Bug#682781: marked as done (RFS: minidlna/1.0.25+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:20:38 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: minidlna/1.0.25+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems has caused the Debian Bug report #682781, regarding RFS: minidlna/1.0.25+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV

Bug#682781: RFS: minidlna

Bart Martens wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:10:02PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > I'm not sure what you're proposing I should do. > > I sometimes give feedback on a package without proposing a solution. I understand, but since I didn't see a solution myself, I thought I'd ask if you had an

Bug#682781: RFS: minidlna

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:10:02PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > I'm not sure what you're proposing I should do. I sometimes give feedback on a package without proposing a solution. In this case it is, in my opinion, OK to remove the non-free parts from the upstream tarball, and to ship everythin

Bug#682781: RFS: minidlna

Bart Martens wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:45:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > Bart Martens wrote: > > > minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg/debian/copyright : > > > > > > | Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/files/ > > > | The icons.c file in the original tarball contained binary

Bug#682781: RFS: minidlna

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:13:53PM +, Bart Martens wrote: > That is about editing the to omit non-free parts, not about adding/replacing > files. I meant "editing the files". Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Bug#682781: RFS: minidlna

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:45:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > Bart Martens wrote: > > minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg/debian/copyright : > > > > | Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/files/ > > | The icons.c file in the original tarball contained binary blobs of > > possibly > > |

Bug#682781: RFS: minidlna

Hi Bart, Thanks a lot for your prompt reply. Bart Martens wrote: > minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg/debian/copyright : > > | Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/files/ > | The icons.c file in the original tarball contained binary blobs of > possibly > | unfree images. It has hence b

Bug#682781: RFS: minidlna

Hi Benoît, minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg/debian/copyright : | Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/files/ | The icons.c file in the original tarball contained binary blobs of possibly | unfree images. It has hence been replaced in the DFSG tarball by a file | containing the fre

Bug#682781: RFS: minidlna/1.0.25+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal User: sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org Usertags: not-for-wheezy, not-fit-for-wheezy Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minidlna" * Package name: minidlna Version : 1.0.25+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Just

Bug#659894: marked as done (RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version))

Your message dated Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:51:37 +0100 with message-id <87fwdsm9xi@deep-thought.43-1.org> and subject line Re: Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version) has caused the Debian Bug report #659894, regarding RFS: minidlna/

Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version)

Benoît Knecht wrote: > Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > Benoît Knecht writes: > > > dget -x > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.24+dfsg-1.dsc > > > > The package was removed due to a bug in the new debexpo version. Could > > you upload it again? > > Right, I h

Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version)

Hi Ansgar, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Benoît Knecht writes: > > dget -x > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.24+dfsg-1.dsc > > The package was removed due to a bug in the new debexpo version. Could > you upload it again? Right, I had not realized, thanks. I

Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version)

Benoît Knecht writes: > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.24+dfsg-1.dsc The package was removed due to a bug in the new debexpo version. Could you upload it again? Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.or

Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version)

retitle 659894 RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version) thanks Benoît Knecht wrote: > Benoît Knecht wrote: > > * Package name: minidlna > >Version : 1.0.23+dfsg-1 > >Upstream Author : Justin Maggard > >

Processed: Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 659894 RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server > (new upstream version) Bug #659894 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: minidlna-1.0.23+dfsg-1 (new upstream version) Changed Bug title to 'RFS: minidlna/1.

Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna-1.0.23+dfsg-1 (new upstream version)

Benoît Knecht wrote: > * Package name: minidlna >Version : 1.0.23+dfsg-1 >Upstream Author : Justin Maggard > * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/ > * git : git://gitorious.org/debian-pkg/minidlna.git >git-web : https://gitorio

Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna-1.0.23+dfsg-1 (new upstream version)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minidlna". * Package name: minidlna Version : 1.0.23+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Justin Maggard * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/ * git

RFS: minidlna (new upstream version)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minidlna". * Package name: minidlna Version : 1.0.22+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Justin Maggard * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/ * git : git://gitorious.org/debian-pkg/minidlna.git

Re: Modified tarballs [was: Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)]

