Re: RFS: mg (updated package)

2008-01-14 Thread Jens Peter Secher
When you have a new version, I will be happy to sponsor. Cheers, -- Jens Peter Secher. _DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_. A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad?

Re: RFS: mg (updated package)

2008-01-13 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 14/01/2008, Trent W. Buck wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20070918-1 > of my package "mg". Some quick comments: - debian/changelog, line 11: wrong indentation? - You B-D on debhelper >= 5, and still use compat 4 (debian/compat). Any reason to do so? - You don't use

RFS: mg (updated package)

2008-01-13 Thread Trent W. Buck
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20070918-1 of my package "mg". It builds these binary packages: mg - microscopic GNU Emacs-style editor The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 445232, 445233, 445234 The package can be found