On Thursday, July 14 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Additionally, I'd like to request DM rights for newLISP, if Gianfranco
>
>>is comfortable with it. There is at least one major task (porting
>>newLISP to GNU/Hurd, which is almost complete) that will go in soon, and
>>it would be nice to b
Your message dated Thu, 14 Jul 2016 06:45:39 + (UTC)
with message-id <2083486311.4449912.1468478739405.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#831061: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #831061,
regarding RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-3
to be marked as done.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'd like to get new changes to the newLISP package uploaded. The
changes are:
* Silence a warning when compiling on GNU/kFreeBSD.
When enabling builds on GNU/kFreeBSD, I forgot to forward-declare the
prototype for strptime, which gene
On Monday, July 04 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Still nothing. I had read the page, but it mentions the format of the
>>.commands file, and not dcut's CLI options. I also tried specifying the
>>options in a different order, but I get the same error.
>
>
> dcut ftp-master reschedule -d 0
Hi,
>Still nothing. I had read the page, but it mentions the format of the
>.commands file, and not dcut's CLI options. I also tried specifying the
>options in a different order, but I get the same error.
dcut ftp-master reschedule -d 0 -f newlisp_10.7.0-2_source.changes
this works for dpu
On Sunday, July 03 2016, James Cowgill wrote:
>> Hm, here's what I see when I try it:
>>
>> D: dcut 0.2.1
>> D: trying to get maintainer email from environment
>> D: Uploader from env: Sergio Durigan Junior
>> D: first argument "ftp-master" treated as host
>> D: loading dput
>> D: ca
Hi,
On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 14:28 -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Sunday, July 03 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > as a DM, I'm pretty sure (but I can't check this anymore since I
> > moved to DD),
> > that you can reschedule stuff for other people too.
> > Can you please try this com
On Sunday, July 03 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Thanks for the review, Gianfranco. If I may, I'd like to propose that
>
>>you upload the package as-is by the end of tomorrow (Sunday) even if
>>Andrey doesn't reply. I'd really like to get these fixes uploaded ASAP.
>
>
> fine for me, you
Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2016 10:37:35 + (UTC)
with message-id <968078331.194.1467542255278.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #829286,
regarding RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2
to be marked as done.
This
On Saturday, July 02 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I agree with your POV, lets see Andrey's opinion, I'm fine with the changes
> now :)
Thanks for the review, Gianfranco. If I may, I'd like to propose that
you upload the package as-is by the end of tomorrow (Sunday) even if
Andrey doesn'
Hi,
>Hm, this is actually only needed for GNU/kFreeBSD, which uses -lncurses
>on the linking phase. I updated Build-Depends to reflect that.
wonderful
>Yeah, it was just a simple sed command to remove things from all
>Makefiles. But it seems I did not specify the right set of files to
>appl
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Saturday, July 02 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded. They
>
>>basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806.
>>
>>The changes are:
>>
>>- Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles and
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded. They
>basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806.
>
>The changes are:
>
>- Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles and
> adjusting source files accordingly), and
>
>- Do not use -m32
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded. They
basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806.
The changes are:
- Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles and
adjusting source files accordingly), and
-
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:42:47PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> >> > I've uploaded the package, thanks for your contribution to Debian :)
> >> Thank you! I guess I will ping you again when the package has been
> >> accepted, so that you can allow me to make further uploads as a DM,
> >> r
On Monday, June 20 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:37:55PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> > I've uploaded the package, thanks for your contribution to Debian :)
>> Thank you! I guess I will ping you again when the package has been
>> accepted, so that you can
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:37:55PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> > I've uploaded the package, thanks for your contribution to Debian :)
> Thank you! I guess I will ping you again when the package has been
> accepted, so that you can allow me to make further uploads as a DM,
> right?
OK.
On Monday, June 20 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 04:58:32PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> > The package generates quite a lot of lintian output:
>> >
>> > P: newlisp source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object
>> > guiserver/guiserver.jar
>>
>> This file is
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:39:55 +0500
with message-id <20160620183955.gr15...@belkar.wrar.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#827333: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #827333,
regarding RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Andrey,
Thanks for the review. Comments below.
On Sunday, June 19 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> The package generates quite a lot of lintian output:
>
> P: newlisp source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object
> guiserver/guiserver.jar
This file is generated
* Andrey Rahmatullin , 2016-06-20, 00:25:
W: newlisp: unusual-interpreter usr/bin/newlispdoc #!newlisp
W: newlisp: unusual-interpreter usr/share/newlisp/util/syntax.cgi #!newlisp
Out of these, the unusual-interpreter tags are blockers as I don't know
how such shebangs could work.
The Lintian
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
The package generates quite a lot of lintian output:
P: newlisp source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object guiserver/guiserver.jar
P: newlisp source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary
qa-specific-tests/ffitest.dylib
I: newlisp source: vcs-
On Tuesday, June 14 2016, I wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp"
>
> * Package name: newlisp
> Version : 10.7.0-1
> Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller
> * URL : http://www.newl
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp"
* Package name: newlisp
Version : 10.7.0-1
Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller
* URL : http://www.newlisp.org
* License : GPL-3+, BSD-3-clause, GFDL-
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:56:02 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: newlisp/10.4.0-4 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #670589,
regarding RFS: newlisp/10.4.0-4 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On 04/27/2012 07:27 AM, David Bremner wrote:
David Bremner writes:
Nathan Owens writes:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
* Package name: newlisp
Version : 10.4.0-4
Upstream Author : [fill in name a
David Bremner writes:
> Nathan Owens writes:
>
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>>Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
>> * Package name: newlisp
>> Version : 10.4.0-4
>> Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
>> * URL
Nathan Owens writes:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
>Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
> * Package name: newlisp
> Version : 10.4.0-4
> Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
> * URL : [fill in URL of upstr
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp"
* Package name: newlisp
Version : 10.4.0-4
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 20:22 +0400, Dmitry Chernyak wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp".
>
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
A few things:
* debian/compat gives the compatibility level of 4. The most recent
level is 5 -- you should update your package.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp".
* Package name: newlisp
Version : 9.1.3-2
Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.newlisp.org
* License : GPL and compatibles
Section : devel
It builds
Scribit Bernhard R. Link dies 07/04/2007 hora 16:32:
> - http://newlisp.org from debian/copyright is no URL without a / at
> the end
According to RFC 2396, a generic URI without a path component is a valid
one (section 3). It is very uncommon, though.
Uncommonly,
Pierre
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open
* Dmitry Chernyak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070406 07:06]:
> newLISP community is looking for a sponsor for package "newlisp".
> [...]
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/newlisp/newlisp_9.1.1-2.dsc
> [...]
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Some problems (haven't loo
Dear mentors,
newLISP community is looking for a sponsor for package "newlisp".
* Package name: newlisp
Version : 9.1.1-2
Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.newlisp.org
* License : GPL
Section : devel
It builds the
Hello, All!
newLISP language users community is looking for a sponsor.
The language is a highly portable (pretty all *nixes and Win*) has a
good history, stable community.
Package name: newlisp
Version : 9.1.1-2
Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : ht
35 matches
Mail list logo
