Bug#845311: marked as done (RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2 [NMU])

2016-11-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:09:26 +0100 with message-id <20161122120926.ga2...@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843775: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #845311, regarding RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2 [NMU] to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#845311: RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2 [NMU]

2016-11-22 Thread Jens Sauer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mdadm" Package name: mdadm Version : 3.3.2-5+deb8u2 Upstream Author : Neil Brown URL : http://neil.brown.name/blog/mdadm License : GPL Section : admin

Bug#809210: RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1 [NMU]

2015-12-28 Thread Yann Soubeyrand
Thank you for the upload! Cheers Yann

Bug#809210: marked as done (RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1 [NMU])

2015-12-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 28 Dec 2015 15:04:00 + (UTC) with message-id <1801604845.6473866.1451315040908.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#809210: RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1 [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #809210, regarding RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1 [NMU]

Bug#809210: RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1 [NMU]

2015-12-28 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Please go ahead. Shamefully, I have never done an s-p-u upload to date! =) So it would take me a while to figure out how the changelog entry should look like, what the suite and upload target are etc. Regards, Dimitri. On 28 December 2015 at 11:54, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Yann, I see

Bug#809210: RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1 [NMU]

2015-12-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Yann, I see the previous upload has been sponsored by Steve [2015-11-23] Accepted mdadm 3.3.4-1.1 (source amd64) into unstable (Yann Soubeyrand) (signed by: Steve McIntyre) Can't you just ask him to sponsor again to jessie s-p-u? I have no problem in sponsoring something to s-p-u, but I'm n

Bug#809210: RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1 [NMU]

2015-12-28 Thread Yann Soubeyrand
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I prepared a package for mdadm containing a patch to fix bug #784070 (https://bugs.debian.org/784070) which prevents booting a software RAID 1 in degraded mode. I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it to jessie- proposed-updates. I've

Bug#805858: marked as done (RFS: mdadm/3.3.4-1.1 [NMU])

2015-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:57:18 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#805858: RFS: mdadm/3.3.4-1.1 [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #805858, regarding RFS: mdadm/3.3.4-1.1 [NMU] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#805858: RFS: mdadm/3.3.4-1.1 [NMU]

2015-11-23 Thread SOUBEYRAND Yann - externe
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I made a package for mdadm containing a patch to fix bug #784070 (https://bugs.debian.org/784070) and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it as it is a rather annoying bug. The old package maintainer (Michael Tokarev) confirmed the sou

Re: Re: RFS: mdadm

2011-09-09 Thread Tim Gokcen
> Also, you have some debian/.pc/ leftovers in your package, which should not be there. I see in the quilt manpage that debian/.pc is quilt's doing, but I'm not sure why its leftovers are still hanging around. Does that folder not get removed automatically as part of the build process? > You

Re: RFS: mdadm

2011-09-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michael Tokarev [2011.09.09.1006 +0200]: > You included some stuff in your package which is not mentioned in the > changelog - notable some very questionable mdadd.sh thing (which comes > without a manpage too, but with some inline docs), and alot of documentation > about various raid

Re: RFS: mdadm

2011-09-09 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 09.09.2011 01:16, Tim Gokcen wrote: > I have uploaded a new version of mdadm which, on top of the previous fixes, > also fixes the FTBS bug 625392 and bug 63380. I am therefore still/again > seeking a sponsor for my NMU of package "mdadm". > > This upload is a fix for two trivial bugs opened

Re: RFS: mdadm

2011-09-08 Thread Tim Gokcen
I have uploaded a new version of mdadm which, on top of the previous fixes, also fixes the FTBS bug 625392 and bug 63380. I am therefore still/again seeking a sponsor for my NMU of package "mdadm". This upload is a fix for two trivial bugs opened against the current mdadm package, as well as a

Re: RFS: mdadm

2011-09-08 Thread Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Hi On Thursday 08 September 2011, Tim Gokcen wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mdadm". You really want to CC the current mdadm maintainer for your NMU, done with this mail; 'my package "mdadm"' is a bit ambiguous in this case as well. > This upload is a fix

RFS: mdadm

2011-09-08 Thread Tim Gokcen
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mdadm". This upload is a fix for two trivial bugs opened against the current mdadm package; the Debian-exclusive 'checkarray' script is excessively verbose and this can lead to unwanted nuisance cron mail. The upstream version is consi