Your message dated Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:27:34 + (UTC)
with message-id <1373862919.5617383.1452551254294.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#810536: RFS: roxterm/3.3.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #810536,
regarding RFS: roxterm/3.3.2-1
to be marked as done.
This
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.3.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
On 08/12/15 14:05, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:59:56PM +, Tony Houghton wrote:
I must remember to change the level in my lintian options as well as fixing
I believe (because I have a pbuilder hook that runs lintian for me, I
rarely run it manyally) just dumping the fol
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:59:56PM +, Tony Houghton wrote:
> I must remember to change the level in my lintian options as well as fixing
I believe (because I have a pbuilder hook that runs lintian for me, I
rarely run it manyally) just dumping the following in ~/.lintianrc is
enough:
info=yes
Your message dated Tue, 8 Dec 2015 01:39:17 +
with message-id <20151208013917.ge12...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#806898: RFS: roxterm/3.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #806898,
regarding RFS: roxterm/3.3.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License
Your message dated Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:40:41 + (UTC)
with message-id <313329113.7549119.1446140441957.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#803395: RFS: roxterm/3.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #803395,
regarding RFS: roxterm/3.2.1-1
to be marked as done.
This
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Vicent and/or other potential sponsors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:56:46 + (UTC)
with message-id <1026269920.8555119.1440104206018.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#796261: RFS: roxterm/3.1.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #796261,
regarding RFS: roxterm/3.1.5-1
to be marked as done.
This
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Vicent and/or other potential sponsors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm
Your message dated Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:44:24 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: #795298 RFS: roxterm/3.1.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #795298,
regarding RFS: roxterm/3.1.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi Vincent,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 12 août 2015 20:16 +0100, Tony Houghton :
>
>>> Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
>>> file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
>>> it upstream.
>>
>> OK, 3
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> On 12/08/15 19:39, Tony Houghton wrote:
>>
>> Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
>> file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need
❦ 12 août 2015 20:16 +0100, Tony Houghton :
>> Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
>> file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
>> it upstream.
>
> OK, 3.1.4-1 is ready now. The dget command is now:
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.d
Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
it upstream.
On 12/08/15 19:39, Tony Houghton wrote:
Oops, please wait until I change it to 3.1.4-1. I overlooked the appdata
file in #795217. It contains some outdated content so I need to change
it upstream.
OK, 3.1.4-1 is ready now. The dget command is now:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.1.3-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2+
Sectio
Hi Tony,
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got emails saying that roxterm 3.0.1-1 and then 3.0.2-1 were uploaded and
> the RFS bugs closed (the latter on 13 July), but the latest version showing
> up in the archives is still 2.9.5-1. Has something gone wrong with th
Hi,
I got emails saying that roxterm 3.0.1-1 and then 3.0.2-1 were uploaded
and the RFS bugs closed (the latter on 13 July), but the latest version
showing up in the archives is still 2.9.5-1. Has something gone wrong
with the upload?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:19:41 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#792200: RFS: roxterm/3.0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #792200,
regarding RFS: roxterm/3.0.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
By Murphy's Law (or is it Sod's Law) I found quite a serious bug in
roxterm a day or two after the last release, so I've uploaded a new
version which needs sponsoring. TIA.
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.0.2-1
Your message dated Fri, 10 Jul 2015 01:16:46 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #790816,
regarding RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On 08/07/15 07:09, Vincent Cheng wrote:
NameError: name 'reload' is not defined
debian/rules:48: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_clean' failed
Oh, I didn't notice reload was python 2 only. And setdefaultencoding
doesn't work any more in python 3 anyway.
However, I was able to build you
Hi Tony,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> On 07/07/15 09:21, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>
>> UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position
>> 836: ordinal not in range(128)
>>
>> debian/rules:36: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed
>>
>> I've a
On 07/07/15 09:21, Vincent Cheng wrote:
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position
836: ordinal not in range(128)
debian/rules:36: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed
I've attached the full build log.
I think the problem is that the PC you tried the bu
On 04/07/15 22:29, Vincent Cheng wrote:
(If you have time, please upload an updated package to mentors so it's
easier to discuss any further changes.)
