Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Please. Pretty please with sugar on top. Use “list-reply” and stop sending mail copies unless someone asks for it. On 20/01/2008, Moe Smith wrote: > Hmm, okay, where would I fetch the deb? > I'm actually running etch (pinned) but with lenny and unstable in my > sources.list. "apt-get install -t un

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Moe Smith
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 21:20 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 20/01/2008, Moe Smith wrote: > > I just uploaded a fixed version 1.0-6, my lintian (from lenny) doesn't > > complain about that one anymore. Please let me know if there are still > > problems. > > Please always use the latest one. Sin

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Moe, * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 21:06]: > On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 20:13 +0100, David Bremner wrote: [...] > Anyways, what is the general debian policy about one trick ponies? There is no real policy for this but people don't like the overhead of a package for simple stuff they

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Moe Smith
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 20:00 +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi Moe, > * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 17:40]: > [...] > > It builds these binary packages: > > rafb - Reads text from stdin and posts it to the pastebin at rafb.net > > Why should someone want rafb.net if there is > pa

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Moe Smith
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 20:10 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > Il giorno Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:00:43 +0100 > Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > > Hi Moe, > > * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 17:40]: > > [...] > > > It builds these binary packages: > > > rafb - Reads text fro

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 20/01/2008, Moe Smith wrote: > I just uploaded a fixed version 1.0-6, my lintian (from lenny) doesn't > complain about that one anymore. Please let me know if there are still > problems. Please always use the latest one. Since it's a Perl-based package, it shouldn't cause any problem to fetch t

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Moe Smith
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 20:13 +0100, David Bremner wrote: > Hi Moe; > > Your package seems to be native, and has lintian warnings (with the > latest lintian in sid). Sorry, my bad. I just uploaded a fixed version 1.0-6, my lintian (from lenny) doesn't complain about that one anymore. Please let me

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread David Bremner
Hi Moe; Your package seems to be native, and has lintian warnings (with the latest lintian in sid). At the risk of the pot calling the kettle black (see wdg-offline-validator), I think you also need to sell people a bit on why a 100 line perl script needs its own package. best, David -- To

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread David Paleino
Il giorno Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:00:43 +0100 Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi Moe, > * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 17:40]: > [...] > > It builds these binary packages: > > rafb - Reads text from stdin and posts it to the pastebin at rafb.net > > Why should someone

Re: RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Moe, * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 17:40]: [...] > It builds these binary packages: > rafb - Reads text from stdin and posts it to the pastebin at rafb.net Why should someone want rafb.net if there is paste.debian.net? ;-P Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [

RFS: rafb

2008-01-20 Thread Moe Smith
Subject: RFS: rafb Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rafb". * Package name: rafb Version : 1.0-4 Upstream Author : Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : Sorry, none yet * License : BSD Section : web It bui