Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 19:00, vous avez écrit :
> Does Debian _actually_ require licence information to be added to every
> file? As an upstream I would consider that unreasonable when I have
> clearly given the licence elsewhere. If not, what would be sufficient?
> Must all upstreams be asked wh
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > > * IMPORTANT: Licence is stated only in the html document... You may ask
> > > upstream to include at least a LICENCE or COPYING file, and better add
> > > the licence to each headers in code files...
> >
> > This is all upstrea
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 17:47, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> > * libotpw-dev: Is it mandatory that you ship only a static library ?
>
> This is consistent with libopie-dev. Upstream doesn't produce a dynamic
> library but merely recommends compiling with the .o files directly.
>
> > * You call dh_in
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:51:16 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
you describe here I am not sure how this program
> differ from libpam-opie, opie-client and opie-server which
> are already in Debian.
> What are the differences?
> Kind regards
> Nico
OTPW is easier to use if you can't/don't want to use a ha
Hi Matthew,
* Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-14 16:50]:
> Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package otpw.
>
> Package name: otpw
> Version : 1.3
> Upstream Author : Markus Kuhn
> * URL : http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/download/otpw-1.3.tar.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 05:14:50PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 16:27, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> > Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package otpw.
>
> Few remarks concerning your package:
Thanks (-:
> * libotpw-dev: Is it mandatory that you ship only
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:14:50 +0100
Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again, I for myself recommend cdbs for simple packages since you are
> then sure not to forgot any dh_* call (yes, I know you may call
> uneeded ones but...) and reduce your rule only to the relevant
> parts... But this
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 16:27, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package otpw.
Hi !
Few remarks concerning your package:
* libotpw-dev: Is it mandatory that you ship only a static library ?
* You call dh_installman but in fact you install manua
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package otpw.
Package name: otpw
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Markus Kuhn
* URL : http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/download/otpw-1.3.tar.gz
* License : GPL2
Description : A One-time password system for PAM
9 matches
Mail list logo