I've done that, hopefully it will be available by the time you read
this. The Breaks/Replaces I've decided on are as follows:
Package: roxterm
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> One other point I noticed is that currently I have roxterm-data Breaks
> and Replaces roxterm << 3.0.0-1 (actually I put 2 instead of 3 by
> mistake so that needs changing anyway), where roxterm << 3 is the old
> virtual package. As there is
On 04/07/15 10:19, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
My thinking is that anybody still using roxterm-gtk2 has some good
reason to do so and will not want to upgrade to a GTK3 version even if
it means missing out on the latest features and bug fixes; they
* Tony Houghton , 2015-07-03, 16:30:
The way I get the parallel option looks quite nasty too, is there a
better way to do that?
The code currently reads:
ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
NUMJOBS = $(patsubst parallel=%,%,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
CONFIGURE_CO
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
>> - d/rules: CFLAGS = $(shell dpkg-buildflags | grep '^CFLAGS=') is
>> quite brittle; I suggest using dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS instead
>> (ditto for CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS)
>
>
> That's better, I don't know how I missed that, unless it's a r
On 02/07/15 21:09, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
I thought I had released 2.9.6-1 and 2.9.7-1 via sponsorship too, but
for some reason the current version in unstable is still 2.9.5-1. Is the
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
>
> * Package name: roxterm
>Version : 3.0.1-
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 3.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2+
Sectio
Your message dated Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:47:08 +0100
with message-id <20141130144708.gy7...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#771361: RFS: roxterm/2.9.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #771361,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.9.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
On 29/11/2014 00:18, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:35:02 +, Tony Houghton wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". I have also posted an
unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two "bugs"?
Please add the requested information (i.e. a debdi
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:35:02 +, Tony Houghton wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". I have also posted an
> unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two "bugs"?
Please add the requested information (i.e. a debdiff of the .dsc
files) to #771358. It would m
Hi Tony,
On 28/11/14 19:35, Tony Houghton wrote:
> I have also posted an unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these
> two "bugs"?
Keep the sponsorship and unblock requests separate as they are two
separate items, handled by different people.
Regards
Daniel
signature.asc
Descript
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm". I have also posted
an unblock request which is #771358. Should I merge these two "bugs"?
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.9.5-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
Your message dated Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:27:15 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#762011: RFS: roxterm/2.9.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #762011,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.9.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.9.4-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+, LGPL-3+
* Se
Your message dated Sat, 9 Aug 2014 00:51:07 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#756634: RFS: roxterm/2.9.3-1 (was 2.9.1-1)
has caused the Debian Bug report #756634,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.9.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.3-1
thanks
On 08/08/14 09:48, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
Except that wasn't working for me, it said it was incompatible with source
format 3.0 (Quilt) (see above). Or was it specifically my regex or synta
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> On 07/08/14 09:27, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
>>>
>>> retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.2-1
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> I think I've m
On 07/08/14 09:27, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.2-1
thanks
I think I've managed to fix the build now so that the debian package can be
built repeatedly. Most of the changes are upstream so there is a new
ve
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.2-1
> thanks
>
> I think I've managed to fix the build now so that the debian package can be
> built repeatedly. Most of the changes are upstream so there is a new
> version. Please use
retitle 756634 RFS: roxterm/2.9.2-1
thanks
I think I've managed to fix the build now so that the debian package can
be built repeatedly. Most of the changes are upstream so there is a new
version. Please use the new link:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_2.
On 04/08/14 21:58, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota
wrote:
- Allow the content modification of the po/roxterm.pot. To make it,
create the file debian/sourc
Hi Vicent! Your package!
I am glad to shared this moment with you.
Cheers,
Eriberto
2014-08-04 17:58 GMT-03:00 Vincent Cheng :
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
>> On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota
>> wrote:
>>
>>> - Allow the content modification of the po/roxterm.pot. To make it,
>>> create the file debian/source/options with this conten
On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
- Allow the content modification of the po/roxterm.pot. To make it,
create the file debian/source/options with this content[1]:
extend-diff-ignore = "^po/roxterm.pot$"
I did that, but I get th
Hi Tony,
You must:
1. Edit the debian/compat file.
2. Edit the debian/control and make 'Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9)'.
Thanks!
