Re: RFS: poco (updated package) [4th try]

2008-01-21 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
2008/1/20, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I believe that you should either license your packaging work under the > same license as the upstream source or add an exception to the licensing > on your packaging work to allow it to be linked with OpenSSL. I think simple patches are not eligible f

Re: RFS: poco (updated package) [4th try]

2008-01-19 Thread Russ Allbery
"Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2008/1/19, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:38:39AM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: >> >The package appears to be lintian clean. >> >> lintian -i --show-overrides poco_1.2.9-3_i386.changes >> W: libpoco2

Re: RFS: poco (updated package) [4th try]

2008-01-19 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:38:39AM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: >The package appears to be lintian clean. lintian -i --show-overrides poco_1.2.9-3_i386.changes W: libpoco2: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl N: N: This package appears to be covered by the GNU GPL but depends on the N:

Re: RFS: poco (updated package) [4th try]

2008-01-19 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
2008/1/19, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:38:39AM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote: > >The package appears to be lintian clean. > > lintian -i --show-overrides poco_1.2.9-3_i386.changes > W: libpoco2: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl > N: > N: This

RFS: poco (updated package) [4th try]

2008-01-19 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3 of my package "poco". It builds these binary packages: libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload