On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:22:13PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> What's the best practice to fix things up? Should I bump the debian
> revision of the package and re-upload it? I don't want to be blamed for
> hijacking packages by accident ;)
No hard feelings ;-)
It's a native package, so I supp
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Simon McVittie:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 at 15:39:34 +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> > It seems as if sbuild exchanges the Maintainer field in the binary
> > package. If I schroot into my build environment and use
> > dpkg-buildpackage instead of sbuild
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 at 15:39:34 +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> It seems as if sbuild exchanges the Maintainer field in the binary
> package. If I schroot into my build environment and use
> dpkg-buildpackage instead of sbuild the Maintainer field in the
> resulting binary package remains unchanged.
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:48 +0200 schrieb Bruno Kleinert:
> Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:57 +0300 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > > Dear mentors,
> > > >
>
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:57 +0300 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > Dear mentors,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> >
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:57:58PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hi,
with so many replies, I guess I should write one more. :-/
> I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading;
> the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did)
> and, if necessary
Hi Sven,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> > "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
> > makes sens
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> > "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
>
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 01:06 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
> makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
> "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
> makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:03:24PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> I uploaded the package.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
"oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old
Linux games.)
It builds these binary packages:
oss-compat - Open So
12 matches
Mail list logo