Eriberto
2014-08-04 11:09 GMT-03:00 Tony Houghton :
> On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota
>> wrote:
>>>
Thanks Vincent!
2014-08-04 3:11 GMT-03:00 Vincent Cheng :
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
>> tags 756634 moreinfo
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> Please:
>>
>> 1. Update DH from 7 to 9.
>>
>> 2. Your package doesn't builds twice. To fix it:
>>
>> - As upstream, remove
On 04/08/14 07:11, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
1. Update DH from 7 to 9.
Thanks for the feedback. I'm not quite sure what that bit means though.
Do I just need to update Build-Depends to debhelper (>= 9)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> tags 756634 moreinfo
> thanks
>
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> Please:
>
> 1. Update DH from 7 to 9.
>
> 2. Your package doesn't builds twice. To fix it:
>
> - As upstream, remove all po/*.mo when running make clean (or similar).
> - Idem for these di
tags 756634 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Tony,
Please:
1. Update DH from 7 to 9.
2. Your package doesn't builds twice. To fix it:
- As upstream, remove all po/*.mo when running make clean (or similar).
- Idem for these directories: Help/{es,fr,pt_BR,ru,uk} and
roxterm-config.1.xml, roxterm.1.xml, r
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.9.1-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourc
Your message dated Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:05:39 -0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#739089: Subject: RFS: roxterm/2.8.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #739089,
regarding Subject: RFS: roxterm/2.8.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.8.2-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL
Thanks for sponsoring it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140118142157.427e1...@realh.co.uk
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jan 2014 00:54:06 -0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: roxterm/2.8.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #735598,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.8.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
* Version : 2.8.1-1
* Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+
* Section
Your message dated Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:48:06 +0200
with message-id <20130603144806.6f26edcc@ileemo>
and subject line Re: Bug#710835: RFS: roxterm/2.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #710835,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.7.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Hello,
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:53:20 +0100
Tony Houghton wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "roxterm"
Uploaded, thanks a lot!
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 18:09:46 -0300
Eriberto wrote:
> Hey! Your package has lintian warnings. Please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
>
> You must add a message about transition from experimental to unstable
> in debian/changelog. I suggest: "Uploaded to unstable", because
> lintian will search by "to u
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 18:09:46 -0300
Eriberto wrote:
> Hey! Your package has lintian warnings. Please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
>
> You must add a message about transition from experimental to unstable
> in debian/changelog. I suggest: "Uploaded to unstable", because
> lintian will search by "to u
Hey! Your package has lintian warnings. Please, see http://bit.ly/lintian
You must add a message about transition from experimental to unstable
in debian/changelog. I suggest: "Uploaded to unstable", because
lintian will search by "to unstable" in changelog.
I hope this help.
Regards,
Eriberto
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2+
Your message dated Wed, 3 Apr 2013 01:39:45 +0200
with message-id <20130403013945.103b656f@ileemo>
and subject line Re: Bug#704494: RFS: roxterm/2.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #704494,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.7.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.7.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2+
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 18:48:50 -0700
with message-id <20120630014850.gh5...@ofb.net>
and subject line Uploads: libcdaudio, sgml-data, roxterm
has caused the Debian Bug report #678552,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.6.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Pinging this. I guess it may already be too late to avoid some of the
extra work needed to get it into testing after the freeze though :-(.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:59:27 +0100
Tony Houghton wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponso
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.6.5-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
License : GPL2+
Section
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 04:14:14 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: roxterm/2.6.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #674961,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.6.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.6.4-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2+
Section
Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2012 15:28:50 +
with message-id <20120512152850.gb7...@master.debian.org>
and subject line closing sponsorship-requests for packages uploaded to unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #671651,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.6.3-1
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Wed, 09 May 2012 23:36:50 +0200
with message-id <1336599410.9704.50.camel@LAPJFS>
and subject line Re: RFS: roxterm/2.5.2-1 uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #661389,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.5.2-1 -- Multi-tabbed GTK+/VTE terminal emulator
to be marked as done.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.6.3-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL2+
Section
Your message dated Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:05:23 +0800
with message-id <87obqjtirg@isil.kanru.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#669401: RFS: roxterm/2.6.2-1 (was 2.6.1-1)
has caused the Debian Bug report #669401,
regarding RFS: roxterm/2.6.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Uploaded.
