Re: RFS: pyxplot -- command-line plotting package producing publication-quality output

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 20:10 +, Sam Morris wrote: > Upstream's build system is a bit esoteric. Rather than come up with a > complicated clean rule I thought it would be easier to use the tarball-in- > a-tarball method. I'm not sure that means you should just ship the tarball. I just tried set

Re: RFS: pyxplot -- command-line plotting package producing publication-quality output

On Wed, 16 May 2007 20:54:44 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 20:50 +0100, Sam Morris wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyxplot". > > Just one thing I found: > > * debian/README should be debian/README.Debian. Thanks! > Although I'm really clueless to why you

Re: RFS: pyxplot -- command-line plotting package producing publication-quality output

> Although I'm really clueless to why you're shipping the tarball, and > extracting it upon installing? Am I missing something? and even more I wonder why there's the PyX tarball shipped within that tarball. -- Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To

Re: RFS: pyxplot -- command-line plotting package producing publication-quality output

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 20:50 +0100, Sam Morris wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyxplot". Just one thing I found: * debian/README should be debian/README.Debian. Although I'm really clueless to why you're shipping the tarball, and extracting it upon installing? Am I missing so

RFS: pyxplot -- command-line plotting package producing publication-quality output

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyxplot". Package name: pyxplot Version : 0.6.3-1 Upstream Author : Dominic Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://www.pyxplot.org.uk/ License : GPLv2 or later Section : math PyXPlot is a