Your message dated Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:14:55 +
with message-id <20121210181455.gc24...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: ninja-build/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #683336,
regarding RFS: ninja-build/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683336 RFS: ninja-build/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
Bug #683336 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ninja-build/120715 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ninja-build/1.0.0-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
ninja-build/120715 [ITP]'
> stop
Stoppin
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Gary Kramlich , 2012-08-01, 23:43:
I've now uploaded the 120715 upstream release to mentors.
It appears to be here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ninja-build/ninja-build_120715.dsc
Why is it a native package?
"Architecture: i386 amd6
Any update on this? I uploaded a new version to mentors almost a week ago
now.
Thanks,
Gary Kramlich
On Aug 1, 2012 11:45 PM, "Debian Bug Tracking System"
wrote:
> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
> this Bug report.
>
> This is an automatically generated rep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683336 RFS: ninja-build/120715 [ITP]
Bug #683336 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ninja-build/120508+git638b033 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ninja-build/120715 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
ninja-build/120508+git638b033 [ITP
I've now uploaded the 120715 upstream release to mentors.
--
Gary Kramlich
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Gary,
Mathieu,
I've uploaded a new version of the package to mentors with most of your
suggestions. I'm going to work on pulling in the most recent release now
as we figure the few things left out.
> Thanks for packaging ninja. H
Gary,
Thanks for packaging ninja. Here are a few comments:
- Please use format 1.0 [1] for copyright. Do not forget to list your
own copyright (debian/* files).
- You are missing proper version check in d/control. On my stable system I get:
g++-4.4.real: no input files
[10/24] CXX build/build_
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 683336 wishlist
Bug #683336 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ninja-build/120508+git638b033 [ITP]
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683336 RFS: ninja-build/120508+git638b033 [ITP]
Bug #683336 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ninja-build/120508+git638b033
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ninja-build/120508+git638b033 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
ninja-build/120508+
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ninja-build"
* Package name: ninja-build
Version : 120508+git638b033
Upstream Author : Google
* URL : h
Hello Cristoph
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Christoph Egger wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 02:24:11AM -0600, William Vera wrote:
>> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ninja/ninja_0.1.3-2.dsc
>
> Uploading :) Maybee consider unexporting DH_VERBOSE next time for
> the
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 02:24:11AM -0600, William Vera wrote:
> - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ninja/ninja_0.1.3-2.dsc
Uploading :) Maybee consider unexporting DH_VERBOSE next time for
the final package.
Regards
Christoph
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.3-2
of my package "ninja".
It builds these binary packages:
ninja - Privilege escalation detection system for GNU/Linux
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 563328, 563329, 563989, 567443,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Christoph Egger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:16:45PM -0600, William Vera wrote:
>> Hello Mentors
>> Still need a ulpoader, appreciate any help
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:33 AM, William Vera wrote:
>> > Dear mentors,
>> >
>> >
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:16:45PM -0600, William Vera wrote:
> Hello Mentors
> Still need a ulpoader, appreciate any help
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:33 AM, William Vera wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.3-1
> > of my pa
Hello Mentors
Still need a ulpoader, appreciate any help
Thanks in advance
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:33 AM, William Vera wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.3-1
> of my package "ninja".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> ninja - Privilege escal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.3-1
of my package "ninja".
It builds these binary packages:
ninja - Privilege escalation detection system for GNU/Linux
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 559257
The package can be foun
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 05:27:00PM -0600, William Vera wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.3-1
> of my package "ninja".
I'm happy to sponsor this, but...
First, please update debian/copyright with the license information
from ninja.8 - it should be GPL-2
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.3-1
of my package "ninja".
It builds these binary packages:
ninja - Privilege escalation detection system for GNU/Linux
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 559257
The package can be foun
On Tue, 12 May 2009, William Vera wrote:
> Hi
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mauro Lizaur
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 May 2009, William Vera wrote:
> >
> >> > Also, seems like you're missing the copyright part of your package at the
> >> > end of the file, I mean something like:
> >> > The Debia
Hi
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mauro Lizaur
wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, William Vera wrote:
>
>> > Also, seems like you're missing the copyright part of your package at the
>> > end of the file, I mean something like:
>> > The Debian packaging is © 1900 - 2012, John Doe and
>> > is licen
On Tue, 12 May 2009, William Vera wrote:
> > Also, seems like you're missing the copyright part of your package at the
> > end of the file, I mean something like:
> > The Debian packaging is © 1900 - 2012, John Doe and
> > is licensed under the GPL, see `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
> >
>
Hello
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Mauro Lizaur
wrote:
> On Sat, 09 May 2009, William Vera wrote:
>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.2-3
>> of my package "ninja".
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> ninja - Privilege escalation detection syst
On Sat, 09 May 2009, William Vera wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.2-3
> of my package "ninja".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> ninja - Privilege escalation detection system for GNU/Linux
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.2-3
of my package "ninja".
It builds these binary packages:
ninja - Privilege escalation detection system for GNU/Linux
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 515174
The package can be foun
Hello
El sáb, 07-07-2007 a las 21:57 +1000, Paul Wise escribió:
> On 7/5/07, William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ninja/ninja_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
>
> No time for sponsoring, some comments:
> I see the security issues mentioned in the ITP have bee
On 7/5/07, William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ninja/ninja_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
I see the security issues mentioned in the ITP have been fixed, am I correct?
debian/rules contains unused configure target, comm
om: William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: RFS: ninja (updated package)
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.2-1
of my package "ninja".
It builds these binary packages:
ninja - Privilege escalation detection s
29 matches
Mail list logo
