Re: RFS: phing (Another try...)

Hi Alessio, I will check it theses days and let you know when I think it's ready. Thanks in advance Nicolas Le 11 janvier 2012 00:37, Alessio Treglia a écrit : > Hi Nicolas, > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Nicolas wrote: > > Hi Arno, > > > > many thanks for you report. I will update my

Re: RFS: phing (Another try...)

Hi Nicolas, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Nicolas wrote: > Hi Arno, > > many thanks for you report. I will update my packaging for theses cosmetics > changes as you said ! I'd have interest in having this package in Debian, please let me know when the package is ready for the review. Cheers

Re: RFS: phing (Another try...)

Hi Arno, many thanks for you report. I will update my packaging for theses cosmetics changes as you said ! Regards, Nicolas 2011/7/21 Arno Töll > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Nicolas, > > IANADD (twb told me, I shall be lazy!), here are some comments on your > package

Re: RFS: phing (Another try...)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nicolas, IANADD (twb told me, I shall be lazy!), here are some comments on your package: On 21.07.2011 09:13, Nicolas wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phing". * Please extend description of the -doc package. Its a bit too shor

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Le Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:28:26PM +0200, Benoît Knecht a écrit : > Kilian Krause wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > > Nicolas wrote: > > > > > Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same. > > > > > > Again, you must include the text of the license in a s

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi all, I splitted the package and created a phing-doc package that hold the documentation. Regards, Nicolas 2011/7/2 Arno Töll > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > On 02.07.2011 17:54, Nicolas wrote: > >> Another thing though; I just noticed that out of the 18MB of th

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 02.07.2011 17:54, Nicolas wrote: >> Another thing though; I just noticed that out of the 18MB of the >> unpacked .deb, 15MB are documentation. I would say it's definitely worth >> having a separate phing-doc package in this case. [..] >> > Good

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi, Le 2 juillet 2011 15:21, Benoît Knecht a écrit : > > It's in much better shape, yes. Thanks for taking our remarks in > consideration. > > I think, even if I made packages for more than one year, I a kind of newbie and any advices are helpful. I like improve my knowledge. > Another thing t

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi Nicolas, (BTW, please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list.) Nicolas wrote: > [...] > > I think it's ready for sponsor. I just have to find one. It's in much better shape, yes. Thanks for taking our remarks in consideration. Another thing though; I just noticed that out of the 18MB of th

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi, Le 2 juillet 2011 14:10, Benoît Knecht a écrit : > Nicolas wrote: > > I think and I hope that time it's ok : > > - I add description for expat and apache license > > That's much better. I don't think you should have "Copyright (c) 1998, > 1999, 2000 Thai Open Source Software Center Ltd" in

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Benoît, On 02.07.2011 14:10, Benoît Knecht wrote: >> - I remove email for bug. > > I'm happy with that change, but maybe Arno disagrees ;) I'm fine with that. I was just disagreeing with you, denoting upstream's preferred way to report bugs shoul

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Nicolas wrote: > I think and I hope that time it's ok : > - I add description for expat and apache license That's much better. I don't think you should have "Copyright (c) 1998, 1999, 2000 Thai Open Source Software Center Ltd" in the Expat license text though, that would belong to the 'Copyright:'

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi all, I think and I hope that time it's ok : - I add description for expat and apache license - I add a special stanza and only one for LGPL-3 license - I remove email for bug. All changes push to mentors and git repository. Regards, Nicolas Le 2 juillet 2011 12:28, Benoît Knecht a écrit :

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi Kilian, Kilian Krause wrote: > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > Nicolas wrote: > > > > Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same. > > > > Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone License > > paragraph. > > actually you may be interes

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Arno Töll wrote: > On 02.07.2011 11:52, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > If it was upstream's man page, of course I wouldn't suggest modifying it > > in that way. But since it was written by the packager, and at least for > > now will mainly be installed on Debian, I think it makes sense not to > > advise

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Benoit, On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > Nicolas wrote: > > > Same as LGPL, the copyright is not the same. > > Again, you must include the text of the license in a stand-alone License > paragraph. actually you may be interested in the base-files package having /us