Thanks for your contribution!
Kanru
Tony Houghton writes:
> retitle 669401 RFS: roxterm/2.6.2-1
> thanks
>
> The Ubuntu PPA builder for lucid uncovered a backwards compatibility bug
> so I've updated upstream and replaced the package so that uscan won't
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 669401 RFS: roxterm/2.6.2-1
Bug #669401 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: roxterm/2.6.1-1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: roxterm/2.6.2-1' from 'RFS: roxterm/2.6.1-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
retitle 669401 RFS: roxterm/2.6.2-1
thanks
The Ubuntu PPA builder for lucid uncovered a backwards compatibility bug
so I've updated upstream and replaced the package so that uscan won't
complain about its not being the latest upstream.
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
URL : http://roxterm.source
The latest version of this package is now 2.5.3-1:
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.5.3-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+, LGPL-3+
Section : x11
It builds these binary packages:
roxt
Hi!
Tony Houghton writes:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:11:30 +
> Tony Houghton wrote:
>
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
>>
>> * Package name: roxterm
>>Version : 2.5.2-1
>
> It
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:11:30 +
Tony Houghton wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
>
> * Package name: roxterm
>Version : 2.5.2-1
It's been almost 2 weeks since this RFS. Is ther
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.5.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+, LGPL-3+
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:52:58 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Unfortunately there is still one missing build-dep: librsvg2-bin. I
> have uploaded 2.4.2-1 with this fixed, please fix it in your
> repository as well :)
OK, I've corrected that my end too. Thanks a lot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Hi!
Tony Houghton writes:
> Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza, so
> please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead.
Unfortunately there is still one missing build-dep: librsvg2-bin. I have
uploaded 2.4.2-1 with this fixed, please fix it in your reposito
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:12:41 +0100
Tobias Frost wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2012, 13:30 + schrieb Tony Houghton:
>
> > The debian packaging and upstream are in one repository and I didn't
> > want the contents of the release tarball to be inconsistent with
> > what's in the package. I
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:12:41 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> I was told that the VCS cotnrol fields are not meant for "upstream" but
> only to point to servers on the debian infrasturcture to contain the
> packaging stuff.
s/on the debian infrasturcture//
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors
Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2012, 13:30 + schrieb Tony Houghton:
> The debian packaging and upstream are in one repository and I didn't
> want the contents of the release tarball to be inconsistent with what's
> in the package. I would also have to change the way I use git tags to
> generate a ve
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:16:15 +0800
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 01:33 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> > Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza,
> > so please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead.
> >
> If that's an issue in the packaging, why did you
On 01/05/2012 01:33 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza, so
> please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead.
>
If that's an issue in the packaging, why did you need to upgrade from
2.4.1 to 2.4.2, and why didn't you just do a 2.
Unfortunately I just discovered a bug in the Build-Depends stanza, so
please ignore version 2.4.1-1 and upload 2.4.2-1 instead.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.4.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : h
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2+
Section : x11
It builds those binary packag
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 23:37:04 +0800
Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Tony Houghton writes:
>
> >> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
>
> Done.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Tony Houghton writes:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:26:51 +0100
> Tony Houghton wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:59:04 +0100
>> Tony Houghton wrote:
>>
>> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
>> >
>> > * Package name: roxterm
>> >Version : 2.2.1-1
>>
>> Hold tha
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 00:26:51 +0100
Tony Houghton wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:59:04 +0100
> Tony Houghton wrote:
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm".
> >
> > * Package name: roxterm
> >Version : 2.2.1-1
>
> Hold that, I discovered corruption in the GtkB
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
