Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-02 Thread Daniel Baumann
Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Ah, this makes much more sense :) Thanks for hint, applied and > uploaded to > http://dottedmag.net/debian/python-pytils/python-pytils_0.2.0-1.dsc good, uploaded. if you want/need further sponsoring, contact me off-list: http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/sponsori

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 23:31:50 01.01.2007 UTC+01 when Daniel Baumann did gyre and gimble: DB> This change simplifies the rules file, makes the build a bit DB> faster, and does not have any influence on the binary packages. Ah, this makes much more sense :) Thanks for hint, applied and uploaded to h

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Daniel Baumann
Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > After some thinking I pasted normal GPL blurb, just without years in > '(C) line'. good. > Updated package is at > http://dottedmag.net/debian/python-pytils/python-pytils_0.2.0-1.dsc except from the suggestion to simplify the rules file in the other mail, the package is

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Daniel Baumann
Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > This eleminates .pyc's in the destdir, but does not eleminate .pyc's > created in pytils/ which are created as a side-effect of importing > pytils in the setup.py itself. Just compare: [...] I think we have a missunderstanding here, I'm speaking of this: ---snip--- @@ -3

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 17:02:02 01.01.2007 UTC+01 when Daniel Baumann did gyre and gimble: DB> e.g. here, it is necessary that you list the sources as GPL2 DB> licensed, but you can use the normal gpl blurb for that, and not DB> require the 'custom' gpl blurb from upstream. they are saying the DB>

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 17:02:02 01.01.2007 UTC+01 when Daniel Baumann did gyre and gimble: DB> i don't understand why you have to wait for upstream, *how* you DB> write things in debian/copyright is not determined by upstream, DB> only *what* you write. Normal GPL blurb includes copyright years, wh

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Daniel Baumann
Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > DB> include also the full gpl blurb. > > Will do when author releases 0.2.1 with copyright years added to the > source files. i don't understand why you have to wait for upstream, *how* you write things in debian/copyright is not determined by upstream, only *what* you w

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 14:32:00 01.01.2007 UTC+01 when Daniel Baumann did gyre and gimble: DB> * should: please use the common format for the copyright file, DB> look at e.g. libextractor if unsure. fixed. DB> include also the full gpl blurb. Will do when author releases 0.2.1 with copyright year

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Daniel Baumann
Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Ugh, my fault. I just provided copyright year of my debian > work. Anyway I contacted the author and he promised to fix copyright > statements in source code (add copyright years, use standard GPL > header as FSF wants) in the next minor version, so I will postpone > packag

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 16:01:32 01.01.2007 UTC+01 when Nico Golde did gyre and gimble: NG> I would suggest to rework the copyright it looks a bit=20 strange NG> even if all needed information is included. What about the NG> copyright year, the upstream files are from=20 October 2006 but NG> Copyrig

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-01 14:13]: [...] > The upload would fix the bug 405175 > > The package can be found here: > - URL: http://dottedmag.net/debian/python-pytils/ > - dget http://dottedmag.net/debian/python-pytils/python-pytils_0.2.0-1.dsc I would suggest to rework

Re: RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Daniel Baumann
Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > http://dottedmag.net/debian/python-pytils/python-pytils_0.2.0-1.dsc * should: please use the common format for the copyright file, look at e.g. libextractor if unsure. include also the full gpl blurb. * must: your package is arch all, hence you should have all the

RFS: python-pytils

2007-01-01 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-pytils". * Package name: pytils Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Pythy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://gorod-omsk.ru/blog/pythy/projects/pytils/ * License : GPL Section : pyhton It builds single