > The license seems to be GPL-2+ (at least all file headers I checked say > > so). Please fix it in debian/copyrig

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michal, On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: > The license seems to be GPL-2+ (at least all file headers I checked say > so). Please fix it in debian/copyright. "you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Pub

Re: RFS: sweethome3d

Hi Dne Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:56:24 +0100 Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > * Package name: sweethome3d >Version : 2.2+dfsg-1 >Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret, eTeks > * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.eu/ > * License : GPL-3+ The license s

RFS: sweethome3d

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sweethome3d". * Package name: sweethome3d Version : 2.2+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret, eTeks * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.eu/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : java It builds these