Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6p2-1
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpococrypto9 - The C++ Portable Components Crypto library
libpococrypto9-dbg - The C++ Portable Co
Hi,
Hi Günter
can you please respond a short statement about API and ABI stability
of poco.
- Patrick
we generally try very hard to maintain API (source-code level)
compatibility between releases, especially in the core libraries
(Foundation, XML, Util, Net).
ABI (binary) compatibil
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes:
> George Danchev:
> > > I also uploaded a new upstream version 1.3.6p1.
> >
> > Uploaded with the last two changelog entries of yours included.
>
> Can you please upload poco-doc too. Thanks!
Sure, thanks for the poke. Uploaded with the following change: I moved y
George Danchev:
> > I also uploaded a new upstream version 1.3.6p1.
>
> Uploaded with the last two changelog entries of yours included.
>
Can you please upload poco-doc too. Thanks!
- Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi Günter
can you please respond a short statement about API and ABI stability of poco.
- Patrick
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Betreff: Re: RFS: poco (updated package)
Datum: Samstag 26 Dezember 2009
Von: George Danchev
An: Patrick Roland Gansterer
Patrick Roland
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes:
> George Danchev:
> > I'm still waiting for an answer to this:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00300.html
>
> Do you think that a symbols file will be the correct solution? I didn't
> check the ABI history of poco, so i don't know if it is ba
2009/12/24 George Danchev :
> [...] Is the original
> maintainer (CC'ed) aware of you being a co-maintainer?
Yes, I am. We will maintain poco at alioth [1].
[1] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/poco.git
Regards,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt
http://www.burghardt.pl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
George Danchev:
> I'm still waiting for an answer to this:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00300.html
Do you think that a symbols file will be the correct solution? I didn't check
the ABI history of poco, so i don't know if it is backward compatible and if
this is a goal of up
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes:
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
I'm still waiting for an answer to this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/12/msg00300.html
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6-1
> of package "poco" and "poco-doc".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libpoco-
Patrick Roland Gansterer writes:
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
(I'm the usual sponsor of poco and poco-doc, and I'm looking for co-
sponsors;-)
Some preliminary comments follow:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6-1
> of package "poco" and "poco-doc".
>
> It builds these binary packag
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.6-1
of package "poco" and "poco-doc".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpococrypto9 - The C++ Portable Components Crypto library
libpococrypto9-dbg - The C++ P
> 2009/9/1 George Danchev :
> > This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Thanks.
>
> Thank you! Would you upload poco-doc too?
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco-doc/poco-doc_1.3.5-1.dsc
Also uploaded. Thanks for the heads-up!
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB
signature.a
2009/9/1 George Danchev :
> This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Thanks.
Thank you! Would you upload poco-doc too?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco-doc/poco-doc_1.3.5-1.dsc
Best regards,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt
http://www.burghardt.pl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Sunday 30 August 2009 20:37:13 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> 2009/8/30 George Danchev :
> > * it would be better to explicitly build-depends on zlib1g-dev
>
> Dependency add and new package uploaded to mentors.d.n.
This is now uploaded. No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. Thanks.
--
pub 4096R/0E
2009/8/30 George Danchev :
> * it would be better to explicitly build-depends on zlib1g-dev
Dependency add and new package uploaded to mentors.d.n.
Regards,
--
Krzysztof Burghardt
http://www.burghardt.pl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On Sunday 30 August 2009 16:41:26 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> 2009/5/27 George Danchev :
> > The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
> > libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix
> > that to dynamically link with the system provided libz, o
2009/5/27 George Danchev :
> The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
> libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix that
> to dynamically link with the system provided libz, or is there any reason I'm
> not aware of to use the zlib version prov
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> I'm not a Debian Developer but I've met this one with one of my
> "upstreams" as well. The reasoning is very vague. My upstream has been
> keeping an ancient copy of zlib in their tree/releases just because
> it's *easier* for them to buil
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> 2009/6/1 Krzysztof Burghardt :
>> 2009/5/31 Krzysztof Burghardt :
>>> 2009/5/27 George Danchev :
The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we plea
2009/6/1 Krzysztof Burghardt :
> 2009/5/31 Krzysztof Burghardt :
>> 2009/5/27 George Danchev :
>>> The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
>>> libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix that
>>> to dynamically link with the system provided li
2009/5/31 Krzysztof Burghardt :
> 2009/5/27 George Danchev :
>> The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
>> libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix that
>> to dynamically link with the system provided libz, or is there any reason I'm
>> not
2009/5/27 George Danchev :
> The only thing I'm not happy with is the staticaly linked zlib with
> libpocofoundaton shared object and its debug variant. Can we please fix that
> to dynamically link with the system provided libz, or is there any reason I'm
> not aware of to use the zlib version prov
On Sunday 24 May 2009 21:14:10 krzysz...@burghardt.pl wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco/poco_1.3.5-1.dsc
Looks good. I also checked buildability of clamfs with poco 1.3.5-1 (the only
package in the archive which build-depends on libpobo-dev).
The o
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.5-1
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpococrypto8 - The C++ Portable Components Crypto library
libpococrypto8-dbg - The C++ Portable Com
On Saturday 15 November 2008 13:16:07 Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3p1-2
> of my package "poco".
Package uploaded. Thanks for taking care of these bugs.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.3p1-2
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpococrypto6 - The C++ Portable Components Crypto library
libpococrypto6-dbg - The C++ Portable Co
On Friday 27 June 2008, George Danchev wrote:
> On Thursday 26 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
--cut--
> > I just realized that I forgot to add new patch to patches/00list, so
> > pacakge is still buggy. Version 1.3.2+dfsg1-3 has this missing line
> > add.
> >
> > http://mentors.debian.net/de
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> Hello George,
>
> 2008/6/25 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
> >> of my package "poco".
>
> [...]
>
> >> The upload w
Hello George,
2008/6/25 George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
>> of my package "poco".
[...]
>> The upload would fix these bugs: 487392, 487394, 487934
>
>An excellent bug
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
> of my package "poco".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
> libpocodata5 - The C
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-2
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpocodata5 - The C++ Portable Components Data library
libpocodata5-dbg - The C++ Portable Com
2008/1/20, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I believe that you should either license your packaging work under the
> same license as the upstream source or add an exception to the licensing
> on your packaging work to allow it to be linked with OpenSSL.
I think simple patches are not eligible f
"Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/1/19, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:38:39AM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
>> >The package appears to be lintian clean.
>>
>> lintian -i --show-overrides poco_1.2.9-3_i386.changes
>> W: libpoco2
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:38:39AM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
>The package appears to be lintian clean.
lintian -i --show-overrides poco_1.2.9-3_i386.changes
W: libpoco2: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
N:
N: This package appears to be covered by the GNU GPL but depends on the
N:
2008/1/19, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:38:39AM +0100, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
> >The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> lintian -i --show-overrides poco_1.2.9-3_i386.changes
> W: libpoco2: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl
> N:
> N: This
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.9-3
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpoco2 - POCO - The C++ Portable Components
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload
39 matches
Mail list logo