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Nicolas wrote: > > - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned > >previously. > > > > I used Arno advice and add twice reporting system, debian on and upstream > one. > > > > - Your debian/copyright file is still not DEP-5 compliant. To repeat > >what I said before, it

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Benoît, On 02.07.2011 11:52, Benoît Knecht wrote: > If it was upstream's man page, of course I wouldn't suggest modifying it > in that way. But since it was written by the packager, and at least for > now will mainly be installed on Debian, I think

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi Arno, Arno Töll wrote: > On 02.07.2011 10:33, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned > > previously. > > that's not necessarily a problem. You, apparently a FSFE member could > just take a look into coreutils manpages. See, for instance, cp(

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi, > - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned >previously. > > I used Arno advice and add twice reporting system, debian on and upstream one. > - Your debian/copyright file is still not DEP-5 compliant. To repeat >what I said before, it "doesn't use a versioned F

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Benoît, On 02.07.2011 10:33, Benoît Knecht wrote: > - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned > previously. that's not necessarily a problem. You, apparently a FSFE member could just take a look into coreutils manpages. Se

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi Nicolas, Nicolas wrote: > Hi all, > > thanks Benoît. I updated the package following your advices. > > I uploaded it on mentors and push my changes on the git repository. There are still a few things that need to be fixed: - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned p

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi all, thanks Benoît. I updated the package following your advices. I uploaded it on mentors and push my changes on the git repository. I allways search for a sponsor. Regards, Nicolas Le 2 juillet 2011 00:20, Benoît Knecht a écrit : > Hi Nicolas, > > Nicolas wrote: > > I am looking for a s

Re: RFS: phing (Another try)

Hi Nicolas, Nicolas wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phing". > > * Package name: phing > Version : 2.4.5-1 > Upstream Author : Hans Lellelid > * URL : http://phing.info/ > * License : LGPG-3 > Section : devel > > It builds these

Re: RFS: phing (another try)

Hi Nicolas, here are my comments about your work (i'm not a DD): -debian/control: since you specify '3.0 (quilt)' in debian/source/fomat, there is no need for a quilt dependency -debian/copyright: -Executing from the sources directory: $ grep -r copyright . you get, amo

Re: RFS: phing (another try)

Hi, thanks I will fix that soon. Regards, Nicolas 2011/6/29 Elías Alejandro > Hi, > I'm not DD. I'm sorrry. This my fast review about your package: > > 1. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat , debian/control > 2. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 > 3. no necessary quilt as build-depend

Re: RFS: phing (another try)

Hi, I'm not DD. I'm sorrry. This my fast review about your package: 1. debhelper is 7. Bump to 8 under: debia/compat , debian/control 2. Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 3. no necessary quilt as build-dependency[0] 4. under debian/copyright specify license version, LGPL-3 (i.e) 5. for your patch,

Re: RFS: phing (third try)

Nicolas wrote: > thanks Benoit for your help. I forgot to update debian/copyright file. All > package is released under LGPL (v3) license. OK, it looks like most of the files are LGPL (some don't have a license header though), but now you've removed the names of some of the copyright holders. It w

Re: RFS: phing (third try)

Hi Nicolas, Nicolas wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phing". > > * Package name: phing > Version : 2.4.5-1 > Upstream Author : Hans Lellelid , Michiel Rook < > mr...@php.net> > * URL : http://phing.info/ > * License : LGPL

RFS: phing (2nd try)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phing". * Package name    : phing   Version : 2.4.0-1   Upstream Author : Hans Lellelid * URL :  http://phing.info/ * License : LGPG-3   Section : devel It builds these binary packages:

RFS: phing

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phing". * Package name: phing Version : 2.4.1-1 Upstream Author : Hans Lellelid * URL : http://phing.info/ * License : LGPG-3 Section : devel It builds these binary packages: p

RFS: phing

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phing". * Package name: phing Version : 2.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Hans Lellelid * URL : http://phing.info/ * License : LGPG-3 Section : devel It builds these binary packages: phi