On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote: > We do it all the time. Just 'dpkg -l|grep dfsg' on your local system > and you should find plenty of those modified source tarballs. > > What I, as an uploader, do in such cases is a diff between the upstream > provided tarball and what's in

Re: Modified tarballs [was: Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)]

On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:03:07PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote: >> Just to clarify, I find it concerning that we might be accepting >> source uploads that don't come straight from upstream and don't match >> what was released upstream. I'm rel

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)

Hi Benoît, On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:39:11AM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > Kilian Krause wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my > > > package "minidlna". > > > - dget > > > http://men

Modified tarballs [was: Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)]

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:03:07PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote: Hi, > Just to clarify, I find it concerning that we might be accepting > source uploads that don't come straight from upstream and don't match > what was released upstream. I'm relieved to hear that there is a way > to ensure in your

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)

2011/7/22 Benoît Knecht : > Hi Fernando, > > Fernando Lemos wrote: >> 2011/7/22 Kilian Krause : >> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my >> >> package "minidlna". >> >> - dget >> >> http://mentors.d

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)

Hi Fernando, Fernando Lemos wrote: > 2011/7/22 Kilian Krause : > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my > >> package "minidlna". > >> - dget > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)

Hi Kilian, Kilian Krause wrote: > Salut Benoît, > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my > > package "minidlna". > > - dget > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.21+d

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)

2011/7/22 Kilian Krause : > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my >> package "minidlna". >> - dget >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.21+dfsg-1.dsc > > 1. Your upoad us

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)

Hi, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:16:54PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > 1. Your upoad uses a tarball that's not identical to upstream's one. Please >consider adding a get-orig-tarball target to debian/rules to verify what >steps are required to generate it. ..that would be get-orig-source of

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)

Salut Benoît, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my > package "minidlna". > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.21+dfsg-1.dsc 1. Your upoad uses a tarball that's

RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my package "minidlna". It builds this binary package: minidlna - lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems The package is lintian clean, and has been tested to compile and run fine on amd64, armel

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package)

Hi Thomas, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Considering that nobody replied to you in 4 days, I reviewed the > package, and uploaded. Thank you very much, I appreciate it. It FTBFSed on kfreebsd-* unfortunately, so I'll work on fixing that and will have a new version ready soon... Stay tuned :) Cheers,

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package)

On 06/30/2011 07:25 PM, Benoît Knecht wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.20+dfsg-1 > of my package "minidlna". > > It builds these binary packages: > minidlna - lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems > > The package appears to be li

RFS: minidlna (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.20+dfsg-1 of my package "minidlna". It builds these binary packages: minidlna - lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 626835, 62895

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package)

Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Benoît, > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.18-5 > > of my package "minidlna". > > > [...] > > Looks pretty good, and I really like the fact that multiple people seem to be > working on it, makes package maintenance a lot more future-proof :-)

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:51:26PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Michael Tautschnig writes: > > Looks pretty good, and I really like the fact that multiple people seem to > > be > > working on it, makes package maintenance a lot more future-proof :-) Built > > and > > uploaded! > > > > Just o

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package)

Michael Tautschnig writes: > Looks pretty good, and I really like the fact that multiple people seem to be > working on it, makes package maintenance a lot more future-proof :-) Built and > uploaded! > > Just one thing, though, that I don't really like, which you might want to > reconsider for the

Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package)

Hi Benoît, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.18-5 > of my package "minidlna". > [...] Looks pretty good, and I really like the fact that multiple people seem to be working on it, makes package maintenance a lot more future-proof :-) Built and uploaded! Just one thing, though,

RFS: minidlna (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.18-5 of my package "minidlna". It builds these binary packages: minidlna - lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 613853, 617722, 61

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi Benoît, [...] > > > Just one question regarding your most recent changes: Why did you remove the > > AUTHORS sections from man pages? > > I just followed a recommendation from man-pages(7): > > "Use of an AUTHORS section is strongly discouraged. Generally, it is >better not to clutter

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi Michael, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Package looks fine, thanks a lot! I have just uploaded your package, but it > will > have to wait in NEW until ftp-masters find the time to review the package. > Please bear in mind that we are in freeze and ftp-masters are likely busy with > other work in

