Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 10:35:53AM -0500, David Mandelberg wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > What is the point of having a CVS snapshot for livehttpheaders ? > > I couldn't find any source code for the 0.9 or any of the official > releases, so I went with a cvs snapshot. Should I email the author >

Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

Mike Hommey wrote: > You should just forget the idea, livehttpheaders is already in debian. Sorry, the mirror I'm using must be really out of date or something. -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GAT/CM$/CS>$/CC/IT$/M/S/O/U dpu s+:++ !a C++$>C+++$ UB+++>$L$*-- P+>++$ L+++(++

Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 06:17:32AM -0500, David Mandelberg wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > You should just forget the idea, livehttpheaders is already in debian. > > Sorry, the mirror I'm using must be really out of date or something. Then change it, because it's been more than a year livehttphea

Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 06:17:32AM -0500, David Mandelberg wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > You should just forget the idea, livehttpheaders is already in debian. > > Sorry, the mirror I'm using must be really out of date or something. Then change it, because it's been more than a year livehttphea

Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

Mike Hommey wrote: > You should just forget the idea, livehttpheaders is already in debian. Sorry, the mirror I'm using must be really out of date or something. -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GAT/CM$/CS>$/CC/IT$/M/S/O/U dpu s+:++ !a C++$>C+++$ UB+++>$L$*-- P+>++$ L+++(++

Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 10:35:53AM -0500, David Mandelberg wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > What is the point of having a CVS snapshot for livehttpheaders ? > > I couldn't find any source code for the 0.9 or any of the official > releases, so I went with a cvs snapshot. Should I email the author >

Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

Mike Hommey wrote: > What is the point of having a CVS snapshot for livehttpheaders ? I couldn't find any source code for the 0.9 or any of the official releases, so I went with a cvs snapshot. Should I email the author asking for a 0.9 tarball? -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GA

Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

Mike Hommey wrote: > What is the point of having a CVS snapshot for livehttpheaders ? I couldn't find any source code for the 0.9 or any of the official releases, so I went with a cvs snapshot. Should I email the author asking for a 0.9 tarball? -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GA

Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 12:42:15PM -0500, David Mandelberg wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > package name: mozilla-livehttpheaders > license: GNU GPL > description: shows the http headers sent by a mozilla variant > homepage: > packag

Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 12:42:15PM -0500, David Mandelberg wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > package name: mozilla-livehttpheaders > license: GNU GPL > description: shows the http headers sent by a mozilla variant > homepage: > packag

RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package name: mozilla-livehttpheaders license: GNU GPL description: shows the http headers sent by a mozilla variant homepage: package page: - -

RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package name: mozilla-livehttpheaders license: GNU GPL description: shows the http headers sent by a mozilla variant homepage: package page: - -- -