Am Montag, 24. Mai 2010, 12:03:15 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt:
> Why not use 2.0~b1-1 as a version number? It is easier to understand and
> still sorts before a stable 2.0-1 release.
Don’t know, I read it somewhere, but can’t remember where. There are so many
places with different information in the
Quoting "Stefan Haller" :
Dear mentors,
I upgraded the package “sqlitebrowser” to a new upstream release. The latest
release is 2.0b1. That’s why I’ve choosen “1.9+2.0b1-1” as Debian
version number.
The package uses now the the new dpkg-source format “3.0 quilt”, so
I’ve changed
many files
Hi,
[ CCed sqlitebrowser's maintainer ]
Stefan Haller writes:
> I upgraded the package “sqlitebrowser” to a new upstream
> release. The latest release is 2.0b1. That’s why I’ve choosen
> “1.9+2.0b1-1” as Debian version number. The package uses now the the
> new dpkg-source format “3.0 quilt”, s
Dear mentors,
I upgraded the package “sqlitebrowser” to a new upstream release. The latest
release is 2.0b1. That’s why I’ve choosen “1.9+2.0b1-1” as Debian version
number.
The package uses now the the new dpkg-source format “3.0 quilt”, so I’ve changed
many files in the debian/-directory. (I hop
4 matches
Mail list logo
