Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread John Hedges
[...] > Usually I would not change a sponsored package before uploading, but I > wanted to get it in before dinstall runs, shortly before sarge time is > an issue. - I do hope that is ok for you. I'm more than happy. Thanks for all your help :) Cheers John

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread John Hedges
[...] > Usually I would not change a sponsored package before uploading, but I > wanted to get it in before dinstall runs, shortly before sarge time is > an issue. - I do hope that is ok for you. I'm more than happy. Thanks for all your help :) Cheers John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:58:26PM +0100, John Hedges wrote: [...] > I've put a new copy at the above address. I made a last minute change to debian/control and uploaded the package. -Description: Sound player for MPEG-1,2 layer 1,2,3 Based on maplay, this - package decodes layer I, II, and III M

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread John Hedges
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 04:30:42PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:24:52PM +0100, John Hedges wrote: > [...] > > If you feel inclined to take a further look, 0.9.5.2-6 is now at > > http://www.callpoint.org/splay/ > > Almost ok. debian/control must not hardcode the shli

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:58:26PM +0100, John Hedges wrote: [...] > I've put a new copy at the above address. I made a last minute change to debian/control and uploaded the package. -Description: Sound player for MPEG-1,2 layer 1,2,3 Based on maplay, this - package decodes layer I, II, and III M

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread John Hedges
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 04:30:42PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:24:52PM +0100, John Hedges wrote: > [...] > > If you feel inclined to take a further look, 0.9.5.2-6 is now at > > http://www.callpoint.org/splay/ > > Almost ok. debian/control must not hardcode the shli

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:24:52PM +0100, John Hedges wrote: [...] > If you feel inclined to take a further look, 0.9.5.2-6 is now at > http://www.callpoint.org/splay/ Almost ok. debian/control must not hardcode the shlibs-dependencies, use ${shlibs:Depends} instead. cu andreas

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread John Hedges
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:35:41PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2004-08-16 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > There is a slight complication: the QA team uploaded a version that > > fixed some arch bugs by setting architecture to all [1]. I don't seem to > > be able to get the

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:24:52PM +0100, John Hedges wrote: [...] > If you feel inclined to take a further look, 0.9.5.2-6 is now at > http://www.callpoint.org/splay/ Almost ok. debian/control must not hardcode the shlibs-dependencies, use ${shlibs:Depends} instead. cu andreas

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread John Hedges
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:35:41PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2004-08-16 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > There is a slight complication: the QA team uploaded a version that > > fixed some arch bugs by setting architecture to all [1]. I don't seem to > > be able to get the

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-08-16 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > There is a slight complication: the QA team uploaded a version that > fixed some arch bugs by setting architecture to all [1]. I don't seem to > be able to get the latest sources [...] 0.9.5.2-5 is available on every mirror, e.g. http://

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread John Hedges
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 04:04:04PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:57:10PM +0100, John Hedges wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:13:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > [...] > > > * debian/copyright does not list the actual copyright notice. See > > > http://lists.

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-08-16 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > There is a slight complication: the QA team uploaded a version that > fixed some arch bugs by setting architecture to all [1]. I don't seem to > be able to get the latest sources [...] 0.9.5.2-5 is available on every mirror, e.g. http://

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-08-16 Thread John Hedges
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 04:04:04PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:57:10PM +0100, John Hedges wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:13:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > [...] > > > * debian/copyright does not list the actual copyright notice. See > > > http://lists.

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-07-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:57:10PM +0100, John Hedges wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:13:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > * debian/copyright does not list the actual copyright notice. See > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg7.html [...] > Thanks for

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-07-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:57:10PM +0100, John Hedges wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:13:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > * debian/copyright does not list the actual copyright notice. See > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg7.html [...] > Thanks for

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-07-09 Thread John Hedges
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:13:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2004-07-09 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm a little better prepared now and have an orig.tar.gz, a .dsc and a > > .diff file uploaded to > > > http://www.callpoint.org/splay/ > [...] > > It is a little bit ro

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-07-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-07-09 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a little better prepared now and have an orig.tar.gz, a .dsc and a > .diff file uploaded to > http://www.callpoint.org/splay/ [...] It is a little bit rough around the edges: * Standards-Version: 3.5.10. Please check upgrading-checkl

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-07-09 Thread Christoph Wegscheider
John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried building a deb using pdebuild but although it ran fine the > resulting .deb was lost as pbuilder cleared away its stuff. You can set the directory to store the debs in the conffile, default is /var/cache/pbuilder/result. Christoph

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-07-09 Thread John Hedges
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:13:37PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2004-07-09 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm a little better prepared now and have an orig.tar.gz, a .dsc and a > > .diff file uploaded to > > > http://www.callpoint.org/splay/ > [...] > > It is a little bit ro

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-07-09 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-07-09 John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a little better prepared now and have an orig.tar.gz, a .dsc and a > .diff file uploaded to > http://www.callpoint.org/splay/ [...] It is a little bit rough around the edges: * Standards-Version: 3.5.10. Please check upgrading-checkl

RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-07-09 Thread John Hedges
I'm a little better prepared now and have an orig.tar.gz, a .dsc and a .diff file uploaded to http://www.callpoint.org/splay/ I have found the tools a little cumbersome so perhaps I am doing something wrong. Hopefully someone will be able to show me a better way. I tried building a deb using

Re: RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-07-09 Thread Christoph Wegscheider
John Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried building a deb using pdebuild but although it ran fine the > resulting .deb was lost as pbuilder cleared away its stuff. You can set the directory to store the debs in the conffile, default is /var/cache/pbuilder/result. Christoph -- To U

RFS: splay -- A bit better prepared now ...

2004-07-09 Thread John Hedges
I'm a little better prepared now and have an orig.tar.gz, a .dsc and a .diff file uploaded to http://www.callpoint.org/splay/ I have found the tools a little cumbersome so perhaps I am doing something wrong. Hopefully someone will be able to show me a better way. I tried building a deb using