Florian Ernst wrote:
> Well, IMHO it is. Just uploaded.
Thanks, your help is very much appreciated.
> If you want to update your packaging any time in the future please
> simply contact me directly via private mail.
Will do :)
Cheers,
Jack
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:10:58PM +0100, Jack Grahams wrote:
> Thanks again for your help. I've uploaded it to mentors.debian.net.
> Please let me know if it's suitable for sponsorship.
Well, IMHO it is. Just uploaded.
If you want to update your packaging any time in the future please
simply con
> ...so what I meant was: please take care that the CFLAGS from your previous
> debian/rules get passed on correctly.
Ugh. Of course. I knew I kept it in for a reason ;) Now I feel stupid...
I hope I've done this okay now.
> Both texts better shouldn't go into too much detail about how certain
>
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:42:56PM +0100, Jack Grahams wrote:
> > The CFLAGS are not passed to make, so setting -g effectively yields
> > no result as upstream uses his own set of flags.
>
> Good point, I hadn't noticed that - I thought I'd got rid of all the
> pointless parts of debian/rules...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Flo,
> The CFLAGS are not passed to make, so setting -g effectively yields
> no result as upstream uses his own set of flags.
Good point, I hadn't noticed that - I thought I'd got rid of all the
pointless parts of debian/rules...
> DH_COMPAT is s
Hello there,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Jack Grahams wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5 of my package "png2html"
> (This package was previously orphaned). I would like to thank those who have
> taken the time to look at this package and make suggestions fo
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5 of my package "png2html"
(This package was previously orphaned). I would like to thank those who have
taken the time to look at this package and make suggestions for improvements,
and I hope it is now ready for sponsorship.
It bui
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Regarding debian/patches/01_makefilefix.dpatch:
> Wouldn't it be easier if you installed the files into the appropriate
> locations using dh_install in debian/rules later? Patching the Makefile
> looks a bit unusual to me.
That is a much better method, thanks.
> s/pixer by
On Sunday 24 September 2006 02:33, Jack Grahams wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5
> of my package "png2html" (This package was previously orphaned).
Regarding debian/patches/01_makefilefix.dpatch:
Wouldn't it be easier if you installed the files into the appropriate
lo
Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> - Consider deleting all the obvious comments in debian/rules like:
> * # Build commands.
> * # Nothing to do.
> * and more.
> - debian/control
> * s/pixer/pixel
> - You can use this upload to close fixed in NMU bugs like #343915 :)
Thank you very
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:43:08 -0800
Jack Grahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jack,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5
> of my package "png2html". This package was previously orphaned.
I took a look to your package and it looks nice, i only caught the
following minor mista
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5
of my package "png2html". This package was previously orphaned.
It builds these binary packages:
png2html - transforms a PNG image to a web page
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 338971, 387477, 38
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5
of my package "png2html" (This package was previously orphaned).
It builds these binary packages:
png2html - transforms a PNG image to a web page
The package is lintian clean.
The
13 matches
Mail list logo