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi Benoît, > Benoît Knecht wrote: > > For now, I'm waiting for upstream to address the licensing issue, so I > > won't upload a new version until then. But I'm still fixing things > > locally and if anyone notices other issues with the package, please do > > point them out. I'm hoping my next uplo

Re: RFS: minidlna

Benoît Knecht wrote: > For now, I'm waiting for upstream to address the licensing issue, so I > won't upload a new version until then. But I'm still fixing things > locally and if anyone notices other issues with the package, please do > point them out. I'm hoping my next upload will be the one :)

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi Michael, Once again, thanks for your careful review, I greatly appreciate it. Michael Tautschnig wrote: > I've spotted a two more minor issues which you might want to correct > nevertheless as we'll have to wait for the license-header fix anyway > to make this code distributable. > > - Once y

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi Benoît, [...] > > I just uploaded a new version (1.0.18-3) [1] that addresses all the > issues you've pointed out to me (except the missing license headers, > I'll ask upstream about that). > > I hope I didn't miss anything, but please let me know if there are any > problems left. > I've s

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi Michael, Sorry for the delay, but I've been awfully busy over the week end. Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > It seems like a clever thing to do in {pre,post}inst: there's no need to > > create a default minidlna user:group if something else is already set in > > the default file; I'm just unsure

Re: RFS: minidlna

[...] > > It seems like a clever thing to do in {pre,post}inst: there's no need to > create a default minidlna user:group if something else is already set in > the default file; I'm just unsure if it should create the user:group > found in the default file if they do not exist already (if they do

Re: RFS: minidlna

Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > > - You ship a defaults file, which allows to customize $USER and $GROUP, > > > but your > > > scripts don't take this into account. > > > > Are you sure about that one? In minidlna.init, I only assign default > > values to $USER and $GROUP if they are empty (which

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi again, > Hi Michael, > > Thanks a lot for reviewing my package. > You're welcome! > Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > I've reviewed your package, and found the following issues, which should be > > corrected: > > > > - Copyright information in source files is very incomplete. Some of them > >

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi Michael, Thanks a lot for reviewing my package. Michael Tautschnig wrote: > I've reviewed your package, and found the following issues, which should be > corrected: > > - Copyright information in source files is very incomplete. Some of them even > lack any information. Please run licensech

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi Benoît, [...] > > I've now uploaded a corrected version (minidlna-1.0.18-2), and forwarded > the relevant patches upstream. You can find it at > . > > I'm still looking for a sponsor, so don't hesitate if any of you is > interested. >

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi, Fernando Lemos wrote: > I'm not a DD or a DM, but here's my (very superficial) review, as I'm > mildly interested in this package. > > * It seems that you are missing Build-Depends on libavcodec-dev and > libavutil-dev. > > * lintian -I is mosly clean, except for: > > I: minidlna: spelling-

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi, Thanks a lot for your comments, I really appreciate you taking the time. Fernando Lemos wrote: > I'm not a DD or a DM, but here's my (very superficial) review, as I'm > mildly interested in this package. > > * It seems that you are missing Build-Depends on libavcodec-dev and > libavutil-dev.

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi, 2010/10/15 Benoît Knecht : > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minidlna". > I'm not a DD or a DM, but here's my (very superficial) review, as I'm mildly interested in this package. * It seems that you are missing Build-Depends on libavcodec-dev and libavutil-dev.

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi, Paul Gevers wrote: > As you target embedded systems, maybe you should contact the emdebian > project [1] to see if you can more easily find a sponsor there. If you > try, but don't find one therer, please don't hesitate to return to this > list. Thanks for your advice. I would think people at

Re: RFS: minidlna

Hi, [I cc'd you just in case you are not subscribed to this list.] http://www.emdebian.org/support.html On 10/15/10 10:23, Benoît Knecht wrote: > minidlna - lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems As you target embedded systems, maybe you should contact the emdebian projec

RFS: minidlna

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minidlna". * Package name: minidlna Version : 1.0.18-1 Upstream Author : Justin Maggard * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/ * License : GPL-2 and BSD Section : net It builds thes