Hello,
I searching an sponsor for the setserial package.
* Package name: setserial
Version: 2.17
* License: GPL
Description: Controls configuration of serial ports
Set and/or report the configuration information associated with
a serial port. This information includes what
Hello,
I searching an sponsor for the setserial package.
* Package name : setserial
Version : 2.17
* License : GPL
Description : Controls configuration of serial ports
Set and/or report the configuration information associated with
a serial port. This information includes
On 11 Mar 2005, at 08:29, Jan Zizka wrote:
BTW at least when I have re-duploaded those corrections to
mentors.debian.net
the package was updated just fine even thow the revision didn't change.
I would actually expect what you have described but seems that it's not
like that.
Mentors uses the simpl
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 12:50:45AM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Jan Zizka wrote on 11/03/2005 00:41:
> >BTW was I supposed to increase the version number to something
> >like 2.17-41.1 if previous package would have been put to official
> >archive?
>
> More like 2.17-42 I would say, but yes. Thou
Jan Zizka wrote on 11/03/2005 00:41:
BTW was I supposed to increase the version number to something
like 2.17-41.1 if previous package would have been put to official
archive?
More like 2.17-42 I would say, but yes. Though I'm no DD myself, the way
I understood the tools, you can't upload the sam
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:30:35AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:44:41PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
> > setserial (2.17-41) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> > * Closes: #276667: Czech translation of setserial debconf messages
> > Already fixed in 2.17-40, just closin
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 10:44:41PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
> setserial (2.17-41) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Closes: #276667: Czech translation of setserial debconf messages
> Already fixed in 2.17-40, just closing bug report.
Don't do this. If it isn't fixed in the changes described by th
Hi,
I would like to adopt existing setserial Debian package.
Could somebody check my new release of the package and sponsor it?
setserial
-
Controls configuration of serial ports.
Set and/or report the configuration information associated with
a serial port. This information includes wh
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:09:34PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
> > Procedure is mentioned at WNPP pages. And there is some bugreport against
> > setserial. Wishlist with updated translation, but it's still bugreport ;)
>
> Yes but that is already added in 2.17-40.
So I see no reason for keeping this
Hello
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:09:34PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
*CUT*
> Yes but that is already added in 2.17-40.
>
> > So the correct way of adopting would be to prepare new revision of package
> > with fixed bug and changelog entry which will close RFA.
>
> Yes but for this I would have to be
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:45:07PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > > 1) description of package
> >
> > I thought that this is already debian package that I don't have
> > to repeat the same info, but here is link with description:
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/stable/base/set
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:49:45PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
> > > However I'm not a DD so I would need a sponsor.
> > > Would there be anyone willing to help me?
> >
> > Request for sponsor for some package should contain:
> >
> > 1) description of package
>
> I thought that this is already debia
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:43:06PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:03:59PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
> > I would like to takeover the maintanence of setserial
> > package since it's current maintainer if looking for
> > a replacement.
> >
> > http://bugs.debi
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:03:59PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
> I would like to takeover the maintanence of setserial
> package since it's current maintainer if looking for
> a replacement.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=285355
>
> However I'm not a DD so I would need a sponsor
Hi,
I would like to takeover the maintanence of setserial
package since it's current maintainer if looking for
a replacement.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=285355
However I'm not a DD so I would need a sponsor.
Would there be anyone willing to help me?
Regards
Ziza
James Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Greetings,
> I request a sponsor for the setserial package.
>
> I use this package regularly and would like to see it well maintained.
>
> This will close out bug# 285355.
And what is with the ohter bugs which Ola would fix in next upload?
#276667
#287646
#27
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:31:06PM -0500, James Richardson wrote:
> Greetings,
> I request a sponsor for the setserial package.
>
> I use this package regularly and would like to see it well maintained.
>
> This will close out bug# 285355.
Great... but the usual way to find sponsors is to includ
hi,
* James Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-03 23:24]:
> Greetings,
> I request a sponsor for the setserial package.
>
> I use this package regularly and would like to see it well maintained.
me too.
please sponsor it!
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF
Greetings,
I request a sponsor for the setserial package.
I use this package regularly and would like to see it well maintained.
This will close out bug# 285355.
--
jr
19 matches
Mail list logo
