Re: RFS: swath 0.3.4-1 (updated package)

2008-04-06 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.4-1 > of my package "swath". Caveat: there remains a gcc warning about the unsecure 'tmpnam' usage. I as upstream maintainer has fixed such warnings in other

RFS: swath 0.3.4-1 (updated package)

2008-04-06 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.4-1 of my package "swath". It builds these binary packages: swath - Thai word segmentation program The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debi

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.3-1 (updated package)

2008-03-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, I have uploaded a new package with raised urgency. Please find it > at the old place: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swath/swath_0.3.3-1.dsc > > debian/changelog timestamp: Sun, 23 M

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.3-1 (updated package)

2008-03-22 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:11:46 +0900, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In fact, using mkstemp() instead of tmpnam() means quite substantial > > change to the program logic, because the temp files a

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.3-1 (updated package)

2008-03-22 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Err.. I'm not sure if it's appropriate to introduce a big change > just to get a serious bug fix delivered. I'm afraid it would > risk introducing new bugs working in hurry as well. > > Here are summarized

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.3-1 (updated package)

2008-03-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This may be better done by a new upstream release. Indeed. > In fact, using mkstemp() instead of tmpnam() means quite substantial > change to the program logic, because the temp files are actually > creat

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.3-1 (updated package)

2008-03-22 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:37:38 +0900, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please fix this GCC warning, after that I will upload: > > > > /tmp/buildd/swath-0.3.3/src/wordseg.cpp:244: warning: the use of >

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.3-1 (updated package)

2008-03-22 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:37:38 +0900, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-1 > > of my package "swath". > > Please fix this GCC warning, after that

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.3-1 (updated package)

2008-03-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-1 > of my package "swath". Please fix this GCC warning, after that I will upload: /tmp/buildd/swath-0.3.3/src/wordseg.cpp:244: warning: the use of `tmpna

RFS: swath 0.3.3-1 (updated package)

2008-03-20 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-1 of my package "swath". This new upstream version fixes a serious regression in previous version. It builds these binary packages: swath - Thai word segmentation program The package appears to be lintian clean. The packag

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-06 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Feb 6, 2008 9:20 PM, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the record, some reasons for asking upstream not to include a > debian/ directory in the released tarballs: > > > http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/on_debian_directories_in_upstream_tarballs/ It's not included. For swat

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-06 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Feb 6, 2008 9:10 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uploaded, please contact this list for future uploads. Thank you. > For next time: > > Well, I just checked the Vcs-* links, they seem to point to upstream > rather than the Debian packaging. They also have a debian dir in them > tha

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 06/02/2008, Paul Wise wrote: > Well, I just checked the Vcs-* links, they seem to point to upstream > rather than the Debian packaging. They also have a debian dir in > them that doesn't seem to be updated. For the record, some reasons for asking upstream not to include a debian/ directory in t

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Feb 6, 2008 8:41 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Done and uploaded: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swath/swath_0.3.2-1.dsc Uploaded, please contact this list for future uploads. > Other changes left? For next time: Well, I just checked the Vcs-

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-06 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Feb 6, 2008 6:27 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 5, 2008 9:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > blurbs-missing-in-licence > > > > Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug. > > Please revert that, sorry for the noise. Done and uploaded: http:/

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Feb 5, 2008 9:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > blurbs-missing-in-licence > > Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug. Please revert that, sorry for the noise. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Feb 5, 2008 9:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > blurbs-missing-in-licence > > Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug. Please revert that, sorry for the noise. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-05 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Feb 5, 2008 7:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks a lot for all your comments. Except for the commas-missing-in-copyright issue, I believe all others are resolved. So, I've uploaded it: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swath/swath_0.3.2-1.dsc Pl

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-05 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Feb 5, 2008 2:49 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > debian/control: > > s/insert/inserting/ Done. > debian/copyright: > > files-in-licence Fixed. > commas-missing-in-copyright Not-a-bug, wontfix. > blurbs-missing-in-licence Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug. > debian/rul

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-04 Thread Paul Wise
A review of your package: debian/control: s/insert/inserting/ debian/copyright: files-in-licence commas-missing-in-copyright blurbs-missing-in-licence debian/rules: nostrip is handled by dh_strip now CFLAGS doesn't seem to be passed to configure h, not sure about make -j2 - isn't there

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-03 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Feb 3, 2008 10:31 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 2, 2008 1:13 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swath > > - Source repository: d

Re: RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-02 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On Feb 2, 2008 1:13 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swath > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget http

RFS: swath 0.3.2-1 (updated package)

2008-02-01 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.2-1 of my package "swath". It builds these binary packages: swath - Thai word segmentation program The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debi

Re: RFS: swath

2006-07-02 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/2/06, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:37:37PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: >I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Done. Thank you very much for your quick help. I rea

Re: RFS: swath

2006-07-01 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:37:37PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: >I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Done. Best Regards, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- http://v7w.com/anibal signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: swath

2006-06-30 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.1-1 of my package "swath". It builds these binary packages: swath - Thai word segmentation program The package is lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 357877 The pac

RFS: swath - Thai word segmentation program

2006-04-23 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
Dear mentors, I have adopted the orphaned swath package: http://bugs.debian.org/357877 Now I have updated the package with new upstream version. Sponsoring is needed for the upload. Here is the package information: Package: swath License: GPL Description: This is a free word segmentation pro