George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ops, sorry bad row counting. I meant that
> $expected_name =~ s/([0-9])\.so\./$1-/; won't cope with well with name.so.1
It will indeed not match name.so.1 at all, which is intentional. :)
This implements the rule in library naming that says that a l
2008/6/9 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Uploaded. That will hang in NEW for a while. Thanks for your work and
> patience.
Thank you for sponsoring it!
Regards,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.burghardt.pl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Monday 09 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Actually it would be smarter do ship only the detached debugging symbols
> > I believe. I can't think of a use case where the debugging version of
> > the shared library would be desperately needed or prefe
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually it would be smarter do ship only the detached debugging symbols
> I believe. I can't think of a use case where the debugging version of
> the shared library would be desperately needed or preferred, or I'm
> wrong ?
Well, usually the reason wh
On Monday 09 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> 2008/6/8 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So I believe that the version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1 you have uploaded to mentors
> > on 07-Jun-2008 22:00 (ah I hate dealing with rewritten changelog
> > history;-) is basically ok, except that lintian ove
On Monday 09 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > shared library goes in /usr/lib and as expected lintian complains with:
> > libpocoxml5-dbg: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libPocoXMLd5
> > because of the missing 'd' before '5', at least, hence that le
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> shared library goes in /usr/lib and as expected lintian complains with:
> libpocoxml5-dbg: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libPocoXMLd5
> because of the missing 'd' before '5', at least, hence that leads us to a
> package name as `libpocoxmld5-dbg',
2008/6/8 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So I believe that the version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1 you have uploaded to mentors on
> 07-Jun-2008 22:00 (ah I hate dealing with rewritten changelog history;-) is
> basically ok, except that lintian override files should be installed for all
> these -dbg packag
On Sunday 08 June 2008, George Danchev wrote:
> On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> > Hello George,
Hi Krzysztof,
--cut--
> So, as libpkg-guide suggests in table 5.1 (soname: libfoo.so.4 => pkgname:
> libfoo4) and lintian asks us to end in -dbg since we install
> in /usr/lib/de
On Sunday 08 June 2008, George Danchev wrote:
--cut--
> Yes, dh_strip -k was called to split debigging symbols in a separate file
> (containing the detached debugging symbols) in usr/lib/debug/, in order to
> avoid binary duplications with things we want debugable, but the above
> oneliner produces
On Sunday 08 June 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> >> This looks reasonable, but trigger another lintian warrning:
> >>
> >> N: Processing binary package libpocoxml5-dbg (version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1) ...
> >>
George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
>> This looks reasonable, but trigger another lintian warrning:
>>
>> N: Processing binary package libpocoxml5-dbg (version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1) ...
>> W: libpocoxml5-dbg: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> Hello George,
>
> 2008/6/7 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >As a user of that package, I'm still reluctant to ship it in a
> > shape where lintian is not happy enough. I've read your reasoning about
> > debug package names you hav
Hello George,
2008/6/7 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>As a user of that package, I'm still reluctant to ship it in a shape
> where
> lintian is not happy enough. I've read your reasoning about debug package
> names you have choosen, but I still don't see a good reason not to have
>
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> 2008/6/6 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 06 juin 2008, vers 00:26,
> >
> > "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco/poco_1.3.
On Friday 06 June 2008, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 06 juin 2008, vers 00:26,
>
> "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> >> As Cyril stated in another post, you must (by policy) put this
> >> information in debian/copyright. Sorry
2008/6/6 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 06 juin 2008, vers 00:26,
> "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco/poco_1.3.2+dfsg1-1.dsc
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poc
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 06 juin 2008, vers 00:26,
"Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> As Cyril stated in another post, you must (by policy) put this
>> information in debian/copyright. Sorry to have hinted an outdated
>> information (some t
2008/6/4 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As Cyril stated in another post, you must (by policy) put this
> information in debian/copyright. Sorry to have hinted an outdated
> information (some translations are not up-to-date, look at the english
> version of the policy).
Do
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mardi 03 juin 2008, vers 00:16, "Krzysztof
Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> 2008/5/22 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I did not check if it is a requirement, but debug version of library are
>> usually suffixed by "-dbg". For example libpocoxml5-dbg.
On 02/06/2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> > Since you are removing non-free stuff from orig tarball, you
> > should either explain in README.Debian-source how to get the dfsg
> > tarball from the orig tarball or add a get-orig-source in
> > debian/rules.
>
> README.Debian-source added. Cha
2008/5/22 Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I did not check if it is a requirement, but debug version of library are
> usually suffixed by "-dbg". For example libpocoxml5-dbg. Is there any
> difference between the debug and non debug versions apart from stripped
> symbols? If there is no
OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers
15:51, "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> It builds these binary packages:
> libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
> libpocodata5 - The C++ Portable Components Data library
>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpocodata5 - The C++ Portable Components Data library
libpocodatad5 - The C++ Portable Compon
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpocodata5 - The C++ Portable Components Data library
libpocodatad5 - The C++ Portable Compon
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpocodata5 - The C++ Portable Components Data library
libpocodatad5 - The C++ Portable Compon
26 matches
Mail list logo
